Examples of using Macroevolution in English and their translations into Greek
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Macroevolution would turn a fish into a cow or a duck.
These proposed big changes are referred to as macroevolution.
Macroevolution generally refers to evolution above the species level.
What is the difference between Macroevolution and Microevolution?
You are exactly right, andthat is exactly what I am saying about macroevolution.
Macroevolution refers to evolution of groups larger than an individual species.
They can accept microevolution, but not macroevolution.
Nobody has ever observed macroevolution in the laboratory or in nature.
Do creationists accept microevolution but not macroevolution?
Nobody has ever observed macroevolution take place in the laboratory or in nature.
Creationists do believe in microevolution, but not macroevolution.
Macroevolution encompasses the grandest trends and transformations in evolution, such as the origin of mammals and the radiation of flowering plants.
Anti-evolutionists now accept microevolution but not macroevolution.
Nor should the Day-Age view be confused with“theistic evolution,” the view that macroevolution is true but, instead of being guided by blind chance, was guided by the hand of God.
There are two types of evolution microevolution and macroevolution.
Whoever thinks macroevolution can be made by mutations that lose information is like the merchant who lost a little money on every sale but thought he could make it up on volume.
Young earth creationists accept microevolution but not macroevolution.
Creationists often argue that they accept microevolution but not macroevolution--one common way to put it is to say that dogs may change to become bigger or smaller, but they never become cats.
Dr McCarthy elaborates his astonishing hypothesis in an article on Macroevolution.
The teaching of macroevolution is built on the claim that mutations-random changes in the genetic code of plants and animals-can produce not only new species but also entirely new families of plants and animals.19.
However, this form of evolution may eventually lead to macroevolution, or speciation.
If you are to accept the teaching of macroevolution as true, you must believe that agnostic or atheistic scientists will not let their personal beliefs influence their interpretations of scientific findings.
Mendel's laws of genetics show us why microevolution does not lead to macroevolution.
How would you respond to the claim that proof of so-called microevolution is evidence that macroevolution must have taken place?
There is a massive difference in scale andeffect between microevolution and macroevolution.
All of the changes, diversifications, andextinctions that happened over the course of life's history are the patterns of macroevolution.
This blanket dismissal of evolution ignores important distinctions that divide the field into at least two broad areas:microevolution and macroevolution.
But the Darwinian mechanism that's used to explain all evolutionarychange will be relegated, I believe, to being just one of the several mechanisms- maybe not even the most important when it comes to understanding macroevolution, the evolution of major transitions in body type.".
Stuart Newman is quoted as saying"… the Darwinian mechanism that's used to explain all evolutionary change will be relegated,I believe, to being just one of the several mechanisms- maybe not even the most important when it comes to understanding macroevolution, the evolution of major transitions in body type.".