Examples of using Macroevolution in English and their translations into Slovenian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Computer
-
Official/political
-
Programming
Macroevolution does not occur.
Major evolutionary changes are called macroevolution.
Macroevolution brings changes over the species level.
Microevolution and macroevolution are both forms of evolution.
There are two types of evolution: microevolution and macroevolution.
Evolution: Microevolution and macroevolution are the two types of evolution.
Do creationists accept microevolution but not macroevolution?
In other words, macroevolution is a consequence of a lengthy series of microevolutions.
Creationists believe in microevolution but not macroevolution.”.
Thus, the distinction between micro- and macroevolution is not a fundamental one- the difference is simply the time involved.
There is no absolute proof of one species evolving into another- macroevolution.
Thus, the distinction between micro- and macroevolution is not a fundamental one- the only difference between them is of time and scale.
Two types of evolution can be identified as microevolution and macroevolution.
If you are to accept the teaching of macroevolution as true, you must believe that agnostic or atheistic scientists will not let their personal beliefs influence their interpretations of scientific findings.
Why do many prominent evolutionists insist that macroevolution is a fact?
In this sense, microevolution and macroevolution might involve selection at different levels- with microevolution acting on genes and organisms, versus macroevolutionary processes such as species selection acting on entire species and affecting their rates of speciation and extinction.
The two different types of evolution are called macroevolution, and microevolution.
Creationists(and I include Intelligent Design advocates)often use an artificially wide distinction between microevolution and macroevolution.
Then why do so many evolutionists and others claim that macroevolution is a fact?
The previously mentioned NAS brochure leaves the reader with the impression that the fossilsfound by scientists more than adequately document macroevolution.
Many creationists will say,‘We accept microevolution, but not macroevolution.'.
We have conceived EcoSim, a versatile simulation platform that has been designed to investigate several broad ecological questions, as well as long-term evolutionary patterns andprocesses such as speciation and macroevolution.
How would you respond to the claim thatproof of so-called microevolution is evidence that macroevolution must have taken place?
Two of the specific categories of Evolution are Microevolution, and Macroevolution.
The Straight Dope's"Do creationists accept microevolution but not macroevolution?".
Many creationists will say that they believe in“microevolution”, but not“macroevolution”.
There are two aspects of evolution- minor change(microevolution) and major change(macroevolution).
When you're talking about kinds or change in families, you're actually talking about macroevolution.
God then brought forth abundantly all creatures, great and small, declaring thatmicroevolution was permitted, but not macroevolution.