Examples of using Programme performance in English and their translations into Greek
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Computer
The Joint Monitoring Committee shall examine all issues affecting the programme performance.
We consider that such averages should provide useful indications of programme performance if all programme indicators are of the required quality.
This has resulted in proposals for a smaller number of higher quality indicators of programme performance.
Assessment of programme performance(progress on implementation of activities, delivery of outputs, activities, achievement of results and impacts and use of resources);
A list of ready-to-implement projects is also an important success for programme performance and absorption.
People also translate
Significant efforts have been made in the 2019 Programme Performance Overview to improve the reporting of data on the Connecting Europe Facility.
The main challenge in evaluation studies is to develop a satisfactory standard against which programme performance can be measured.
The CMEF establishes means for improving programme performance, ensuring the accountability of programmes and allowing an assessment of the achievement of established objectives.
One key reason is that it is very dif- ficult to plan and assess the contribu- tion of payroll, for example,to overall programme performance.
The Commission stresses that the indicator selection for the Programme Performance Overview was based in particular on the relevance and availability of data and not on the resulting value of the indicator.
It is precisely for this reason that the Commission has started to publish the PPO to have a morereader-friendly compilation of information on programme performance.
The‘Methodological Note' accompanying the Programme Performance Overview(PPO) addresses the indicator selection:‘A selection of indicators was made based on certain criteria such as relevance, availability of data etc.'.
A set of indicators was established by managing authorities to monitor the operational programme performance in its implementation and not in operations.
As already stated, with the adoption of the 2014-2020 MFF, the framework of reporting to the European Parliament and Council has been adapted,with an increased focus on programme performance.
Closure should include an evaluation of programme performance and the achievement of outputs and results 126 There was little emphasis on the achievement of outputs and results in the regulatory framework and design for the closure of the 2007-2013 period.
Monitoring Committees set up for each programme will be given a more prominent role in supervising the programme performance and all the factors influencing this.
In other words, prior to measuring programme performance and before testing assumptions linking programme and outcomes, evaluators should assess the potential impact of problems they may encounter throughout the programme evaluation process.
However, progress on select indicators provides only part of the story andcannot be used to draw firm conclusions about programme performance.
That review should provide a fully-fledged adjustment of programmes based on programme performance, while also providing an opportunity to take account of new challenges and relevant CSRs issued in 2024.
In fact, there are instances in the report for every heading where the progress calculation based on the Programme Statements yields better results than based on the Programme Performance Overview.
The Member State shall establish a performance framework which shall allow monitoring,reporting on and evaluating programme performance during its implementation, and contribute to measuring the overall performance of the Funds.
(18) Member States should establish a performance framework for each programme covering all indicators, milestones and targets to monitor,report on and evaluate programme performance.
That review should provide a fully-fledged adjustment of programmes based on programme performance, while also providing an opportunity to take account of new challenges and relevant CSRs issued in 2024, as well as progress with the National Energy and Climate Plans and the European Pillar of Social Rights.
A mid-term review will determine if changes in the programmes are needed for the last two years of the funding period based on emerging priorities, programme performance and most recent country-specific recommendations.
Annexes 27 ROM grading system ROM assesses a programme performance in respect of the five evaluation criteria(relevance, efficiency, effec- tiveness, impact prospects and potential sustainability) according to the following grading system: Grading Numerical Qualitative Explanation for the grade A 4 Very good The situation is considered highly satisfactory, largely above average and potentially a reference for good practice.
Implemented in most respects In the context of helping the Member States,the Commission defined a framework of common indicators for monitoring the programme performance and included the list of performance indicators in community legislation in 2014.
Annexes 26 Recommendation Implementation status The Court's assessment(1) For future programming of specific measures, the Commission should help the Member States draw up their programmes by promoting best practices andby defining a harmonised framework of indicators for monitoring programme performance.
Based on this framework, the Commission expects that, as of the financial years 2017-2018,the evaluation report will be able to include initial conclusions on programme performance and information as to whether programmes are on track or require adjustment.
RecommendatIon 5 the commission should use the information provided by the member States to monitor programme performance on an annual basis, including information that already exists and information yet to be provided in full. this report was adopted by chamber i, headed by mr michel cretin, member of the court of auditors, in luxembourg, at its meeting of 6 october 2010.
The Member State, where appropriate, in cooperation with local and regional authorities, shall establish a performance framework which shall allow monitoring,reporting on and evaluating programme performance during its implementation, and contribute to measuring the overall performance of the Funds.