Examples of using Paris protocol in English and their translations into Hebrew
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
Paris Protocol of 29 April 1994.
Israel also agreed to let Palestinians to have a currency, although it opposed it in the Paris Protocol".
In the Paris Protocol, it was agreed to allow free passage of agricultural products.
Palestinian officials said that this would allow for re-negotiating andamending parts of the Paris Protocol, the economic portion of the Oslo Accords.
Not only does the Paris Protocol prevent such a disengagement, reality prevents it.
If we decided, hypothetically,to sever our economic relations with Israel and cancel the Paris Protocol on economic[relations], could we actually live without them?
The Paris protocol is an agreement dealing with the economic relations between Israel and the PA.
Recent protests in the West Bank have awakened debate on the Paris Protocol, which regulates the economic relationship between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.
The 1994 Paris Protocol signed between the Israelis and Palestinians put some order into the various economic issues between the two parties.
Although the customs union framework wasintended to ensure free flow of workers, the Paris Protocol did not expressly prevent Israel from prohibiting workers to enter its territory.
Amend the Paris Protocol on Economic Relations to enhance the PA's financial and bureaucratic powers and boost its economic independence.
According to a source in Israel's Civil Administration, various ideas are being explored to end the crisis,including a reopening of the Paris Protocol and various tax exemptions for the PA.
Under the Paris protocol that defined Israeli-Palestinian relations, the Palestinians may not issue their own currency, issue debt or charge value-added tax independently.
If the Palestinians really want economic independence,they need to open the Paris Protocol and demand from Israel real opportunities to conduct economic ties with global markets.”.
The council reiterated its previous decision(2105) to revoke security coordination with Israel at all levels andto revoke the economic agreements signed as part of the Paris protocol.
Israel has come to the conclusion that the Paris Protocol is the best for it, as it does not want to be responsible for or participate in aspects of the Palestinian economy.
Mogherini stressed in a statement that Israel's decision to freeze the transfer oftax revenue“runs counter to Israel's obligations under the Paris Protocol”- the economic part of the Oslo Accords.
When the Palestinians realized that Israel intends on leveraging the Paris Protocol to apply pressure on them, they launched a campaign designed to expose this unjustified link from their point of view.
As to the Paris protocol, a Fatah spokesman said that they had spoken about the issue with Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman and asked him to tell the State of Israel that they were interested in returning to the negotiating table to discuss it.
Israel's trade with the PA is not officially defined as exports orimports, since the Paris Protocol, the economic annex to the 1994 Oslo Accords, notes that they have a customs union.
The revenue sharing arrangements, outlined by the Paris Protocol, through which the Government of Israel collects VAT, import taxes and other revenues on behalf of the Palestinian Authority, and shares them on a monthly basis, have not been systematically implemented.
On August 1st, the Israeli and Palestinian public discovered that the Palestinian Authority andthe State of Israel signed a secret agreement revising the Paris Protocol, a key document that determines the economic relations between the two entities.
Today, although the Gaza Strip is still formally part of the Paris Protocol, in many ways, the agreement is no longer applied to the Strip, mostly with respect to the entry of goods and workers from Gaza to Israel.
These now infamous Palestinian negotiators who signed the agreement in Paris back on April 29, 1994, termed the Protocol on Economic Relations between Israel and the PLO(better known as the“Paris Protocol”), agreed to what our economy could and couldn't do.
The Protocol on Economic Relations, also called the Paris Protocol, was an agreement between Israel and the PLO, signed on 29 April 1994, and incorporated with minor amendations into the Oslo II Accord of September 1995.
According to The Portland Trust, these committees“will examine pending fiscal disputes, including deductions made by Israel in the past two decades over electricity, water,and medical transfers bills” and the Palestinians will seek changes to the Paris Protocol“such as renegotiating import lists and quotas, and acquiring approval for infrastructure construction and projects that pass through Area C in the West Bank.”.
In fact, when financing the public sector, the Palestinians act as a local authority,and if we separate political sovereignty from economic sovereignty, in the Paris Protocol, the Palestinians actually agreed to continue the economic relations that were existed with Israel between 1967-1994(i.e. to unite the customs between us and them)".
Israeli and Palestinian negotiation teams met in Paris to sign one of themost important annexes to the Oslo Accords- the Paris Protocol, the agreement which regulates the economic relationship between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.
The report states that reviving the Israeli-Palestinian Joint Economic Committee,originally set to monitor implementation of the Paris Protocol and resolve outstanding issues, could significantly enhance economic and fiscal cooperation between the parties.