Examples of using Separation policy in English and their translations into Hebrew
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
Separation Policy.
How and when the separation policy was conceived.
More than two-thirds of Americans opposed the family separation policy.
Is the separation policy effective?
Israel 's Separation Policy and Forced Eviction of Palestinians from the Center of Hebron.
This decision, as we have stated in the past, is a political decision,made in the context of the separation policy.
The separation policy was subsequently adopted by Israel's National Security Council, where Schueftan has also served as an advisor.
For further examples of official statements about the“separation policy,” see, Gisha,“Separating Land, Separating People”, June 2015.
As part of a‘separation policy' to separate West Bank Palestinians from Palestinians in Gaza, the Israeli authorities prohibit the passage of Palestinians in and out of Gaza.
The following document provides afactual basis for a substantive discussion on the“separation policy” and its political, economic and security ramifications.
The result(“the effect”) of the separation policy, as practiced today, is discriminatory, even if the motive for the separation is not the desire to discriminate.
The Israeli government calls its policy restricting access into andout of Gaza“the separation policy,” which it says serves both security and political goals.
The rhetoric that has been heard recently seems to indicate that more and more Israeli decision-makers understand the need toreconnect Gaza and the West Bank and abandon the separation policy.
We will soonpublish a document in which we detail what we know about the“separation policy” for the purpose of providing a comprehensive factual basis for a public debate on the policy and its various implications.
When security officials are asked about the sweeping prohibition on marketing goods in Israel and the West Bank, they do not say it is a security necessity,but rather that it is part of the“separation policy”.
The main components of Israel's“separation policy” are strict, sweeping restrictions on Palestinian movement and systemic lack of law enforcement against violent settlers when they assault Palestinians.
During a cabinet meeting on Thursday, President Trump sought to blameDemocrats for the humanitarian crisis he created with his family separation policy, going so far as to accuse Democrats of“creat[ing] a massive child smuggling industry.”.
Security officials have said that the purpose of the separation policy is to put pressure on Hamas and help the Palestinian Authority, but in practice, the policy harms civilians- for instance, Gaza's civil society organizations.
In the spring of 2014, before Operation Protective Edge, we began working on a new position paper which would present data and analysis regarding the state of Gaza's economy, in order to gauge the impact of access restrictions between Gaza and the West Bank,and the potential that goes unfulfilled because of Israel's separation policy.
This is the third explanation wehave heard so far justifying the separation policy and yet still, there has been no public debate about this policy and the impact it has on the lives of both Palestinians and Israelis.
Agriculture building materials closure COGAT construction materials Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories Criteria crossings economy Egypt electricity Erez crossing export fishing flotilla foreign ministry freedom of information freedom of movement fuel Gaza gaza strip goods Hamas humanitarian aid human rights industrial diesel industry infrastructure Israel Kerem Shalom Palestinian authority power plant Protective Edge RafahRafah Crossing raw materials school Separation Policy students textile tunnels UN unemployment UNRWA West Bank.
Former Republican presidential candidateSen. John McCain tweeted that this“family separation policy is an affront to the decency of the American people, and contrary to principles and values upon which our nation was founded.”.
As part of a'separation policy' to divide West Bank Palestinians from Palestinians in Gaza1, the Israeli authorities prohibit the passage of Palestinians into and out of Gaza, with exceptions mainly made for businesspeople and traders, medical patients and their companions, and employees of international organizations.
For instance, when the court upheld Israel's“separation policy,” which tears families apart between the West Bank and Gaza, the justices merely suggested amendments to the procedure governing relocation to the West Bank(HaMoked 2012), which have yet to be implemented.
One consequence of the detention policy is family separation.
However, a policy of long-term separation amounts to acceptance of the oppression.
We hold the state directly responsible for the policy of discrimination and separation and for the widening mistrust between Jews and Palestinians.
The argument will focus on deference to the Executive, separation between the Courts and Foreign Policy.
The policy of separation that Israel implements in Hebron has already destroyed the economy of the city center and led Palestinians to desert it in droves, unable to live under the strict restrictions imposed upon them.