Examples of using Directive does not preclude in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
This Directive does not preclude the establishment of private-sector-based supervision systems;
Some of these governments also examine the question from the point of view of Direct- ive 96/71 and are of the opinion that the directive does not preclude the measure at issue in the main proceedings.
However, the directive does not preclude national measures which are necessary for the protection of health.
Finally, the Court observes that, if the deletion of an unfair term renders the contract unenforceable,as in the present case, the directive does not preclude the national court from substituting the contested term with a supplementary provision of national law.
Furthermore, the directive does not preclude a pricing policy provided that it does not run counter to the directive's objectives.
Lastly, the Advocate General takes the view that, where the deletion of an unfair term would make performance of the contract impossible,as in the present case, the Directive does not preclude the national court from replacing the term at issue with a supplementary provision of national law, where such a replacement is possible under national law.
The Authorisation Directive does not preclude either the special charge levied in France on electronic communications operators or the Maltese excise duty on mobile telephony services.
The fact that a trader provides, in an invitation to purchase,all the information listed in Article 7(4) of that directive does not preclude that invitation from being regarded as a misleading commercial practice within the meaning of Article 6(1) or Article 7(2) of that directive. .
The Directive does not preclude the possibility that some Member States may wish to extend the scope to other beneficiaries such as small or medium-sized enterprises or indeed to some commercial property transactions.
In addition, the Advocate General takes the view that it is not appropriate to accede to T-Mobile Austria's request for temporal limits to be imposed on the effects of the judgment to be delivered by the Court in this case, should the Court find that a credit transfer must beconsidered a payment instrument within the meaning of the directive and that the directive does not preclude a general prohibition of surcharging.
In its judgment in the Wolf case, the Court finds that the directive does not preclude that age limit as laid down by the Land of Hesse for recruitment to intermediate career posts in the fire service.
However, that directive does not preclude a Member State from providing for further exclusionary measures designed to ensure observance of the principles of equal treatment of tenderers and of transparency, provided that such measures do not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective.”.
It follows that Article 33 of the Sixth Directive does not preclude the maintenance or introduction of stamp duties or other kinds of taxes, duties or charges which do not have the essential characteristics of VAT.
Moreover, that Directive does not preclude in certain circumstances the consumer's right to reimbursement of the cost of repair or replacement from being limited, where necessary, to an amount proportionate to the value the goods would have if there were no lack of conformity and the significance of the lack of conformity.
As regards the latter point, the Court acknowledges that the Directive does not preclude the protection guaranteed by international organisations from being ensured through the presence of a multinational force in the territory of the third country.
This Directive does not preclude Member States from specifying processing operations and processing procedures in national rules on criminal procedures in relation to the processing of personal data by courts and other judicial authorities, in particular as regards personal data contained in a judicial decision or in records in relation to criminal proceedings.
The Court declares, next, that the directive does not preclude measures controlling medicinal product prices from being adopted on the basis of predicted expenditure, provided that the predictions are based on objective and verifiable data.
It takes the view that Article 24 of that directive does not preclude associations from being a party to legal proceedings, since, pursuant to that article, Member States are required to adopt‘suitable measures' to ensure the full implementation of that directive. .
Third, the Court holds that the directive does not preclude a Member State from imposing on credit institutions obligations, not provided for by the directive, as regards the types of charges that they may levy in connection with consumer credit agreements.
Finally, the Advocate General takes the view that the directive does not preclude the application of national provisions, such as the Austrian provision at issue, which prohibit generally a payee from levying handling charges, without a distinction being drawn between different payment instruments.
On the other hand, the directive does not preclude such an age limit where its aim is to share out employment opportunities among the generations within the profession of panel dentist, if, taking into account the situation in the labour market concerned, the measure is appropriate and necessary for achieving that aim.
Finally, the Advocate General considers that the Directive does not preclude a national provision which prohibits or suspends any legal action against a financial establishment from the entry into force of a moratorium, from having retroactive effect in regard to interim protective measures adopted in another Member State prior to the declaration of the moratorium.
It was highlighted that the directive does not preclude traders from providing other means of communication(such as electronic contact forms, instant messaging or telephone callback), so long as those means of communication allow for direct and efficient communication between consumers and traders.
In the light of the preliminary questions, the Court concludes that the Directive does not preclude a calculation of the minimum wage for hourly work and/or for piecework which is based on the categorisation of employees into pay groups, provided that the calculation and categorisation are carried out in accordance with rules that are binding and transparent, a matter which it is for the national court to verify.
The Court makes clear however that the directive does not preclude national legislation from imposing a targeted retention of data for the purpose of fighting serious crime, provided that such retention of data is, with respect to the categories of data to be retained, the means of communication affected, the persons concerned and the retention period adopted, limited to what is strictly necessary.
In the AG's view, the Directive does not preclude a host provider from being ordered to remove information‘equivalent' to the information characterised as illegal, provided it has been made aware of that equivalent information by the person concerned, third parties or another source, as in that case, the removal obligation does not entail general monitoring of information stored.
The Advocate General finds that the Directive does not preclude an obligation on a service provider to withdraw similar information to that declared unlawful, where it has been warned of this by the person concerned, by a third party or by another source, since in such a case the obligation to withdraw does not involve general supervision of the information being stored.
The Court finds that the directive does not preclude the Romanian legislation which, as regards consumer credit, allows consumers to have direct recourse to a consumer protection authority, which may subsequently impose penalties on credit institutions for infringement of the national legislation, without having to use beforehand the out-of-court resolution procedures as provided for by national law for such disputes.
