Examples of using Parallel postulate in English and their translations into Indonesian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Ecclesiastic
He also wrote influential work on Euclid's parallel postulate.
To the ancients, the parallel postulate seemed less obvious than the others.
The most glaring one deals with his fifth postulate, also known as the parallel postulate.
To obtain a non-Euclidean geometry, the parallel postulate(or its equivalent) must be replaced by its negation.
All are based on the first four of Euclid's postulates, but each uses its own version of the parallel postulate.
Some think his best inspiration was recognizing that the Parallel Postulate must be an axiom rather than a theorem.
In all approaches, however, there is an axiom which islogically equivalent to Euclid's fifth postulate, the parallel postulate.
An important part of the book is concerned with Euclid''s famous parallel postulate, which attracted the interest of Thabit ibn Qurra.
More specifically, Euclidean geometry is different from other types of geometry in that the fifth postulate, sometimes called the parallel postulate.
An important part of thebook is concerned with Euclid's famous parallel postulate, which attracted the interest of Thabit ibn Qurra.
Al-Jawhari presented some 50 propositions in addition to those offered by Euclid, and attempted(though unsuccessfully)to prove the parallel postulate.
Legendre spent 40 years of his life working on the parallel postulate and the work appears in appendices to various editions of his highly successful geometry book Eléments de GéométrieⓉ.
Other mathematicians have devised simpler forms of this property(see parallel postulate for equivalent statements).
Simply replacing the parallel postulate with the statement,"In a plane, given a point P and a line ℓ not passing through P, all the lines through P meet ℓ", does not give a consistent set of axioms.
Other mathematicians have devised simpler forms of this property(see parallel postulate for equivalent statements).
Another example is al-Tusi's son, Sadr al-Din(sometimes known as"Pseudo-Tusi"), who wrote a book on the subject in 1298, based on al-Tusi's later thoughts,which presented another hypothesis equivalent to the parallel postulate.
All of these early attempts made at trying to formulate non-Euclideangeometry however provided flawed proofs of the parallel postulate, containing assumptions that were essentially equivalent to the parallel postulate. .
This work contained nearly fifty propositions additional to those given by Euclid andincluded an attempt by al-Jawhari to prove the parallel postulate.
In the first case, replacing the parallel postulate(or its equivalent) with the statement"In a plane, given a point P and a line ℓ not passing through P, there exist two lines through P which do not meet ℓ" and keeping all the other axioms, yields hyperbolic geometry.
The most notorious of the postulates is often referred to as"Euclid's Fifth Postulate," orsimply the"parallel postulate", which in Euclid's original formulation is.
Euclid's fifth postulate, the parallel postulate, is equivalent to Playfair's postulate, which states that, within a two-dimensional plane, for any given line ℓ and a point A, which is not on ℓ, there is exactly one line through A that does not intersect ℓ.
The most notorious of the postulates is often referred to as“Euclid's Fifth Postulate,” orsimply the” parallel postulate“, which in Euclid's original formulation is.
As Euclidean geometry lies at the intersection of metric geometry and affine geometry, non-Euclidean geometry arises wheneither the metric requirement is relaxed, or the parallel postulate is set aside.
In his Commentary on Euclid's Elements, al-Jawhari presented some 50 propositions in addition to those offered byEuclid, and attempted(though unsuccessfully) to prove the parallel postulate.
Another example is al-Tusi's son, Sadr al-Din, who wrote a book on the subject in 1298, based on al-Tusi's thoughts,which presented another hypothesis equivalent to the parallel postulate.
In trying to prove the parallels postulate, he accidentally proved properties of figures in non-Euclidean geometries.
In trying to prove the parallels postulate, he accidentally proved properties of figures in non-Euclidean geometries.