Examples of using Constructed normal value in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
The constructed normal value was therefore recalculated taking into account this element.
The exporting producers asserted that the constructed normal value is too high to be considered reasonable.
The constructed normal value was established using as much of the company's own information as possible.
Therefore, the claims concerning the profit margin used to determine constructed normal value were rejected.
For the third company, both constructed normal values and normal values based on domestic prices were used.
Neither of the two exporting producers concerned provided any evidence invalidating the Commission's reasoning to use constructed normal value.
The constructed normal value shall include a reasonable amount for administrative, selling and general costs and for profits.
The three exporting producers therefore requested the deduction of packing costs from all export prices and constructed normal value on the same basis.
It was consequently necessary to calculate a constructed normal value for the grade in question, in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
The South African exporting producer andone Indian exporting producer objected to the method used to determine the constructed normal value of the product concerned.
The lowest possible constructed normal value, based on the complainant's information, was above export prices and therefore there must have been dumping;
For one exporting producer, normal value was entirely based on domestic prices andfor another exporting producer entirely on constructed normal value.
Also, a comparison of these export prices with the constructed normal value established for this producer in the original investigation also indicated the existence of significant dumping.
The cooperating Korean company disputed the Commission's methodology for calculating the domestic profit margin,claiming that the calculation of constructed normal values resulted in unreasonably high margins.
ZDB a.s. claimed an adjustment on constructed normal values for packing costs since these costs were included in the SG& A expenses and an adjustment for the cost of the reels had been made on the export price.
The same Korean company also submitted that certain selling expenses relating to domestic sales should be excluded from the domestic SG& A expenses included in the constructed normal values.
However, the claim concerning the comparison of individual export prices including individual packing costs with a constructed normal value including a weighted average export packing cost per product type was accepted.
These exporting producers claimed that the company-wide profit margin during the investigation period, i.e. a global figure including both the product concerned and other products,should be used to determine the constructed normal value.
It is furthermore confirmed that the constructed normal value was calculated on the basis of actual prices and costs duly verified during an on-the-spot investigation at the premises of the cooperating FA producer in the United States of America.
This claim was rejected because the company suggested taking into account opening andclosing stocks only in determining the profit margin and not in determining the cost of manufacturing used to calculate the constructed normal value.
In fact in this case, the constructed normal value was based on the cost of production of the exported type including its packing cost and, therefore, no difference in packing costs existed between export price and normal value. .
Three exporting producers claimed that the Commission proceeded to a comparison between normal value andexport price without treating packing costs consistently between constructed normal value and normal value based on actual prices.
This argument was accepted as the profit margin used in a constructed normal value under the first sentence of Article 2(6) and Article 2(6)(a) and(b) of the basic Regulation, has to be calculated on the basis of domestic sales only.
The allegation of continuation of dumping for Russia is based on a comparison of normal value, established on the basis of domestic prices and constructed normal value, with the export prices of the product concerned when sold for export to the EU.
The constructed normal value was calculated on the basis of the cost of production of an equivalent type produced by the cooperating Taiwanese exporting producer, including a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative expenses and for profit.
Two Indonesian exporting producers argued that normal values for companies with no sales in the ordinary course of trade on the domestic market should be based, in accordance with Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation,on domestic sales prices of another company rather than on a constructed normal value.
On the basis of a comparison of export prices to the Community of the above-mentioned exporting producers with their domestic prices and constructed normal value, the applicants allege that dumping margins calculated would be higher than those found in the previous investigation that lead to the existing measures.
One exporting producer argued that the Commission incorrectly rejected the net foreign exchange gain included in the selling, general and administrative expenses, used in determining thefull cost of production, for use in establishing constructed normal value and in the ordinary course of trade test.
With regard to these arguments,as set out in recital(37) above, constructed normal value with the profit on domestic sales during the original investigation in Taiwan was used because the domestic sales in the Indonesian market during the investigation period were considered insufficient for establishing normal value on the basis of sales prices.
The Indian exporting producer requested that the domestic sales of certain high-value product types be excluded from the constructed normal value calculations on the grounds that these products were not exported, or only rarely, during the IP and that the domestic sales of these product types yielded abnormally high profits that distorted the determination of the average profit of the product concerned.