Examples of using Contested letters in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
The Commission denies that the contested letters infringe the principle of proportionality.
Consequently, it is necessary to consider the action further only insofar as it has been brought against the second, third, fourth and fifth contested letters.
The Italian Republic also claims that the contested letters infringe the principle of legal certainty.
fourth and fifth contested letters.
The Italian Republic claims that the contested letters infringe Article 32 of the general regulation
fourth and fifth contested letters- the principles of proportionality,
The Italian Republic claims essentially that, by sending it the contested letters, the Commission was notifying it of decisions which had clearly not been adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in its Rules of Procedure.
fourth and fifth contested letters resolve the uncertainty engendered by the absence from those documents of the legal basis for the decisions adopted by the Commission.
It contends that insofar as the contested letters refer to the general rule at issue
It is clear from the statement of facts(see paragraphs 20 to 35 above) that the contested letters are part of a lengthy exchange of correspondence between the Commission
The Italian Republic claims that the contested letters infringe the rules concerning the certification of expenditure, laid down in Article 9 of Regulation No 438/2001,
There is no basis for the Italian Republic's argument that the second, third, fourth and fifth contested letters infringe Article 9 of Regulation No 438/2001
Annul the second, third, fourth and fifth contested letters insofar as they inform it that the payments made would not match the amount applied for as a result of the deduction of the amounts corresponding to the advance payments at issue;
As has already been noted in paragraph 103 above, the second, third, fourth and fifth contested letters are in conformity with points 1
The Italian Republic argues that the contested letters infringe the obligation laid down in Article 253 EC to state the reasons on which a Community measure is based,
By its sixth plea in law, the Italian Republic claims that the contested letters infringe the principle of proportionality
By deciding, in the second, third, fourth and fifth contested letters, that the advance payments at issue,
It also follows that the second, third, fourth and fifth contested letters, insofar as they rely on the general rule at issue as a basis for refusing to charge to the Funds the amounts corresponding to the advance payments at issue,
By its seventh plea in law, the Italian Republic claims that the contested letters infringe the general principle of equal treatment,
The Commission contends that the second plea in law should be rejected on the ground that the contested letters contain a sufficient statement of the reasons on which they are based,
Read in that context, the contents of the second, third, fourth and fifth contested letters enable the Italian Republic
The Italian Republic claims that the action against the first contested letter is admissible.
Insofar as the present action has been brought against the first contested letter, therefore, it must be dismissed as inadmissible.
Finally, the Italian Republic challenges the Commission's argument that the first contested letter merely confirms the view expressed by it in the interpretative memorandum.
the Italian Republic was expressly informed, by the first contested letter, of the Commission's refusal to act.
the first contested letter merely repeats the Commission's interpretation of the third subparagraph of Article 32(1)
In the first place, the first contested letter contains, in accordance with the contents of the letters of 29 July 2003
Consequently, it must be held that the first contested letter, insofar as it disclosed to the Italian Republic the Commission's refusal to act in regard to the payment applications at issue,
The first contested letter expressly refers to letter No 2772 of 21 March 2005(see paragraph 31 above), which in turn
It follows from the foregoing that the first contested letter, insofar as it refers to the general rule at issue,