Examples of using Cross-border voting in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
It deals with obstacles to cross-border voting for shareholders.
The Commission believes that existing legislation at EU level does not address sufficiently the cross-border voting problem.
Some investors have mentioned that cross-border voting is still problematic
the complexity of proxy voting also have a considerable impact on the costs of cross-border voting.
The EESC welcomes the Commission proposal as barriers to cross-border voting provide distortions of the single market.
The obstacles make cross-border voting prohibitively expensive for small shareholders and very costly for institutional investors.
The EESC welcomes the Commission proposal as barriers to cross-border voting provide distortions of the single market.
Moreover, existing legal obstacles to cross-border voting prevent small individual cross-border shareholders who are willing to exercise their voting rights from using means that would allow them to do so cheaply and simply.
The aim of these consultations was to elicit the views of interested parties on the main obstacles to cross-border voting and on possible minimum standards which the Commission could propose in this field.
but also that a number of specific problems relating to cross-border voting would need to be solved.
The existence of costs, associated with obstacles to cross-border voting means that investors are unable to become as actively engaged in the governance of companies as they may wish.
After having carried out a comprehensive impact assessment the Commission proposes the following minimum standards which would eliminate the main obstacles in the cross-border voting process and enhance certain other rights of shareholders.
The Directive aims at removing the key obstacles to the cross-border voting process in listed companies having their registered office in a Member State by introducing specific requirements with respect to selected rights of shareholders in relation to general meetings.
Additionally, a strong call had been made to increase the efficiency of the investment in transmitting information and facilitating cross-border voting by effective intermediary communication among themselves and with shareholders.
A directive seeking to remove the key obstacles to the cross-border voting process and focusing on selected rights of shareholders in the general meeting seems the most appropriate type of instrument, if effective simplification of the cross-border voting process is to be achieved and the disparities between Member States reduced.
that problems relating to cross-border voting should be solved as a matter of urgency.
A Recommendation would not guarantee the introduction of minimum standards in key areas which are the origin of cross-border voting problems and increased costs,
the possibility of participating in general meetings via electronic means and ensuring that cross-border voting rights are able to be exercised.
to create an attractive environment for shareholders and to enhance cross-border voting by improving the efficiency of the equity investment chain in order to contribute to growth, jobs creation
it appears that the main obstacles to cross-border voting for investors are the following, in order of importance: the requirement to block shares before a general meeting(even where it does not affect the trading of the shares during this period), difficult and late access to information that is relevant to the general meeting and the complexity of cross-border voting, in particular proxy voting. .
to create an attractive environment for shareholders and to enhance cross-border voting by improving the efficiency of the equity investment chain in order to contribute to growth, jobs creation
Prüm Treaty: cross-border cooperation in combating terrorism and cross-border crime vote.