Examples of using Third plea in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
The third plea.
At the hearing, while the applicant acknowledged that Article 74 of Regulation No 40/94 did not confer upon it any right to have the documents produced on 6 September 2002 taken into consideration,it did not formally withdraw its third plea.
The third plea in law.
Finally, the Court of First Instance also rejected the second part of the second plea, based on the lack of any real risk of loss for the EAGGF- a further condition for the imposition of a financial correction under the Guidelines- and the third plea concerning a breach of the principle of proportionality.
The third plea must therefore be rejected.
In the light of the finding made in paragraph 176, and the matters set out in paragraph 163, of the present judgment, there is no need to examine the second plea in the main appeals, concerning the unusual nature of the damage allegedly suffered by FIAMM and Fedon,or the second and third pleas in the cross-appeals, respectively concerning the lack of certainty of that damage and the lack of a causal link between that damage and the conduct of the Community institutions.
The third plea must therefore also be rejected.
I therefore consider that the third plea is unfounded and should be rejected.
The third plea concerns the fundamental rights of the appellant.
In the Commission's submission, the third plea must therefore also be rejected in its entirety.
Third plea: breach of the obligation to state reasons.
Consequently, the third plea in law must be rejected.
C- Third plea in law: the applicant's lack of negligence or intentional fault.
Consequently, the third plea must be dismissed as unfounded.
The third plea: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94.
The second part of the third plea, alleging manifest errors of assessment.
Third plea raised by BASF: incorrect application of the 1996 Leniency Notice.
CITIGROUP AND CITIBANK v OHIM- CITI(CITI) within the second strand of the third plea in law, that the Board of Appeal incorrectly assessed the similarity of the signs at issue within the meaning of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94.
C- Third plea in law: misuse of powers and infringement of the principles of proportionality, legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations.
Consequently, the third plea in law must be rejected as inadmissible.
The third plea in law, which alleges an infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94, is made up of three strands, in which the applicants claim that.
The first plea and the parts of the third plea which did not relate to the complaints examined under the fourth plea were rejected.
The third plea in law, alleging failure to follow the procedures for the adoption of Commission decisions and infringement of the Commission's Rules of Procedure.
As regards the third plea in law, determine whether there are similarities between the signs at issue.
By its third plea, the applicant maintains that the Commission committed manifest errors in the assessment of its tender and in the assessment of the successful tenderer's tender.
Thus, if Vodafone takes the view, as it does in its third plea, that it was unable to submit comments on essential information, namely that information which was submitted for the first time in the procedure before the Commission, it could put forward such a plea before the national court or tribunal.
By its third plea, Salzgitter accused the Commission of not considering on its own initiative, under Article 95 CS, whether the aid at issue could be declared compatible with the common market.
III- The third plea: breach of the obligation under Article 253 EC to state reasons.
As the third plea was raised by UCB in the alternative in case the Court should uphold the Commission's theory that the global and European arrangements constituted a single and continuous infringement(see paragraph 35 above), there is no longer any need to adjudicate on that plea. .
The Court then rejected the third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 220(2)(b) of the CCC, since the appellant had not been able to demonstrate that the acts of the competent authorities contributed to the issue or acceptance of the certificates at issue which proved to be forged paragraphs 303 to 307.