Examples of using Minimum specific in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
A minimum specific weight of 78 kg/hl;
Furthermore, the Commission observes that the minimum specific weight criterion fixed by the Regulation at.
In line‘E. Minimum specific weight(kg/hl)' of the table in point 1 of the Annex, the value‘71' for maize;
To lay down limit values and the harmonized, minimum specific values for the protection of workers.
The applicant questions whether it is believable that the objective of standardisation should be pursued by means of adoption of the criterion of minimum specific weight.
Since the minimum specific consumption calculated for the fleet was 193 g/kWh, the balance for the whole fleet would be based on the corrected value, namely 211 g/kWh.
Its secondary argument is that, in any event,the contested provisions have fixed the minimum specific weight at too high a level.
The criterion of minimum specific weight is a grain classification factor according to which a superior quality of grain corresponds to a high specific weight.
Annex I to Regulation No 824/2000, as amended by the Regulation, provides,in point E, that the minimum specific weight for maize is 71 kg/hl.
A minimum specific programme which is agreed upon by all the anti-Japanese democratic parties is absolutely indispensable, and we are prepared to consult with them on the basis of the programme outlined above.
At that meeting, several Member States expressed their opposition or their objections, especially as regards the introduction of the criterion of minimum specific weight.
In the second place,the introduction of the quality criterion relating to minimum specific weight for maize is quite unheard of and unprecedented in both Community law and European custom.
In addition, the objective of standardisation pursued by the new rules provides still less justification for the immediate application of the new criterion of minimum specific weight.
First, the Commission believes that the new minimum specific weight factor is relevant in light of the object of improving the quality of maize with a view to its longterm keeping and subsequent use.
Because HM with PAC is a technology subjected to great variability between observers when obtaining pressure curves andinterpreting data, minimum specific training is required.
The Commission maintains that the choice of the minimum specific weight fixed at 71 kg/hl corresponds to the American standard and enables the greater part of European production to satisfy that criterion, having regard to weather conditions during the 2006/07 season.
In addition, the Commission maintains that it took account of the special situation of maize producers in central Europe,since it reduced the minimum specific weight required from 73 to 71 kg/hl.
The Commission argues that adopting for maize, as for other cereals,the criterion of minimum specific weight in order to guarantee a certain quality for that cereal falls altogether within the ambit of the powers delegated to it under the COM Regulation.
In the case of maize, it tightens the requirements on moisture content, and broken andoverheated grains significantly and introduces a minimum specific weight requirement.
In point of fact, first, the applicant stresses that when the Regulation wasdrawn up it argued, time and again, that the criterion of minimum specific weight was irrelevant having regard to the objective pursued by that measure, which was the longterm conservation of stocks.
Due to the similarities of the performance curves supplied by MBB for these categories and the relative constancy of specific consumption in a large rotation range, it is supposed that in Diesel engines(Figure 1)the specific consumption in conditions of use is proportional to the minimum specific consumption.
The applicant maintains that in accordance with Article 5 of the COM Regulation the Commission had no power to adopt the new criterion of minimum specific weight for maize on the ground that the latter was not an adequate criterion of quality.
It explains in this respect that the marketing year 2006/07 produced a harvest which was normal, even good in terms of rain and sunshine, and which cannot be compared with the previous marketing year which had been exceptional andhad produced a harvest of an average specific weight very slightly under the minimum specific weight of 71 kg/hl.
The Commission observes that the sole aim of the action is annulment of the provisions of the Regulation relating to the condition of minimum specific weight for maize and wonders whether the action is admissible, given that the contested provisions cannot be detached from the rest of the Regulation in accordance with the Court of Justice's case-law.
Moreover, information supplied by the applicant makes it clear that even in years gone by a significant proportion of Hungarian production had already reached the minimum specific weight demanded by the new provisions.
It follows from the foregoing that,by introducing a new criterion of minimum specific weight below which maize may not be offered to the intervention agency or must be reduced in price, without the producers concerned having been notified in good time, the contested provisions have infringed the legitimate expectations of those producers.
The applicant maintains that, in light of Article 5 of the COM Regulation,the Commission lacked competence to adopt the new criterion of quality relating to the minimum specific weight of maize on the ground that the latter was not an adequate criterion of quality.
Introduction of the criterion of minimum specific weight alone did not have the effect on harvests described by the applicant, for the reduction in maximum moisture content, provided for by the Regulation, 13.5% instead of 14.5%, and not challenged in the action, brought about an increase of 0.5 to 1 kg/hl in the specific weight of maize presented for intervention.
When cereals are taken over for intervention the Commission will set a moisture content within the 14% to 15% bracket,set the maximum percentage of sprouted grains at 6%(instead of 8%) and set the minimum specific weight at 72 kg/hi instead of 68 kg/hi.
The import, per marketing year, of 21 000 tonnes of oats falling within CNcode 1004 00 00, having a minimum specific weight of 55 kg/hl, a maximum moisture content of 12% and a maximum content of grains of cereals other than oats of 2%, eligible for an import duty of ECU 89 per tonne in accordance with the Council Regulation No 3093/95, shall be subject to the issue of an import licence in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation.