Examples of using Value of commodities in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
No airport, will declare ele,pay 50% on the value of commodities.
The value of commodities is determined by the labour required for their production.
Marx is examining what it is that determines the value of commodities and gives the answer, the human labour embodied in them.
The value of commodities is in inverse ratio to the productiveness of labour.
They are not only protecting fruits orvegetables in fresh air circulation to reduce spoilage also can upgrade the value of commodities.
The decline in the value of commodities- relative to that of gold- would therefore be expressed in a sharp increase in their price.
The genius of Aristotle shines precisely in the fact that he discovers in the expression of value of commodities a relation of equality.
The value of commodities is determined by the socially necessary general human labour embodied in them, and this in turn is measured by its duration.
For a monetary system based on a gold standard,this means that the"secular" decline in the value of commodities is strongly accentuated.
It is now comprehensible why Rodbertus determines the value of commodities simply by"labour" and at most allows for different degrees of intensity of labour.
The brilliancy of Aristotle's genius is shown by this alone, that he discovered, in the expression of the value of commodities, a relation of equality.
He confounds the value of commodities measured by the quantity of labor embodied in them with the value of commodities measured by"the value of labor.
The brilliancy of Aristotle's genius isshown by this alone, that he discovered, in the expression of the value of commodities, a relation of equality.
We see, then, all that our analysis of the value of commodities has already told us, is told us by the linen itself, so soon as it comes into communication with another commodity, the coat.
In his Treatise on Taxes and Contributions(first edition, 1662), Petty gives a perfectly clear andcorrect analysis of the magnitude of value of commodities.
Either the value of commodities is determined by the costs of subsistence of the labour necessary for their production, that is, in present-day society, by wages.
On the one hand all labour is, speaking physiologically, an expenditure of human labour power, and in its character of identical abstract human labour,it creates and forms the value of commodities.
At the same time there is inherent in the endless series of its expressions the fact that the value of commodities is irrelevant with regard to each particular form of use-value in which it appears.
In measuring the value of commodities by labor, M. Proudhon vaguely glimpses the impossibility of excluding labor from this same measure, in so far as labor has a value, as labor is a commodity. .
We have seen how Hume confuses every increase in the precious metals with such an increase as is accompanied by a depreciation, a revolution in their own value, hence,in the measure of value of commodities.
Marx is here dealing only with the determination of the value of commodities, i.e., of objects which, within a society composed of private producers, are produced and exchanged against each other by these private producers for their private account.
What Marx is saying here is that yes indeed we have all these terms like ducats, louis, dollars and pounds and so on,and we measure the value of commodities in quantities of those terms, but at some point there has to be some relationship between the way these nominal forms of money are articulated and a monetary base, a commodity base.
And the determination of value of commodities by labour and the free exchange of the products of labour, taking place according to this measure of value between commodity owners with equal rights, these are, as Marx has already proved, the real foundations on which the whole political, juridical and philosophical ideology of the modern bourgeoisie has been built.
The value of commodity A, is qualitatively expressed, by the fact that commodity B is directly exchangeable with it.
If the value of commodity A remain constant, its relative value expressed in commodity B rises and falls inversely as the value of B.
The value of commodity A, is qualitatively expressed, by the fact that commodity B is directly exchangeable with it.
Hence, if the value of commodity A remain constant, its relative value expressed in commodity B rises and falls inversely as the value of B.
I say"ultimately," because average prices do not directly coincide with the values of commodities, as Adam Smith, Ricardo, and others believe.
And so, too, is the value of labour-power,because it depends on the values of commodities.
The relative value of commodity A(i.e. its value expressed in commodity B) rises and falls in direct ratio to the value of commodity A, while the value of commodity B remains equal.