Examples of using Commission explained in English and their translations into Romanian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
In its replies, the Commission explained that the purpose of this proposal is two-fold.
In the explanatory memorandum accompanying the proposal for Regulation No 1/2003, the Commission explained the following.
In the 2005 Communication, the Commission explained its position on the maintenance of the three categories.
First of all, a specific identifier would be assigned to each of the questions set foreach of the candidates, given that, as the Commission explained, the questions set were not the same for each candidate.
To justify its refusal to pay, the Commission explained that it had not received the final cost statements on time.
For simplicity and transparency, the public database eAmbrosia was launched, it will gradually include all 3.2 thousand protected items in the EU. It is expected that by the end of the year agricultural andfood products will also be included,” the commission explained.
For the overall amount of aid alleged, the Commission explained the‘normal market price' approach taken by SFEI.
The Commission explained a procedure that it would follow, if ever it thought that there was a‘systemic threat' to the rule of law in an EU country.
On 29 August 2018 the Commission, EASA and INAC held a technical meeting during which the Commission explained its concerns about the ability of INAC to fulfil its international obligations with regard to safety oversight of its air carriers.
The Commission explained in the contested decision(recital 121) why it considered that the 1994 bond issue did not constitute State aid.
A combined analysis, at enduser level, of analogue, ISDN and ADSL access services is required not only because they amount to a single supply ofservices at wholesale level, but also because, as the Commission explained in the contested decision(recital 26) without having been challenged by the applicant on that point, ADSL cannot be offered to endusers on its own because, for technical reasons, it always involves an upgrading of analogue or ISDN narrowband connections.
The Commission explained that choice by stating that, for example, if there are difficulties with coding orders, further work is needed.
In reply to a question put at the hearing, the Commission explained that its intention was to consider freedom of residence included in the concept of freedom of movement.
The Commission explained that Mr Italianer had been replaced immediately in order to ensure that his‘effectiveness' was not undermined and that there was no‘gap'.
Next, emphasising the considerable differences between the undertakings' market positions, the Commission explained that it was necessary to adjust that amount by reference to the relative importance of the undertakings concerned on the relevant market and therefore by reference to their capacity to cause serious harm to competition(recitals 345 and 346 to the Decision).
As the Commission explained in its presentation of the 2020 energy strategy, an investment of EUR 1 trillion is needed to develop the outdated power grid in Europe over the next few years.
In response to these opinions, the Commission explained that the proposed system was expected to bring significant added value in the fight against EU fraud.
The Commission explained how elements of this proposal have already been taken into account, e.g. in the Commission proposal on promotion and communication with a specific budget dedicated to fruit and vegetables.
In its opinion, the Commission explained that the document contained assessments and opinions of its services and reflected the debate between them.
The Commission explained that expenses totalling EUR 3 536.23, corresponding to per diems and air tickets, had now been deemed eligible and had been deducted from the amount to be recovered.
In the explanatory memorandum of the proposal, the Commission explained that“national, regional or local levels of decision-making are considered to be the most appropriate frameworks to address the particularities linked to GMO cultivation”.
In reply, the Commission explained that the Bulgarian law on electronic communications, transposing the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications, had been adopted on 10 May 2007.
In the Explanatory Memorandum of its proposal for a Council decision, the Commission explained the very specific circumstances leading to the exceptional granting of this derogation and already announced to be willing to examine the possibility of allowing the application of a targeted reverse charge mechanism by any interested Member State.
In its opinion, the Commission explained that it had mentioned Article 35(7) of the EU Treaty because the Italian court had held in 1998 that the ne bis in idem principle was not applicable in Italy.
In its opinion, the Commission explained that the complainant's application had been rejected on the grounds that preparatory and followup work for the plenary sessions must have required more than mere a4 endance during the sessions.
As the Commission explained in its December 2006 Communication, mobility of persons is of the utmost importance for ENP partners and also for the EU, in order to fully deliver on this foreign policy priority.
The Commission explained that his wife was not entitled to benefit from the provisions of Article 5(2) of the Directive, which exempts third country nationals holding a“residence card” from any visa requirement by EU Member States.
The Commission explained in considerable detail in its pleadings that, due to the particular characteristics of certain substances, the mode of administration of those substances may have a direct impact on the level of residues in animal tissues.
The Commission explained that the aim of this aspect of the proposal is to simplify the administrative and co-ordination arrangements between the national and European level, and in turn to facilitate Member States' action for joined-up services to individuals.
In the contested decision, the Commission explained that the lunch of 28 July 2004 at the Shangri La Corsetti restaurant in Rome between Mr C1 and Mr C2 of Chiquita, and Mr P1 of Pacific, served as the starting point of the collusive agreement between Chiquita and Pacific and that, following that meeting, Mr C1 and Mr P1 began calling each other regularly.