Examples of using Commission explained in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
If both parties decide to lift the suspension,concessions offered by Gazprom will also apply, the Commission explained.
In response to these opinions, the Commission explained that the proposed system was expected to bring significant added value in the fight against EU fraud.
However, the allocation of funds per country and priorities would come during the programming phase, once the regulation hasbeen adopted by the European Parliament and the Council, the Commission explained.
In that Communication the Commission explained that it would assess whether additional measures were needed, inter alia by monitoring progress on the basis of voluntary arrangements.
First of all, a specific identifier would be assigned to each of the questions set for each of the candidates,given that, as the Commission explained, the questions set were not the same for each candidate.
The Commission explained that the exclusion of profit-making entities had not been a question of“administrative practice” but was based on a number of specific considerations.
A preliminary market investigation has shown“that the Oracle databases and Sun's MySQL compete directly in many sectors of the database market and that MySQL is widely expected to represent a greatercompetitive constraint as it becomes increasingly functional,” the Commission explained.
The Commission explained the reasons for the delays in the payments and stated that payment had subsequently been made to the complainant for the assignment carried out in early October 2004.
However, the Ombudsman notes that in the le er of 4 September 2002 andthen in its opinion to the Ombudsman, the Commission explained to the complainant the reasons why it had been decided not to fi ll the post of SNE and apologised for the misleading le er of 16 January 2002.
As the Commission explained in SEC(2010) 436 final, developing SIS II on the basis of SIS 1+ RE solution was likely to have a significant impact on the national projects.
Officials were told of this change inpolicy on July 24th at a meeting in Brussels in which the Commission explained that the documents had"been submitted to databases of[member states'] national parliaments" meaning that"hundreds of people have actually uncontrolled access".
As the Commission explained at the hearing, for numerous tasks, server/server communication protocols appear, in fact, as‘extensions' of the client/server communication protocols.
In response to a question put by the Court at the hearing as to the reason for which the Commission had not made available all thetechnical information at the beginning of the tendering procedure, the Commission explained that, when the call for tenders was launched, the explanatory documents, in particular the asset list, were not yet ready.
As the Commission explained in its December 2006 Communication, mobility of persons is of the utmost importance for ENP partners and also for the EU, in order to fully deliver on this foreign policy priority.
While the Parliament, in its Discharge resolution 2003, invited the Commission to convert the Synthesis into a consolidated assurance statement on the financial management andcontrols as a whole, the Commission explained that, the Synthesis report is an act through which political responsibilities are exercised by analysing the annual activity reports.
In its opinion, the Commission explained that it had mentioned Article 35(7) of the EU Treaty because the Italian court had held in 1998 that the ne bis in idem principle was not applicable in Italy.
In the explanatory memorandum of the proposal, the Commission explained that“national, regional or local levels of decision-making are considered to be the most appropriate frameworks to address the particularities linked to GMO cultivation”.
As the Commission explained in its presentation of the 2020 energy strategy, an investment of EUR 1 trillion is needed to develop the outdated power grid in Europe over the next few years.
In its Communication of April 2006, the Commission explained and clarified how the Community acquis, and in particular Article 49 EC as interpreted by the ECJ, had to be observed and how the results required by the Directive could be achieved in a more effective manner.
The Commission explained how elements of this proposal have already been taken into account, e.g. in the Commission proposal on promotion and communication with a specific budget dedicated to fruit and vegetables.
In this communication the Commission explained why an integrated f l flexicurity approach was needed to achieve the objectives of the Lisbon strategy and underlined the need to modernise the European social model.
The Commission explained that, with the agreement of the French Ministry of Social ATairs, a French pension authority was considering the possibility of transferring pension rights irrespective of whether France had ratified a special agreement on transfer of pension rights.
In its opinion, the Commission explained that the complainant's application had been rejected on the grounds that preparatory and followup work for the plenary sessions must have required more than mere a4 endance during the sessions.
In its decision, the Commission explained that disclosure of the documents in Cases T-209/01, T-210/01 and C-203/03 would adversely affect the pending court proceedings, harming inter alia its position as a party and the serenity of the debate.
In the case of Hungary, as the Commission explained to the Court that the adoption of decrees or laws has typically been monitored and verified based on the reliable web-based legal repository of the parliament and the Hungarian Official Journal(accessible free of charge).
The Commission explained that it had initiated infringement proceedings not because public libraries in Spain lend books free of charge but because the Spanish authorities had failed to ensure that authors were remunerated for the lending of their works through public libraries.
The Commission explained that the aim of this aspect of the proposal is to simplify the administrative and co-ordination arrangements between the national and European level, and in turn to facilitate Member States' action for joined-up services to individuals.
In this letter, the Commission explained that the basis for the opening of these official consultations related to the safety performance of Iraqi Airways under the SAFA programme as well as to the negative decision made by EASA in respect to Iraqi Airways' application for a TCO Authorisation.
The Commission explained that:“given the acknowledged difficulty surrounding accurately quantifying the impact of structural reforms, a political decision was taken to follow a more generic approach, which carries the benefits of being more efficient, communicable and speedy in terms of delivery.
The Commission explained that this reduction of the adjusted error rate is largely caused by:- improvements in the Member States' control systems as a result of remedial actions implemented as from the 2014 claim year;- more up-to-date information available to the Commission allowing a reduction of previously calculated adjustments.
