Examples of using Ship-source in English and their translations into Romanian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
Ship-source pollution and criminal penalties.
Directive 2000/59/EC andits role in addressing ship-source pollution.
Ship-source pollution and penalties for infringements.
In writing.-(SV) This report recommends the amendment of an existing directive on ship-source pollution.
Ship-source pollution and penalties for infringements(debate).
The proposal for a Directive provided that ship-source pollution should be considered a criminal offence, subject to criminal penalties.
Ship-source pollution and the introduction of penalties for infringements.
The European community is competent to oblige the member states to provide for common criminal penalties in order to combat ship-source pollution.
Directive 2005/35/EC on ship-source pollution and on the introduction of penalties for infringements was adopted in 2005.
The range of amounts for fines for legal persons is similar to the one agreed on by the Council in the Framework Decision 2005/667/JHA on ship-source pollution.
This Framework Decision was adopted in 2005 to supplement Directive 2005/35/EC"on ship-source pollution and on the introduction of penalties for infringements".
Legislative proposals supplementing Directive 2008/99/EC on the protection of environment through criminal law andDirective 2009/123/EC on ship-source pollution.
Directive 2009/123/EC(amending Directive 2005/35/EC) on ship-source pollution is part of a set of EU rules to reinforce maritime safety and help prevent pollution from ships.
(3) Criminal penalties, which demonstrate social disapproval of a differentnature than administrative sanctions, strengthen compliance with the legislation against ship-source pollution in force.
This will ensure that ship-source pollution offences are dealt with in a similar manner in every Member State and that perpetrators cannot escape from prosecution for their crimes inside the EU.
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2005/35/EC on ship-source pollution and on the introduction of penalties for infringements.
I voted for the proposal on ship-source pollution as I believe it is essential to tackle this continued practice in sea transport, namely illegal discharges of polluting substances into the sea by certain ships.
Directive 2005/35/EC is a directive laying down minimum standards anddoes not prevent Member States from taking more stringent measures against ship-source pollution in conformity with international law(Article 2).
It is clear that serious ship-source pollution must be classified and punished as a criminal offence and minor ship-source pollution can be regarded a regulatory offence, so that there is a distinction between the seriousness of the two types of activity.
The Court of Justice annuls the Council Framework Decision to strengthen the criminal-law framework for the enforcement of the law against ship-source pollution due to its adoption outside the Community legislative framework.
The Council adopted a directive strengthening EU rules on ship-source pollution and on penalties for infringements, with the aim of improving maritime safety and enhancing protection of the marine environment from pollution by ships( 3664/09).
And the European Parliament and the Council adopted in October a reinforcement of the existing rules on penalties for ship-source pollution(12) following a Commission proposal earlier this year.
The EESC's opinion is sought on the amendments proposed by the Commission to the 2005 directive on ship-source pollution, in order to comply with the case law of the Court of Justice in the field of environmental crime as regards the respective competences of the Community institutions, the effectiveness of Community legislation, and the precedence of the TEC over the TEU in relation to the Community policies and objectives defined in the treaties.
As a follow-up to the ECJ case 176/03, the Commission intends to present, later in 2007,a proposal for a directive amending Directive 2005/35/EC on ship-source pollution and on the introduction of penalties for infringements.
When adopting Council Framework Decision 2005/667/JHA, the Member States unanimously agreed that ship-source pollution committed with intent, recklessly or with serious negligence should be considered a criminal offence.
Failure by Member States to implement the Directives makes it impossible to have common minimum criminal law rules for serious breaches of EU legislation on the protection of the environment and against ship-source pollution.
The Council Framework Decision to strengthen the criminal-law framework for the enforcement of the law against ship-source pollution introduces the obligation for Member States to provide for effective, dissuasive and proportionate.
The next item is the report by Luis de Grandes Pascual, on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament andof the Council amending Directive 2005/35/EC on ship-source pollution and on the introduction of penalties for infringements- C6-0142/2008-.
Ministers for justice took note of the agreement reached with the European Parliament for amending directive 2005/35/EC on ship-source pollution and the introduction of penalties for infringements, with a view to the formal adoption of the instrument at later stage.
Rapporteur.-(ES) Mr President, Vice-President of the Commission, Commissioner for Transport, Mr Tajani, President-in-Office of the Council, ladies and gentlemen,personally, I cannot imagine a greater finishing touch to the end of this parliamentary term than the adoption of this proposal for a directive on ship-source pollution and the introduction of penalties, including criminal penalties for pollution offences, which I hope will receive everyone's support.