Examples of using Accept article in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It could therefore accept article 7 bis.
She could accept article 18, but considered that article 19 should be deleted.
He could therefore accept article 7 bis.
He could accept article 43 provided that it did not give the Prosecutor ex officio powers.
Liechtenstein could therefore not accept Article 41 of the Convention.
He could accept article 115, though paragraph 2 and the bracketed paragraph could be merged.
The representative of Tupaj Amaru could not accept Article 5 because it was not a provision.
He could accept article 10 of the“Further option” if the wording in square brackets in paragraph 2 was retained.
Mr. ONKELINX(Belgium) said that his delegation could accept article 20 with option 1 for paragraph 1, subparagraph c.
She could accept article 18 but, while appreciating the intent behind article 19, was inclined to agree that it was best deleted.
The document for discussion on article 13 stated that some States could accept article 13 as originally drafted.
Otherwise, he could accept article 22 with the amendments suggested.
The representatives of Costa Rica, Cuba, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, Norway, Peru andSweden said that they could accept article 3 as drafted.
Her Government could accept article 3 in its current wording, but was open to further discussion.
With that clarification andthe inclusion of a specific time limit, she could accept article 10 in the“Further option for articles 6, 7, 10 and 11”.
He could accept article 15 with that change, and understood that there needed to be flexibility as to reliefs that could be granted.
The representatives of Denmark said that she could accept article 11 as drafted but also welcomed two of the proposals made by Norway.
He could accept article 16, subject to improved drafting,article 17 with the deletion of paragraph 6, and article 18, but considered that article 19 should be deleted.
He could accept the text proposed by the United States for article 16, subject to the same reservation regarding criteria for determining unwillingness, andcould also accept article 18.
The Government of the United States cannot accept article VII relating to diplomatic protection and the exhaustion of remedies.
It was noted that the meaning of the terms"ethnocide and cultural genocide" in the chapeau of article 7 were not clear to many States andthose terms needed clarification before all States could accept article 7.
Mr. JANDA(Czech Republic)said that his delegation could accept article 20 with the deletion of the phrase in square brackets in paragraph 1(b) and with option 1 for paragraph 1(c), including the bracketed text.
As the text under consideration failed to articulate accordingly the rights and obligations enshrined in the Charterof the United Nations, her delegation could not accept article 33 and requested that it should be put to the vote.
The observer for Finland stated that his Government could accept article 25 but that article 26 should be flexibly drafted to allow for national solutions for the ownership of lands.
All indigenous representatives who took the floor on these articles expressed support for the draft declaration as adopted by the Sub-Commission; however,one indigenous organization stated that it could not accept article 29 in its present form.
Some States could accept article 13 as drafted, while other States had raised the issue of trying to balance indigenous peoples' rights with third party rights, referring to examples in domestic laws.
The document for discussion of article 1 stated that some States could accept article 1 as originally drafted and that international human rights instruments generally guarantee rights of individuals.
It could accept article 4, stressing the need for a strict respect for the condition"if necessary", and article 8, paragraph 4, noting that the concept of"reasonableness" did not in any way imply a new interpretation of the Covenant.
Ms. LOIZIDOU(Observer for Cyprus)said that she could accept article 4 as drafted, but suggested that the title should refer to“competent authorities” in the plural, since more than one authority might be involved.
He could not accept article 19 as it stood, since it would constitute a clear violation of the principle ne bis in idem and was hard to reconcile with current rules governing procedure, cooperation and enforcement.