Examples of using Bruni asked in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Mr. Bruni asked whether the Convention had been applied by the courts since 2010.
Mr. Bruni asked whether an agenda had been drawn up for the Sion meeting.
Mr. Bruni asked for clarification regarding the composition of the regional groups to which Ms. Gaer had referred.
Mr. Bruni asked whether the provisions of international treaties were enforceable in the State party or not.
Mr. Bruni asked for further clarification regarding measures to combat acts of torture committed within Monaco.
Mr. Bruni asked why measures for incorporating the provisions of the Convention into domestic law had not yet been adopted.
Mr. Bruni asked about the outcome of visits to places of detention, and whether any programme or planning was in place.
Mr. Bruni asked whether the Convention had ever been invoked in Kenyan courts and whether it had constituted the basis for any legal decisions since 2010.
Mr. Bruni asked whether the State party was considering making a declaration under article 22 of the Convention concerning the individual complaints procedure.
Mr. Bruni asked how measures could be taken to ensure the impartiality and independence of doctors who visited detainees in prisons, police stations and anti-terrorism departments.
Mr. Bruni asked why it had taken the State party so long to set up the national preventive mechanism required under the Optional Protocol to the Convention.
Mr. Bruni asked the delegation to confirm reports of the planned closures of 11 of the State party's 29 prisons, which would aggravate overcrowding in the remaining facilities.
Mr. Bruni asked whether a date had been set for the establishment of the national preventive mechanism, which should have taken place in 2006 in accordance with the provisions of the Optional Protocol.
Mr. Bruni asked whether the State party intended to discontinue the practice of solitary cells as a disciplinary measure, which had devastating psychological consequences for detainees.
Mr. Bruni asked whether the audit carried out in the wake of a prisoner revolt in January 2013 in protest of abominable prison conditions in Aleg prison had led to improvements.
Mr. Bruni asked whether the High Commissioner's report was likely to contain specific recommendations or whether it would merely summarize the main positions adopted during the various consultation meetings.
Mr. Bruni asked whether there was any clear legal or administrative procedure under which subordinates could challenge an order from their superiors if the subordinates perceived the order to be unlawful.
Mr. Bruni asked whether the Committee intended to include further information in paragraph 21 regarding measures to improve the effectiveness of its working methods in response to General Assembly resolution A/65/204.
Mr. Bruni asked for more information on the current number of inmates in Special Foreigner Hosting Centres and how that compared with their official capacity, and for details on their conditions of detention.
Mr. Bruni asked whether the findings of the Ombudsman's visits as national preventive mechanism to places of detention had been analysed and, if so, what areas the analysis had identified for priority attention.
Mr. Bruni asked why the maximum prison sentence for acts of torture was only 3 years and whether the State party planned to amend the relevant provisions to establish penalties commensurate with the seriousness of such acts.
Mr. Bruni asked what role national preventive mechanisms played in determining the choice of countries for follow-up visits and to what extent interaction between the Subcommittee and national preventive mechanisms influenced decisions on follow-up action.
Mr. Bruni asked whether the Detention Facilities Visiting Committees could make unannounced visits and whether the State party intended to implement the Human Rights Committee's recommendation to inform persons on death row and their families of the date and time of their execution.
Mr. Bruni asked whether the definition of the crime of torture included in the Criminal Code of Finland, which provided for prison sentences of 2 to 12 years, covered all eventualities, including cases in which torture led to permanent incapacity, or whether there were separate provisions for such a situation.
Mr. Bruni asked what the competence of the courts was with regard to cases of torture occurring on Monegasque territory, and whether the Monegasque authorities had considered implementing the recommendation of the European Committee on the Prevention of Torture to specify penalties for the crime of torture under criminal law.
Mr. Bruni asked for information about the criteria used to determine the compensation awarded to victims of human rights violations committed in the past. More specifically, he would like to know whether the severity of the injury suffered was taken into account when deciding whether or not to award compensation and, where applicable, determining the amount.
Mr. Bruni asked whether the legislative provision mentioned in the State party's report, according to which an order by a superior or a State body could not serve as a justification for torture(CAT/C/TKM/1, para. 30), had ever been invoked during a trial, and whether there was a procedure in Turkmenistan whereby a subordinate could challenge an order that would lead to acts or torture or that was perceived by the subordinate as such.
The CHAIRMAN asked Mr. Bruni Celli to submit a concrete proposal for a new question to be added to the list of issues.
Mr. SØRENSEN(Committee Rapporteur),introducing the report, asked Mr. Bruni(Secretary of the Committee) to read out the corrections to chapter I, Organizational and other matters CAT/C/XX/CRP.1.
Mr. Bruni(Country Rapporteur) asked whether legislative amendments were required before the Optional Protocol entered into force in Curaçao and Aruba.