Examples of using Community priority in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The community priority evaluation is an independent analysis.
Responses may be scored in a community priority evaluation.
The community priority(comparative) evaluation is an independent analysis.
A prerequisite for education and development, a community priority and a human right.
Results of each community priority evaluation will be posted when completed.
People also translate
Scores received in the applicant reviews are not carried forward to the community priority evaluation.
The community priority(comparative) evaluation is an independent analysis.
Each application participating in the community priority evaluation begins with a score of zero.
The panel's role is to determine whether any of the communitybased applications fulfills the community priority criteria.
Criteria and scoring methodology for the comparative(community priority) evaluation are described in Module 4 of the Applicant Guidebook.
A community priority evaluation will take place only if a community-based applicant in a contention set elects this option.
Only community-based applicants are eligible to participate in a community priority evaluation.
If a community priority(comparative) evaluation occurs but does not produce a clear winner, an auction will take place to resolve the contention.
An application must score at least 14 points to prevail in a community priority evaluation.
Community Priority Evaluation Community priority evaluation will only occur if a community-based applicant selects this option.
Responses may be scored, in a comparative(community priority) evaluation, if applicable.
As the community priority(comparative) evaluation includes assessment of relevant support and opposition, such comments are relevant to the task.
Refer to Section 4.2 of Module 4 for circumstances in which a community priority evaluation may take place.
Before the community priority evaluation begins, the applicants who have elected to participate may be asked to provide additional information relevant to the community priority evaluation.
Additional information may be requested in the event of a community priority evaluation refer to Ssection 4.2 of Module 4.
Comments designated for the Community Priority Panel, as relevant to the criteria in Module 4,may be taken into account during a Community Priority Evaluation.
An application that prevails in a contention resolution procedure, either community priority evaluation or auction, may proceed to the next stage.
Community Priority(Comparative) Evaluation Community priority(cComparative) evaluation will only occur if a community-based applicant has selectsed this option in its application.
As described elsewhere in this guidebook,cases of contention might be resolved by community priority evaluation or an agreement among the parties.
In the event of a community priority evaluation(see Module 4, String Contention Procedures), ICANN will provide the comments received during the public comment period to the evaluators with instructions to take the relevant information into account in reaching their conclusions.
If community-based, an applicant has the option to elect a comparative(community priority) evaluation in the event of string contention.
Draft Applicant Guidebook v32- For Discussion Only 4-7 Only community-based applicants are eligible to participate in may elect a community priority(comparative) evaluation.
Applicants who are eliminated as a result of a community priority evaluation are eligible for a partial refund of the gTLD evaluation fee see Module 1.
Making this change will make the procedure more sensitive while still providing a bright line between those applications that merit community priority and those that do not.
String contention cases are resolved either through a community priority(comparative) evaluation(if a community-based applicant elects it) or through an auction.