Examples of using Creationists in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
Bart and Lisa were fighting like creationists and common sense.
Ahem, again, creationists are the ones standing on the side of science.
Usually they seem to come from young people who want creationists put in their place.
All you creationists do is blow chances at getting laid.
Gentry has had strong disagreements with other creationists over some details of flood geology.
Creationists have Certainty without any proof. C.E. Montague.
There is clearly no evidence that rain caused the Flood and modern creationists have never contended this.
Creationists stand on the side of testable-repeatable science.
Evolutionists have been known to fly into a rage when creationists later publish just where the dated carbon came from.
In response, creationists have disputed the level of scientific support for evolution.
Please recall that the founders of modern science were all creationists, such as Newton, Kepler, Pascal, Boyle, Galileo and many others.
These creationists argue for an"initial cause"(or"First Cause"), i.e.
The interpretation(or belief) that they all died off millions andmillions of years ago is in dispute between creationists and evolutionists.
Thus I encounter creationists who have never heard of endogenous retroviruses.
Creationists, standing with science, would contend that the evidence strongly suggests otherwise.
A common claim of creationists is that evolution has never been observed.
Now creationists say the second law of thermodynamics doesn't allow order to arise from disorder.
Pastafarians have engaged in disputes with creationists, including in Polk County, Florida, where they played a role in dissuading the local school board from adopting new rules on teaching evolution.
Creationists claim that evolution relies on certain types of evidence that do not give reliable information about the past.
He has debated"deniers of evolution"(young-earth creationists and intelligent design proponents), including young earth creationists Duane Gish and Kent Hovind and intelligent design proponents William Dembski and Jonathan Wells.
Creationists don't publish for scientific peer review, proving that they're not doing good science, right?
But other creationists, like those contributing to this web site have continued learning.
Creationists point out that in the past, major scientific revolutions have overturned theories that were at the time considered near-certain.
Because for creationists, it means that the idea of evolution, life arising from chaos, contradicts the second law.
Creationists believe that God created all forms of life on earth(including humans), endowing non-living matter with life through a deliberate, supernatural act.
And when creationists show that evolution stands against scientific evidence the evolutionists get angry.
Some creationists bend strongly towards accepting most of the evolutionary interpretations but stop at the point of life falling together all by itself in the first place.
Creationists have often maintained that Social Darwinism-leading to policies designed to reward the most competitive-is a logical consequence of"Darwinism" the theory of natural selection in biology.
Creationists scrape some carbon off and periodically send samples to labs for(C14) dating; the results show the dinosaur-associated carbon to be a maximum of only thousands of years old.
Maybe they were a creationist.