Examples of using Draft norms in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Draft norms on the responsibilities of.
NGOs generally welcomed the draft norms.
The draft norms have been annexed to the present report.
The stakeholders critical of the draft Norms argued that.
Draft norms on Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and.
Mr. Weissbrodt presented the draft Norms and the Commentary.
Annex: Draft norms on Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations.
Another NGO provided a letter with criticisms of the draft Norms.
Amendments to the draft Norms were proposed by Mr. Eide and Mr. Yokota.
The Commentary provided a practical interpretation of the draft Norms.
Mr. Seglem stated that the draft Norms were operational at a practical level.
Several experts also discussed the binding character of the draft norms.
Those stakeholders welcoming the draft Norms argued that they.
The way forward was perhaps to include an annex or commentary to the draft norms.
The draft norms do not include a specific paragraph or chapter on indigenous peoples.
Several non-governmental organizations spoke in support of the draft Norms.
Paragraph 12 of the draft norms had been amended to include the right to drinking water.
Mr. Weissbrodt then considered several of the most significant measures in the draft norms.
The first is whether the draft norms sufficiently address indigenous peoples' concerns.
Another NGO requested specific reference to the protection of indigenous peoples in the draft norms.
Draft norms submitted by the Working Group on the Working Methods and.
The NGO also suggested a reference to gender mainstreaming in the draft Norms and Commentary.
Mr. Yokota noted that the draft Norms might not have much chance of being adopted by the Human Rights Council.
The draft Norms duplicate other initiatives and standards, particularly the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the ILO Tripartite Declaration.
The members of the working group agreed on final amendments to the draft Norms and Commentary in private session after the second session of the working group on 31 July 2003.
The draft Norms require business to undertake balancing decisions more appropriate to the role of Governments.
Several NGOs welcomed the transparent consultative process used to develop the draft norms, although one representative of a corporate group stated that business involvement in the drafting process had been lacking.
The draft Norms, whether binding or not, had not resolved the problem of human rights violations of transnational corporations.
Second, he stated that paragraph 2 of the draft Norms concerning non-discrimination included the comments made on gender mainstreaming.
Another NGO supported the draft norms, noting that without them, transnational corporations could continue to act with impunity.