Examples of using Functional language in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The functional languages community moved to standardize ML and Lisp.
Scala smoothly integrates features of object-oriented and functional languages.
Iteration(looping) in functional languages is usually accomplished via recursion.
We can port even more complicated problems from mathematics directly to a functional language.
Julia is a new homoiconic functional language focused on technical computing.
People also translate
Another line of descent from ISWIM is to strip out the imperative features(assignment and the J operator)leaving a purely functional language.
The functional language involved in such a discussion focuses around two key areas.
They are sometimes used for doing I/O operations in functional languages in lieu of monads.
Purely functional languages like Haskell, as well as non-purely functional languages like R, use call by need.
The AVL-tree operators are usually presented in functional languages in compact and elegant stile.
As a purely functional language, Unlambda's functions are first-class objects, and are the only such objects.
QUESTION: You mentioned at the beginning that a functional language, like recipes, are computer programs.
Plutus is a typed functional language based on concepts from Haskell, which can be used to write custom transaction scripts.
To close the gap between Core Clean, a high-level functional language, and machine code, the ABC-machine is used.
The functional model is also distinct from other similarly named concepts, including the DAPLEX functional database model and functional language databases.
Lazy evaluation is used by default in several pure functional languages, including Miranda, Clean, and Haskell.
Elixir is a modern functional language built on top of the Erlang VM. It's fully compatible with Erlang, but features a more standard syntax and many more features.
The article deals with parsing the language and its implementation in the functional language F, as well as the example of the designed algorithm for generating the tasks in GILT.
In a functional language(Scheme) the same function could be defined:(define square(lambda(x)(* x x))) This is different in many ways, but it still uses the formal parameter x in the same way.
It is generally considered that object-oriented(OO) languages provide weaker support for generic programming(GP) as compared with functional languages such as Haskell or SML.
One of the implementation approaches to functional languages is given by the machinery based on supercombinators, or an SK-machine, by D. Turner.
Although the idea looks attractive andthere have been attempts to implement it with the use of logical and functional languages, its future outline is still not clear.
However, C is a poor choice for functional languages: it does not guarantee tail call optimization, or support accurate garbage collection or efficient exception handling.
The only difference from the standard binomial tree is that we have let j be both positive and negative, which is mathematically natural, andhence simplifies the notation in a functional language.
This article describes the features of the system macro functional language Common Lisp, which is interesting both for developers of software applications, and for analysts of abstract programming.
A notable semantic feature was the ability to define new data types, as a(possibly recursive) sum of products- this was done using a somewhat verbosenatural language style description, but apart from notation amounts exactly to the algebraic data types found in modern functional languages.
In this section we compare how particular programming idioms are handled in a functional language with first-class functions(Haskell) compared to an imperative language where functions are second-class citizens C.
The early functional language Lisp took the approach of dynamic scoping, where non-local variables refer to the closest definition of that variable at the point where the function is executed, instead of where it was defined.
KRC(Kent Recursive Calculator) is a lazy functional language developed by David Turner from November 1979 to October 1981 based on SASL, with pattern matching, guards and ZF expressions now more usually called list comprehensions.
In purely functional languages there is typically no semantic difference between the two strategies(since their data structures are immutable, so there is no possibility for a function to modify any of its arguments), so they are typically described as call by value even though implementations frequently use call by reference internally for the efficiency benefits.