Examples of using It argued in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It argued that no amnesty had ever been given by the Government.
Citing the issues of the country's legal framework as an example, it argued that those issues do not always translate into violations of human rights.
It argued that the regime's response to those demands was a dangerous one.
In addition, it argued that a common understanding of this matter would strengthen the Convention.
It argued that a retrial would constitute an effective remedy.
People also translate
Accordingly, it argued, the selection process should be based on harmony and consensus.
It argued that the measures met the requirement of the preamble to Article XX.
Specifically, it argued that article 9(2) required that the parties expressly agree not to be bound by customary usage.
It argued that culture could help to promote or hinder rapid economic growth.
The domestic case, it argued, is much broader in subject-matter than the investigation of the Court, but encompasses it nonetheless.
It argued that, pursuant to article 50 CISG, it was entitled to reduce the price to zero.
It argued that States had a sovereign right to decide who could be permitted to enter their jurisdiction.
It argued that the domestic courts had evaluated the facts in a legitimate manner and with due care and diligence.
It argued that the buyer had thereby conceded that the shipments at issue conformed to the contracts.
It argued for a reversal of the Latin American guerrilla war orientation adopted at the Ninth World Congress.
It argued that Islamophobia reveals not only a campaign of religious intolerance but a new form of racism.
Finally, it argued that the lower court incorrectly found that the supplier had properly mitigated its damages.
It argued that the intersections between gender-based discrimination and other forms of discrimination were too often overlooked.
First, it argued that under the terms of the Treaty, termination was proper only through one year's written notice.
It argued for the urgent need to make progress on the legal and ethical questions of the peaceful use of outer space.
It argued that the author could have filed a constitutional complaint pursuant to article 79(1) of the new Polish Constitution of 2 April 1997.
Moreover, it argued that, because it claimed sovereignty, the principle of self-determination could not apply to the decolonization of Gibraltar.
It argued that the ACG project and the Shah Deniz project were located offshore in the Caspian Sea, to which Armenia had no direct access.
It argued that the Commission did not send out the complete 80-page text of the proposal before the election, which is required by law.
It argued that it is inadmissible, because the complainant did not appeal against the decisions taken by the interim relief judge see paragraph 2.4 above.
It argued that the proposed cease-fire should be based on an agreement between the warring parties that would be brokered by the United Nations.
It argued that this request was based on the complainant's statement that he had exhausted all domestic remedies, which was contested by the State party.
Subsidiarily it argued that,“by constructing certain works contrary to the terms of the Treaty, the Applicant has forfeited the right to invoke the Treaty against the Respondent”.
It argued that recognition as a foreign main proceeding was necessary to assist in its investigating and pursuing assets of A and its related entities in the United States.
It argued that the ultimate settlement of certain cases in favour of the United Nations clearly indicated that the interests of the United Nations were well-served.
