Examples of using Pre-draft in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Crisis of pre-draft preparation of the youth.
The World Intellectual Property Organization proposed to add the following second paragraph to article 23 of the pre-draft declaration, based on article 27, paragraph(2), of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Pre-draft declaration on human social responsibilities.
In these circumstances, the problem of the participation of society in pre-draft preparation including the moral and psychological one grows increasingly important.
The pre-draft declaration is contrary to this principle.
JS1 also noted that a working group of experts has prepared a pre-draft for a comprehensive child rights law during 2010-2011, which is under continual discussion.
Pre-draft declaration on human social responsibilities.
By letters dated 3 and4 August 2004, OHCHR circulated the pre-draft declaration to Member States and to intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, requesting their views on it.
Pre-draft declaration on human social responsibilities 20.
He will provide succinct reasoning for each responsibility he considers necessary to include in the articles of the pre-draft declaration on human social responsibilities, included in this report annex I.
The pre-draft declaration is an attempt to bridge the gap between the concepts of law and morality.
The fact that most of 28. According to the Government of Switzerland,the main objective of the pre-draft declaration is to condition human rights, making their exercise and enjoyment dependent on the fulfilment of social responsibilities.
The pre-draft declaration may undermine this principle and also the principle that individuals are entitled to enjoy the same human rights without discrimination of any kind.
The Commission will have before it the report of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights containing a compilation of the essential aspects of the replies received on the pre-draft declaration on human social responsibilities E/CN.4/2005/99.
Various specific articles in the pre-draft declaration would conflict with and violate the existing international human rights obligations of all States.
In its decision 2004/117, the Commission on Human Rights requested the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights(OHCHR)to solicit views of Member States, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations on the pre-draft declaration on human social responsibilities.
Further, the pre-draft declaration would purport to subordinate the enjoyment of human rights to the performance of these duties and to other vague and undefined interests of society.
The Governments of Albania, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain andNorthern Ireland submitted a joint comment in which they expressed the view that the pre-draft declaration is contrary to the principles on which the international human rights system is built.
The Ministry of Communications andTransport BiH prepared the pre-draft Law on Electronic Communications, which, in the opinion of the Agency, threatens to overturn a significant portion of its regulatory authorities.
In this sense, the pre-draft declaration is seen as an extension and a development of the fundamental international human rights instruments, and in particular of article 29 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The European Union took the view that the pre-draft declaration could be seen as conditioning respect for human rights and providing the basis for selective observation of human rights standards.
The pre-draft declaration can be seen as an extension and development of the fundamental international legal instruments in the field of human rights, including, first and foremost, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and notably its article 29.
According to the Government of the United States of America, the pre-draft declaration, by attempting to condition the exercise of human rights on the fulfilment of"responsibilities" to the State or to the community, would eviscerate the very birthright of individuals throughout the world.
The pre-draft declaration promotes the idea that States can decide to what extent an individual may enjoy his or her human rights and thereby undermines the responsibility of States to protect human rights, which is contrary to the very essence of human rights law.
In the view of the Government of Canada,the main thrust of the pre-draft declaration runs contrary to the purpose of the Commission on Human Rights, which is to promote universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction.
The first article of the pre-draft declaration wrongly links"duties" and"responsibilities" of the individual, which are two different notions as set forth in article 29 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
According to the Government of France, the pre-draft declaration is contrary to the principle of inalienability of human rights as it conditions the recognition of human rights on respect for rules established by a State.
Other respondents consider the pre-draft declaration as an instrument that contributes to the awareness that the individual has both rights and duties towards the society, and that there exists a close link between them.
In the view of the Government,consideration of the pre-draft declaration would undermine the fundamental role of States in safeguarding and guaranteeing the human rights of all individuals in accordance with obligations freely assumed under international law.
That decision, together with the pre-draft declaration on human rights and human responsibilities, constitutes a direct assault on the foundations of human rights and international human rights law by claiming that such rights are conditional.