Examples of using Specific criterion in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Specific criterion for review:(a)(i) etc.
In the case of the dissolution of federal States comprising constituent units, one specific criterion represented an appropriate connection, namely, the nationality of the constituent unit.
Specific criterion(iii): The extent to which participation of stakeholders in those programmes and processes has been enhanced.
The standard of exceeding local capacity andresources for disaster relief could also be included as a specific criterion in the interest of a flexible definition that took into account the varying capacities of States for disaster relief.
Specific criterion(iii): The extent to which major groups have been encouraged to participate in developing voluntary reports.
The questionnaire invited an overall assessment of effectiveness in relation to each specific criterion; 17 of the 22 respondents(including the European Union) took the opportunity to provide an overall assessment for 1 or more criteria. .
Specific criterion(iii): The extent to which the Collaborative Partnership on Forests members have responded to the guidance of the Forum.
Contrary to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, b article 20 of which provides that"a reservation shall be considered incompatible or inhibitive if at least two thirds of the Statesparties to this Convention object to it", the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women does not offer any specific criterion of incompatibility.
Specific criterion(i): The extent to which partnerships relevant to the implementation of the IPF/IFF proposals for action have been advanced.
The questionnaire invited remarks in relation to each specific criterion, an assessment according to the various activities7 of the international arrangement8 and suggestions for quantifiable benchmarks.
Specific criterion(v): The extent to which Forum sessions provide opportunities to voluntarily report progress and lessons learned.
With a view to simplifying the provision, another proposal was made to avoid referring to any specific criterion such as"conscious and deliberate wrongdoing" and simply to indicate that"The arbitrators or[other participants in the arbitral process] shall be exempt from liability to the fullest extent possible under any applicable law for any act or omission in connection with the arbitration.
Specific criterion(ii): The extent to which the international arrangement on forests succeeds in enhancing the positioning of forests on the international agenda.
Strengthening political commitment Specific criterion(i): The extent to which high-level engagement furthers political commitment to the implementation of the IPF/IFF proposals for action by countries.
Specific criterion(iv): The extent to which progress has been made in reaching a common understanding of forest-related concepts, terminology and definitions.
The provision does not provide a specific criterion to be used in determining when the materials supplied by the buyer constitute a"substantial part" of the goods necessary to manufacture or produce the goods.
Specific criterion(ii): The extent to which trends, lessons learned, emerging issues and actions are identified and become apparent through those voluntary reports.
There was no clear and specific criterion to determine when an armed conflict had reached"a certain level of intensity" for suspending or terminating treaties as recommended by the Working Group para. 324(1)(b)(i) of the report.
Specific criterion(v): The extent to which countries have made progress in assessing the IPF/IFF proposals for action in order to determine their relevance in their national context.
Specific criterion(ii): The extent to which the international arrangement on forests has worked in a transparent and participatory manner, including through the involvement of major groups.
Specific criterion(i): The extent to which countries, the Collaborative Partnership on Forests and other actors have made progress in implementing the relevant IPF/IFF proposals for action.
Specific criterion(ii): The extent to which the international arrangement on forests has facilitated and promoted coordination and cooperation among other forest-related organizations, instruments and processes.
Specific criterion(iv): The extent to which Collaborative Partnership on Forests members have worked to strengthen countries' abilities to monitor, assess and report progress in the implementation of IPF/IFF proposals for action.
Specific criterion(vi): The extent to which countries make progress in monitoring, assessment and reporting through, inter alia, applying criteria and indicator processes or similar tools in their efforts to achieve sustainable forest management.
Specific criterion( i): The extent to which the international community, including bilateral and multilateral donors and organizations, Collaborative Partnership on Forests members and international and regional processes, have facilitated the implementation of IPF/ IFF proposals for action in developing countries and countries with economies in transition, inter alia, through the provision of financial, technical and scientific resources and capacity-building.
Introduce specific criteria for accelerated promotion". see para. 21 above.
Had specific criteria been established in that regard?
II. Specific criteria for the review of the effectiveness of the international arrangement on forests.
The specific criteria that we have suggested are obviously neither definitive nor exhaustive.
Specific criteria cover collection, recycling, reuse and disposal.