Examples of using Two arbitrators in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Two arbitrators appointed by the parties shall elect the third member of the arbitral tribunal.
Being unable to agree on various issues, the two arbitrators had delegated their authority to the third arbitrator. .
Two arbitrators from Kazakhstan received an invitation to the European Championship among girls under 17 years.
Each party shall appoint one arbitrator, and the two arbitrators so appointed shall appoint a third, who shall be the Chairman.
The two arbitrators rendered an award in favour of the claimant who moved to have it recognized and declared enforceable.
Each Party shall appoint one arbitrator and the two arbitrators so appointed shall appoint a third who shall be the chairman.
The statement on the revision of the arbitration agreement proposed a possible interpretation concerning the appointment of the two arbitrators without IHK-membership.
The two arbitrators thus appointed shall choose the third arbitrator who will act as the presiding arbitrator of the arbitral tribunal.
Each Party shall appoint one arbitrator, and the two arbitrators so appointed shall elect a third arbitrator, who shall be the Chairperson.
If the two arbitrators cannot agree on the choice of the third(presiding) arbitrator, the appointing authority can be called upon to appoint the third arbitrator under article 9, paragraph 3.
Each Party shall appoint one arbitrator and the two arbitrators thus appointed shall together appoint a third arbitrator as their chairman.
The two arbitrators thus appointed shall, after consultation with the parties should they so decide, choose the third arbitrator who will act as presiding arbitrator of the arbitral tribunal.
There shall be three arbitrators: each party shall choose one arbitrator and, if the two arbitrators are not able to agree on a third arbitrator, the third shall be chosen by the ICC.
Each Party shall choose two arbitrators, and the fifth, who shall be the President of the Tribunal, shall be chosen by the four arbitrators who were chosen by the Parties.
Mr. Jaeger(Observer for the Comité Français de l'Arbitrage)pointed out that the text of paragraph 1 did not provide for the two arbitrators appointed by the parties to consult with the parties prior to choosing the president of the arbitral tribunal.
The courts had found that two arbitrators had not disclosed the fact that they and the signatories of the expert opinion submitted to ICAC by the claimant had a professional relationship within the same educational and scientific institutions.
The Court found that the way in which the chairman of the panel had been appointed was inconsistent with the Tribunal's procedure, since the two arbitrators appointed by each of the parties were not given the opportunity to agree on the appointment of a chairman.
If the two arbitrators are unable to reach agreement, in the two months following their appointment, on the choice of the third arbitrator, either Party may invite the President of the International Court of Justice to make the necessary appointment.
Any dispute between the social partners and between them and the Association or its agencies, will be submitted, in all cases not prohibited by law and the exclusion of any other jurisdiction, the judgment of an arbitration panel of three arbitrators, amicable,two of which are to be appointed by each of the disputing parties and the third by the two arbitrators so appointed or, in case of disagreement, by the President of the Court of Como.
The court therefore concluded that the first two arbitrators did not comply with the appointment requirements set out in the arbitration clause and set aside the award.
It was observed that, if, during arbitral proceedings before a three-member tribunal, one of the members should resign out of bad faith, perhaps in collusion with one of the parties, it might be unfair to delay proceedings in order to permit replacement of that arbitrator, andthat in some cases the remaining two arbitrators should be able to continue the proceedings and decide the case as a“truncated” tribunal.
If this proves impossible, the court shall appoint two arbitrators to endeavour constantly to bring about reconciliation between the spouses for a period of not more than thirty days.
Should the first two arbitrators fail to agree upon the appointment of the third arbitrator within three months following the appointment of the first two arbitrators, the Chairman shall be chosen by the Secretary-General of the United Nations upon the request of the Tribunal or the State Party.
In order to avoid draft article 9 being construed as precluding such consultation, which was said to occur in practice,it was proposed to amend the second sentence of draft article 9, paragraph 1, as follows:"The two arbitrators thus appointed shall, after consultation with the parties should the arbitrators so decide, choose the third arbitrator who will act as presiding arbitrator of the arbitral tribunal.
Specifically, the parties' agreement stated that the two arbitrators, appointed by each party, shall appoint the third arbitrator, and that the arbitral award given by the arbitral tribunal by agreement of two or three arbitrators shall be considered as final.
Two arbitrators appointed in accordance with the rules of this article by the parties or by a competent person(body) on their behalf, within three calendar days shall select the third arbitrator of the arbitral tribunal consisting of three arbitrators from the Official Register of the Arbitration Court judges.
According to the court,the fact that the arbitral tribunal only comprised two arbitrators until the third arbitrator was appointed two days before the arbitral award was issued may appear to be in violation of the parties' agreement.
Two arbitrators appointed in accordance with the established rules by the parties or by a competent person(body) on their behalf, within three calendar days shall elect the third arbitrator of the arbitral tribunal consisting of three arbitrators from among the persons listed in the Official Register of the Arbitration Court judges.
If within 30 days after the appointment of the second arbitrator the two arbitrators have not agreed on the choice of the presiding arbitrator, the presiding arbitrator shall be appointed by the appointing authority in the same way as a sole arbitrator would be appointed under article 8.
Should the first two arbitrators fail to agree upon the appointment of the third arbitrator within three months following the appointment of the first two arbitrators, the third arbitrator shall be chosen by the President of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea upon the request of the Secretary-General or the other party to the dispute.