Examples of using Potency test in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Batch potency test.
Antigenic units as determined in the in vitro potency test(ELISA).
Relative Potency by a mice potency test compared to a reference vaccine that was shown efficacious in sheep.
Corresponds with≥ 30 IU/mlguinea pig serum in the Ph. Eur. potency test.
Date of last potency test;
AU/ml(Antigenic units determined by ELISA)(1400AU corresponding to≥ 492 AU in the potency test).
The Marketing Authorisation(s) should be varied to reduce the variability of the serological potency test in mice by appropriate measures such as thereplacement of the use of a reference vaccine in the serological potency test in mice with the use of reference serum.
Antibody titre obtained according to the in vivo potency test in chickens.
Flocculation equivalents; corresponds with≥ 30 IU/ mlguinea pig serum in the Ph. Eur. potency test.
The distinction between what might be protective titres of antibodies andthe level of antibodies generated under the conditions of the batch potency test should be taken into account and the minimum potency at the time of batch release should be sufficient to provide the claimed duration of immunity.
Antigenic units 2 Flocculation equivalents; corresponds with≥ 30 IU/ mlguinea pig serum in the Ph. Eur. potency test.
However, it is important to ensure that the pass limits of the potency test do not drift from the original.
Antigenic units 4 Flocculation equivalents; corresponds with≥ 30 IU/ mlguinea pig serum in the Ph. Eur. potency test.
No information has been provided on the steps taken to ensure the equivalence of results obtained from tests on the final product,conducted at Boxmeer and Salamanca,(e. g. for the batch potency tests and HI and HA tests) and reassurances should be provided on the equivalence of tests and test results from the two sites.
The expiry date of a reagent in the liquid form as given on thelabel shall be not more than one year from the date of the last satisfactory potency test.
However, it was important to ensure that the pass limits of the potency test do not drift from the original.
Inactivated whole avian influenza virus antigen of H7N1 subtype(strain, A/ CK/ Italy/ 473/ 99),inducing an HI titre of≥ 6.0 log2 as tested according to the potency test.
The referral deals with the issue that in the opinion of France equivalence between thereference vaccine batch for the erysipelas batch potency test validated in the original dossier and the new reference vaccine batches was not shown for these 2 batches and that consequently the CVMP needed to consider whether to vary, withdraw or suspend the marketing authorisation.
Porcine circovirus type 2 ORF2 subunit antigen:at least 4.5 log2 ELISA units(as determined in the in vivo potency test in chickens).
There are important outstanding issues regarding the differences of production and control between the manufacturing sites(including the nature of the eggs used)and the lack of a validation study for the potency test on finished product(it appears that final producttests are only done at Weesp but in-process tests such as titration and HA quantification need to be equivalent too).
Inactivated whole avian influenza virus antigen of H5N2 subtype(strain A/ duck/ Potsdam/ 1402/ 86),inducing an HI titre of≥ 6.0 log2 as tested according to the potency test.
Relative Potency unitdetermined by ELISA antigen quantification(in vitro potency test) compared to a reference vaccine.
Inactivated whole avian influenza virus antigen of H5 subtype(strain H5N6, A/ duck/ Potsdam/ 2243/ 84),inducing an HI titre of≥ 6.0 log2 as tested according to the potency test.
Relative Potency unitdetermined by ELISA antigen quantification(in vitro potency test) compared to a reference vaccine.
Inactivated whole cell suspension of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale serotype A strain B3263/ 91 1 x 107cells** inducing a mean titre in the chickens of the potency test of at least 11.2(log2).
By testing cannabis-infused sweets,researchers realized that chocolate compounds could interfere with marijuana potency tests, which would lead to inaccurate results.
And for good reason, according to researchers at a laboratory based in Auckland, California, where recreational cannabis has been authorized since 2018,chocolate compounds could interfere with cannabis potency tests, which would lead to inaccurate results.