Examples of using Programme closure in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Payment of balance and programme closure.
Assessment of programme closure for the 2000-2006 programming period 5.52.
Conformity audits can be carried out, and decisions taken, after programme closure.
The financial correction mechanism, as well as the programme closure procedure, provide a means for rectifying irregular payments.
The following is an assessment of the implementation of the Guidelines on programme closure.
People also translate
Article 73 particularly relevant for the programme closure scheduled for 2017 56.
Moreover, the proposal would allow Cyprus to apply the maximum co-financing rate of 85% for Cyprus until programme closure.
Example The Commission will verify at programme closure whether this project is operational and, if not, it will apply the requisite financial correction.
Unused initial pre-financing will only be totally cleared at programme closure.
As beneficiaries arerequired to keep documents for 3 years after programme closure, DG REGIO and DG EMPL can undertake audits after closure. .
According to the Withdrawal Agreement, the CPR applies to the UK until programme closure.
They also considered that the range ofmeasures eligible for assistance was adequate and that, after programme closure, they had been able to achieve meaningful results in relation to the objectives set for the Fund.
The Commission makes controls on all expenditure severalyears after the actual year of a given payment, primarily at programme closure.
The supporting documentation to be provided by the Member State at programme closure is defined in the legal framework.
Moreover, the proposal would allow the Commission to extend the exceptional co-financing rate of85% for the ERDF and ESF in Cyprus until programme closure.
Programme closure in rural development is based on the annual accounts submitted by the Member States for each financial year in the programme period(2007 to 2015) and the corresponding acceptance by the Commission(financial clearance decisions).
The Commission repeats its comment thatexpenditure is controlled several years after the actual year of a given payment, primarily at programme closure.
In the EU's budget system, which is built on multiannual programming,we consider that programme closure should entail a final acceptance by the Commission that the expenditure for the programme period as a whole was legal and regular, account being taken of the results of all EU and national checks and audits, together with a report on programme implementation and results.
Personal information gathered during theProgramme will be used for administrative purposes only and will not be retained by the Promoter following the Programme closure.
For example, the Commission has issued a number of guidance documents to clarify the legal requirements in various areas(eligibility rules, programming,reporting, programme closure etc.) with a view to finding practical solutions, and it has had regular exchanges with the Member States on a range of implementation issues since the new programmes began; this is greatly appreciated by the Member States.
In four of the five projects considered by the Court to be totally ineligible because they were not operational,the Commission considers that the rules allow a determination on this issue only at programme closure.
This proposal may imply an acceleration in the use of payment appropriations for the programmes concerned,which would be compensated by programme closure, leaving the proposal as budgetary neutral.
To ease the pressure on the national budget and accelerate much-needed investments, it is proposed to extend the co-financing rate of 85% for all operational programmes supported by the ERDF andESF in Cyprus until programme closure.
Where financial instruments are used for funding, only disbursements made to final recipients and fund managers' costs andfees are eligible at programme closure, and unused contributions must be returned to the EU budget(32).
Conclusions and recommendations 58 Recommendation 2 In its legislative proposals for the post-2020 period, the Commission should introduce in the legislative proposals a final acceptance concerning the legality and regularity of programme expenditure and the outputs andresults achieved at programme closure.
Section 3.5‘Non-functioning projects':‘at the time of the submission of the closure documents,Member States have to ensure that all projects included in the programme closure are functioning, meaning completed and in use, so considered as eligible'.
In order to ease the pressure on the national budget of some Member States and to accelerate much-needed investments in Cyprus, the maximum contribution rate of 100% referred to in Article 59(4)(f)should be extended until the programme closure.
To ease the pressure on the national budget and accelerate much-needed investments, the co-financing rate of 85% for all operational programmes supported by the ERDF andESF in Cyprus should therefore be extended until programme closure.
In order to ease the pressure on the national budget of some Member States and to accelerate much-needed investments in Cyprus, the maximum contribution rate of 100% referred to in point(f) of Article 59(4)of that Regulation should be extended until the programme closure.
According to the closure guidelines for cohesion, at the time of submission of the closure documents,Member States have to ensure that all projects included in the programmes closure are functioning, meaning completed and in use.