Examples of using Relationship of dependency in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
- 
                        Colloquial
                    
- 
                        Official
                    
- 
                        Medicine
                    
- 
                        Financial
                    
- 
                        Ecclesiastic
                    
- 
                        Official/political
                    
- 
                        Computer
                    
- 
                        Programming
                    
A personal relationship of dependency.
So now peoplehave come to understand that they must break the relationship of dependency with the US.
The existence of  a relationship of dependency capable of  justifying a derived right of  residence under Article 20 TFEU in the main proceedings.
Five detailed sub-questions concerning the factors to be taken into account in order toassess whether a relationship of dependency exists have also been raised.
Second, it is necessary to examine the circumstances in which a relationship of dependency, capable of  justifying a derived right of  residence under Article 20 TFEU, may come into being in the joined cases in the main proceedings.
The existence of  a family link, whether natural or legal,is not sufficient to establish such a relationship of dependency.
It is an absolute relationship of dependency.
The existence of  a family link with that third-country national, whether natural or legal, is notsufficient, and cohabitation with that third-country national is not necessary, in order to establish such a relationship of dependency.”.
It is immaterial that the relationship of dependency relied on by a third-country national in support of  his application for residence for the purposes of  family reunification comes into being after the imposition on him of  an entry ban;
In this instance, in none of  the three cases in the main proceedings where the family relationship  at issue is one between adults does thefile submitted to the Court appear to suggest a relationship of dependency of  such a nature as to justify granting to the third-country national a derived right of residence under Article 20 TFEU.
The fact that the relationship of dependency relied on by the third-country national in support of  his or her application for residence for the purposes of  family reunification comes into existence after the imposition of  an entry ban on that third-country national;
(13) In order to ensure full respect for the principle of  family unity and of  the best interests of  the child,the existence of  a relationship of dependency between an applicant and his/her extended family on account of  pregnancy or maternity, their state of  health or great age, should become binding responsibility criterion.
Where there is a relationship of dependency with the third-country national concerned, a national practice such as that described in the order for reference applied automatically and with no scope for exceptions is liable adversely to affect the EU citizen's right to reside in not only the Member State of  nationality, but the EU territory as a whole.
It follows from the foregoing that Article 20 TFEU mustbe interpreted as meaning that it is immaterial that the relationship of dependency relied on by a third-country national in support of  his application for residence for the purposes of  family reunification comes into being after the imposition on him of  an entry ban.
In the case of  adults, a relationship of dependency, capable of  giving rise to a derived rightof  residence under Article 20 TFEU, is conceivable only in exceptional cases, where, having regard to all the relevant circumstances, there could be no form of  separation of  the individual concerned from the member of  his family on whom he is dependent.
The presence of  a relative(15) In order to ensure full respect for the principle of  family unity and of  the best interests of  the child,the existence of  a relationship of dependency between an applicant and his/her extended family on account of  pregnancy or maternity, their state of  health or great age, should become binding responsibility criteria.
Where the Union citizen is an adult, a relationship of dependency, capable of  justifying the grant to the third-country national concerned of  a derived right of  residence under article 20 TFEU, is conceivable only in exceptional cases, where, in the light of  all the relevant circumstances, any form of  separation of  the individual concerned from the member of  his family on whom he is dependent is not possible;
The fact that the other parent, a Union citizen is actually able and willing to assume sole responsibility for the primary day-to-day care of  the child is a relevant factor, but it is not in itself a sufficient ground for a conclusion that there is not,between the third-country national parent and the child, such a relationship of dependency that the child would be compelled to leave the territory of  the European Union if a right of  residence were refused to that third-country national.
Therefore, it cannot be accepted, above all in our contemporary societies, that the relationship of dependency between parents and children ceases immediately upon the date on which the child attains the age of  majority and can no longer be regarded as a minor child.
In such circumstances, the existence of  such a relationship of dependency between a Union citizen and third-country national, could not, by definition, have been taken into account when the return decision, accompanied by an entry ban, was adopted with respect to the third-country national.
Third, it is necessary to determine whether Article 20 TFEU mustbe interpreted as meaning that it is immaterial that the relationship of dependency relied on by a third-country national in support of  his application for residence for the purposes of  family reunification comes into being after the imposition on him of  an entry ban.
It is stated also in theorder for reference that no examination of  whether there may be a relationship of dependency between that third-country national and the Union citizen who is a family member, as set out in paragraph 52 of  this judgment, takes place until the third-country national has obtained the withdrawal or suspension of  his or her entry ban.
In order to ensure full respect for the principle of  family unity and forthe best interests of  the child, the existence of  a relationship of dependency between an applicant and his or her child, sibling or parent on account of  the applicant's pregnancy or maternity, state of  health or old age, should become a binding responsibility criterion.
The Court's case-law indicates thataccount must be taken of  whether there is a relationship of dependency between the Union citizen who is a young child and the third-country national, since that dependence may entail that the Union citizen will in fact be compelled to leave the territory of  the European Union if the third-country national on whom the child is dependent is not granted a right of  residence.
That being the case, the effectiveness of  Union citizenship would be compromised if an application for residence for the purposes of  family reunificationwere to be automatically rejected where such a relationship of dependency between a Union citizen and a third-country national family member came into being at a time when the third-country national was already the subject of  a return decision accompanied by an entry ban and was therefore aware that he was staying illegally.
If the answer is in the affirmative,what factors should be taken into account in order to assess whether there is such a relationship of dependency and, when the Union citizen is a minor, what importance should be given to the existence of  family ties, whether natural or legal, to where the Union citizen who is a national of  the Member State concerned lives and to who is responsible for the financial support of  that Union citizen;
It follows that the identification of  arelationship  between two adult members of  the same family as a relationship of dependency, capable of  giving rise to a derived rightof  residence under Article 20 TFEU, is conceivable only in exceptional cases, where, having regard to all the relevant circumstances, there could be no form of  separation of  the individual concerned from the member of  his family on whom he is dependent.”.