Examples of using Relationship of dependency in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Not in a relationship of dependency, and.
Five detailed sub-questions concerning the factors to be taken into account in order toassess whether a relationship of dependency exists have also been raised.
(77) In determining whether there is a relationship of dependency the fact that the EU citizen provides financial support for the third-country national adult child(see the case of Mr M.Z.).
The existence of a family link with that third-country national, whether natural or legal, is not sufficient, and cohabitationwith that third-country national is not necessary, in order to establish such a relationship of dependency.
There is not a relationship of dependency.
To this end, the EESC recommends drawing on European Court of Justice case-law, which has recognised the status of worker in the case of people who, although without a standard contract of employment,were carrying out an activity within a remunerated relationship of dependency;
In that sense, the CJEU has clarified the circumstances in which a relationship of dependency may justify a derived right of residence for a family member of an EU citizen who has never exercised his right of freedom of movement.
If the Court agrees with me that these seven cases fall within the scope of Article 20 TFEU and that the rules in the Return Directive should not form part of the assessment on the merits, it will be necessary for the competent authorities todetermine in each case at issue whether there is in fact a relationship of dependency between the EU citizen and the third-country national family member.
It is immaterial that the relationship of dependency relied on by a third-country national in support of his application for residence for the purposes of family reunification comes into being after the imposition on him of an entry ban;
(3) If Article 20 TFEU is engaged, the referring court asks what factorsshould be considered in assessing whether there is a relationship of dependency between the EU citizen and the third country national concerned.
It is immaterial that the relationship of dependency relied on by a third-country national in support of his application for residence for the purposes of family reunification comes into being after the imposition on him of an entry ban;
The following detailed sub-questions are posed with a view to establishing thefactors to be considered in any assessment concerning the relationship of dependency for the purposes of Article 20 TFEU, construed in the light of Article 7 of the Charter.
The fact that the relationship of dependency relied on by the third-country national in support of his or her application for residence for the purposes of family reunification comes into existence after the imposition of an entry ban on that third-country national;
(13) In order to ensure full respect for the principle of family unity and of the best interests of the child,the existence of a relationship of dependency between an applicant and his/her extended family on account of pregnancy or maternity, their state of health or great age, should become binding responsibility criterion.
Where there is a relationship of dependency with the third-country national concerned, a national practice such as that described in the order for reference applied automatically and with no scope for exceptions is liable adversely to affect the EU citizen's right to reside in not only the Member State of nationality, but the EU territory as a whole.
Third, it is necessary to determine whether Article 20 TFEU mustbe interpreted as meaning that it is immaterial that the relationship of dependency relied on by a third-country national in support of his application for residence for the purposes of family reunification comes into being after the imposition on him of an entry ban.
In such circumstances, the existence of such a relationship of dependency between a Union citizen and third-country national, could not, by definition, have been taken into account when the return decision, accompanied by an entry ban, was adopted with respect to the third-country national.
In this instance, in none of the three cases in the main proceedings where the family relationship at issue is one between adults does thefile submitted to the Court appear to suggest a relationship of dependency of such a nature as to justify granting to the third-country national a derived right of residence under Article 20 TFEU.
The Court's case-law indicates thataccount must be taken of whether there is a relationship of dependency between the Union citizen who is a young child and the third-country national, since that dependence may entail that the Union citizen will in fact be compelled to leave the territory of the European Union if the third-country national on whom the child is dependent is not granted a right of residence.
The fact that the other parent, a Union citizen is actually able and willing to assume sole responsibility for the primary day-to-day care of the child is a relevant factor, but it is not in itself a sufficient ground for aconclusion that there is not, between the third-country national parent and the child, such a relationship of dependency that the child would be compelled to leave the territory of the European Union if a right of residence were refused to that third-country national.
Therefore, it cannot be accepted, above all in our contemporary societies, that the relationship of dependency between parents and children ceases immediately upon the date on which the child attains the age of majority and can no longer be regarded as a minor child.
That being the case, the effectiveness of Union citizenship would be compromised if an application for residence for the purposes of family reunificationwere to be automatically rejected where such a relationship of dependency between a Union citizen and a third-country national family member came into being at a time when the third-country national was already the subject of a return decision accompanied by an entry ban and was therefore aware that he was staying illegally.
Where the Union citizen is a minor,the assessment of the existence of such a relationship of dependency must be based on consideration, in the best interests of the child, of all the specific circumstances, including the age of the child, the child's physical and emotional development, the extent of his emotional ties to each of his parents, and the risks which separation from the third-country national parent might entail for that child's equilibrium.
(16) In order to ensure full respect for the principle of family unity and for the best interests of the child,the existence of a relationship of dependency between an applicant and his or her child, sibling or parent on account of the applicant s pregnancy or maternity, state of health or old age, should become a binding responsibility criterion.
It follows from the foregoing that Article 20 TFEU mustbe interpreted as meaning that it is immaterial that the relationship of dependency relied on by a third-country national in support of his application for residence for the purposes of family reunification comes into being after the imposition on him of an entry ban.
If the answer is in the affirmative,what factors should be taken into account in order to assess whether there is such a relationship of dependency and, when the Union citizen is a minor, what importance should be given to the existence of family ties, whether natural or legal, to where the Union citizen who is a national of the Member State concerned lives and to who is responsible for the financial support of that Union citizen;
If the answer is in the affirmative,what factors should be taken into account in order to assess whether there is such a relationship of dependency and, when the Union citizen is a minor, what importance should be given to the existence of family ties, whether natural or legal, to where the Union citizen who is a national of the Member State concerned lives and to who is responsible for the financial support of that Union citizen;
We live in a world-wide system organized around relationships of dependency between societies, and in a dependency of variable geometry according to the nation, the time, and the dimension on which dependency is considered.
As stated, in essence,by the Advocate General in point 79 of her Opinion, such a relationship of purely financial dependency is not plainly one that would compel M.Z.