What is the translation of " DEROGATION FROM THE PRINCIPLE " in Slovenian?

• odstopanje od načela
• odstopanja od načela

Examples of using Derogation from the principle in English and their translations into Slovenian

(Please provide specific reasons for any derogation from the principle.).
(Prosimo, navedite posebne razloge za morebitna odstopanja od načela.).

As a derogation from the principle of equal treatment, Article 5(2) is to be interpreted restrictively.
Člen 5(2) je treba kot odstopanje od načela enakega obravnavanja razlagati ozko.

Article 2(3)(a) provides for a derogation from the rule of exclusion of liability contained in Article 2(2), which in turn is a derogation from the principle of liability set out in paragraph 1 of that article.
Slednja določba naj bi namreč pomenila odstopanje od pravila izključitve odgovornosti iz člena 2(2), pri čemer je ta odstopanje od načela odgovornosti iz člena 2(1).

In addition to these cases, there is also a derogation from the principle of determining the taxable amount based on the consideration in cases where:.
Poleg tega obstajajo tudi izjeme od načela določanja davčne osnove na podlagi plačila v naslednjih primerih:.

The Court points out, however, that legitimate social policy objectives, such as those related to employment policy, the labour market or vocational training, may justify a derogation from the principle prohibiting discrimination on grounds of age.
Sodišče je kljub temu opozorilo, da legitimni cilji socialne politike, kot so politika zaposlovanja, politika trga delovne sile in poklicnega usposabljanja, lahko utemeljijo odstopanje od načela prepovedi diskriminacije zaradi starosti.

(3) The need for derogation from the principle of complete information on the payer as regards batch transfers between jurisdictions.
(3) Potreba po odstopanju od načela, na podlagi katerega se zahtevajo popolni podatki o plačniku, v zvezi s paketnimi prenosi sredstev med različnimi pristojnostmi.

Where the legislator provides that, under certain conditions, a specific practice is not discriminatory, it does not create a derogation from the principle of equal treatment of comparable situations(which could only be admissible for a transitional period).
Če zakonodajalec določa, da posebna praksa pod določenimi pogoji ni diskriminatorna, s tem ne določa odstopanja od načela enakega obravnavanja primerljivih položajev(ki bi lahko bilo dopustno le v prehodnem obdobju).

As to the derogation from the principle of equal treatment in Article 24(2) of Directive 2004/38 relied on by the Republic of Austria, the Commission submits that it must be interpreted restrictively.
Komisija glede odstopanja od načela enakega obravnavanja iz člena 24(2) Direktive 2004/38, na katero se sklicuje Republika Avstrija, meni, da ga je treba razlagati ozko.

It must be pointed out that, whilst Article 24(1) of Directive 2004/38 and Article 4 of Regulation No 883/2004 reiterate the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of nationality, Article 24(2) of that directive contains a derogation from the principle of non-discrimination.
Ob tem je treba tudi poudariti, da medtem ko člen 24(1) Direktive 2004/38 in člen 4 Uredbe št. 883/2004 opozarjata na prepoved diskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva, pa člen 24(2) navedene direktive vsebuje izjemo od načela prepovedi diskriminacije.

(8) Concerning internal assigned revenue, derogation from the principle of specification should be introduced to allow optimal use of all types of appropriations available.
Kar zadeva notranje namenske prejemke, bi bilo treba uvesti odstopanje od načela specifikacije, da se omogoči optimalna poraba vseh razpoložljivih vrst odobritev.

Moreover, it does not follow from the wording of Article 7(1) of Directive 79/7 that the grounds for derogation set out therein are not exhaustive and that the Member States are free to develop other grounds for derogation from the principle of equal treatment.
Poleg tega iz besedila člena 7(1) Direktive 79/7 ni razvidno, da razlogi za odstopanje, določeni v tem členu, niso izčrpni in da lahko države članice prosto zasnujejo druge razloge za odstopanje od načela enakega obravnavanja.

Since Article 24(2) is a derogation from the principle of equal treatment provided for in Article 18 TFEU, of which Article 24(1) of Directive 2004/38 is merely a specific expression, it must be interpreted narrowly.
Komisija glede odstopanja od načela enakega obravnavanja iz člena 24(2) Direktive 2004/38, na katero se sklicuje Republika Avstrija, meni, da ga je treba razlagati ozko.

The solution proposed was to introduce a temporary option for Member States suffering from severe cash-flow difficulties to request a 100% reimbursement for financing labour market measures under the European Social Fund, that is to say, derogation from the principle of cofinancing.
Predlagana rešitev naj bi za države članice s hudimi težavami glede denarnega toka uvedla začasno možnost, da zaprosijo za 100% povračilo stroškov za financiranje ukrepov na trgu dela v okviru Evropskega socialnega sklada, kar je odstopanje od načela sofinanciranja.

( 3) the need for derogation from the principle of complete information on the payer as regards batch transfers between jurisdictions and( 4) the need for exemptions or thresholds.
( 3) potreba po odstopanju od načela, na podlagi katerega se zahtevajo popolni podatki o plačniku, v zvezi s paketnimi prenosi sredstev med različnimi pristojnostmi in( 4) potreba po izvzetjih ali pragovih.

The Commission believes that this Directive should not prohibit the possibility of introducing measures to bridge the gender gap in terms of entrepreneurship in the Member States and that the Member States must therefore be allowed to make such derogation from the principle of equal treatment.
Komisija meni, da ta direktiva ne sme preprečiti možnosti uvedbe ukrepov za premostitev razlik med spoloma v zvezi s podjetništvom v državah članicah, zato je treba državam članicam dovoliti tako odstopanje od načela enakega obravnavanja.

Those provisions cannot, however, be understood to authorise any derogation from the principles of liberty, democracy and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms enshrined in Article 6(1) EU as a foundation of the Union.
Vendar se teh določb ne more razumeti v smislu, kot da dovoljujejo izjemo od načel svobode, demokracije ter spo�tovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svobo�čin, določenih v členu 6(1) Pogodbe EU, kot temelja Unije.

As the Advocate General observed in point 24 of his Opinion, it is clear, in particular, from the case-law subsequent to Medion(EU: C: 2005:594), that the Court of Justice did not introduce, in that judgment, a derogation from the principles governing the assessment of the likelihood of confusion.
Kot je generalni pravobranilec poudaril v točki 24 sklepnih predlogov, je zlasti iz sodne prakse, sprejete po sodbi Medion(EU: C: 2005:594), razvidno, da Sodišče s to sodbo ni uvedlo izjeme od načel, ki urejajo presojo verjetnosti zmede.

The action against Evergreen was based on a‘derogation from the principle of limited liability' and the fact that Evergreen had‘undertaken' to pay Toréns and Kakelmässan or to provide Copperhill with the funds necessary to do so.
Tožba proti družbi Evergreen je temeljila na načelu spregleda pravne osebnosti in okoliščini, da naj bi se družba Evergreen„zavezala“ plačati dolgove do družb Toréns in Kakelmässan ali za ta namen nakazati sredstva družbi Copperhill.

After the split of the old Article 6(1)(i) of Directive 96/97 into two points- Article 8(1)(i) and(j) of the recast proposal- point(i) does not allow any derogation from the principle of equal treatment any more and can thus no longer be referred to as an exception in the context of Article 8(1)(d) and(k).
Po razdelitvi starega člena 6(1)(i) Direktive 96/97 v dve točki- člen 8(1)(i) in(j) prenovljenega predloga- točka(i) več ne dovoljuje odstopanja od načela enakega obravnavanja in zato ne more biti več navedena kot izjema v smislu člena 8(1)(d) in(k).

It is appropriate to observe that the derogation from the principle of open access to energy supply systems contained in the first point of Paragraph 110(1) of the EnWG is not justified by the risk that the operators of systems coming within the scope of that provision would be prevented from performing their public-service obligations by the fact of that open access.
Treba je opozoriti, da odstopanje od načela prostega dostopa do omrežij za oskrbo z energijo, navedeno v členu 110(1), točka 1, EnWG, ni utemeljeno s tveganjem, da upravljavci omrežij, ki spadajo na področje uporabe te določbe, zaradi tega prostega dostopa ne bi mogli izpolniti svojih obveznosti javnih storitev.

By that line of argument, the Republic of Poland implicitly refers to the Court's caselaw permitting a residence condition, in derogation from the principle of the exportability of social security benefits, where the benefits are‘closely linked with the social environment'.
Republika poljska se s to trditvijo posredno sklicuje na sodno prakso Sodi�ča, ki z odstopanjem od načela plačevanja dajatev iz socialne varnosti v tujino dovoljuje pogoj prebivali�ča, kadar so dajatve„tesno povezane s socialnim okoljem“ 19.

On the subject of Member State policies for the reimbursement of the cost of medicines by social insurance bodies, the Court's judgment in Merck and Beecham 53recog-nised that price setting may distort competition between Member States, but it went on to say that such a distortion brought about by State interference does not justify a derogation from the principle of free movement of goods. 54.
V zvezi s politiko, ki jo izvajajo države članice, da organi socialne varnosti povrnejo izdatke za zdravila bolnikov, je Sodi�če v sodbi Merck in Beecham 53 priznalo, da lahko nadzor cen izkrivi konkurenco med državami članicami, vendar je to trditev dodatno pojasnilo z dejstvom, da to izkrivljanje konkurence zaradi vme�avanja države ne upravičuje odstopanja od načel prostega pretoka blaga. 54.

According to the referring court, Article 67 TFEU does not repeat the derogation from the principle of freedom of movement stemming from the exception in respect of public policy and national security contained in the Convention signed at Schengen on 19 June 1990.
Po njegovem mnenju člen 67 PDEU ne vsebuje odstopanja od načela prostega gibanja, ki izhaja iz pridržka v zvezi z javnim redom ali nacionalno varnostjo, navedenega v konvenciji, ki je bila podpisana 19. junija 1990 v Schengnu.

In the present case, before even considering whether there is such an objective justification, it is appropriate, in the first place, to examine the Republic of Austria's argument to the effect that reduced transport fares for students come within the scope of the derogation from the principle of equal treatment provided for in Article 24(2) of Directive 2004/38.
Pred ugotovitvijo, ali v obravnavani zadevi obstaja tako objektivno upravičenje, je treba najprej preučiti trditev Republike Avstrije, da za sistem znižanih cen prevoza za študente velja izjema od načela enakega obravnavanja iz člena 24(2) Direktive 2004/38.

Therefore, the 2003 Accession Treaty granted the possibility- for a transitory period of up to seven years- to invoke a derogation from the principle of the free movement of workers, specifically, by allowing national restrictions on workers from all new Member States except Cyprus and Malta.
Zato je pristopna pogodba iz leta 2003 odobrila možnost- za prehodno obdobje največ sedmih let- uveljavitve odstopanja od načela prostega pretoka delavcev, in sicer tako, da se omogočijo nacionalne omejitve za delavce iz vseh novih držav članic, razen Cipra in Malte.

Although, as evidenced by paragraph 43 of the present judgment, the reduced transport fares granted to the students concerned constitute maintenance aid for them, only maintenance aid for studies‘consisting in student grants or student loans' come within the derogation from the principle of equal treatment provided for in Article 24(2) of Directive 2004/38.
Čeprav- kot je razvidno iz točke 43 te sodbe- znižanje cen prevoza, odobreno zadevnim študentom, pomeni pomoč za njihovo vzdrževanje, pa odstopanje od načela enakega obravnavanja iz člena 24(2) Direktive 2004/38 velja samo za pomoč za vzdrževanje v času študija,„ki obsega študentske pomoči ali študentska posojila“.

However, the Court of Justice of the European Union, in its ruling on the Test-Achats case(C-236/09) declared invalid the derogation from the principle of equal treatment which allowed EU countries to differentiate between men and women with regard to insurance premiums and benefits, with effect from 21 December 2012.
Toda Sodišče Evropske unije je v sodbi v zadevi Test-Achats(C-236/09) odstopanje od načela enakega obravnavanja, ki je državam EU omogočilo, da so delale razlike med moškimi in ženskami glede zavarovalnih premij in ugodnosti, razglasilo za neveljavno z začetkom veljave 21. decembra 2012.

In addition, since Section 5 constitutes a derogation from the principle, laid down in Article 2 of the Regulation, 4that the courts having jurisdiction must be those for the place where the defendant is domiciled, the rules laid down in Article 18 to 21 of Section 5 should be interpreted strictly, so that only the exceptions to the application of the principle that jurisdiction is based on the defendant's domicile that are expressly laid down in that section are allowed.
Ker poleg tega oddelek 5 pomeni odstopanje od načelne pristojnosti iz člena 2 Uredbe 4, v skladu s katerim se pristojnost določa po stalnem prebivali�ču toženca, bi bilo treba pravila iz členov od 18 do 21 oddelka 5 razlagati ozko, in sicer tako, da bi bilo mogoče sprejeti zgolj tiste izjeme od načela, da se pristojnost določa po stalnem prebivali�ču toženca, ki bi bile v tem oddelku izrecno navedene.

The Commission's view, as already indicated in its Communication on the Common Position4, remains that the opt-out is a derogation from the principle of a 48-hour working week, which can present risks to workers' health and safety, both in the short term and in the long term.
Stališče Komisije ostaja, kot je navedeno že v njenem sporočilu o skupnem stališču4, da je možnost neuporabe odstopanje od temeljnega načela največ 48-urnega tedenskega delovnega časa, ki lahko pomeni kratkoročno in dolgoročno tveganje za zdravje in varnost delavcev.

One of the measures put forward in the Commission's proposal was a derogation from the principle of cofinancing by introducing a temporary option for Member States suffering from cash-flow problems to request a 100% reimbursement for financing measures eligible under the European Social Fund.
Eden od ukrepov, ki jih je Komisija predložila v svojem predlogu, je bilo odstopanje od načela sofinanciranja z uvedbo začasne možnosti, ki je državam članicam, ki so imele težave z denarnim tokom, omogočila zahtevek za 100% povračilo finančnih ukrepov, ki so upravičeni v okviru Evropskega socialnega sklada.