Examples of using Textbox in English and their translations into Slovenian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Computer
-
Official/political
-
Programming
These terms are defined in Textbox 4.
Popular with data textbox selection combobox.
Anexample ofa designstudycan be foundin Textbox 1.
Paste your Youtube url into above textbox to get the all size of thumbnails.
An example of a CNI projectis givenin Textbox 2.
Use this textbox to edit the private key for the authentication on the NX server.
Tip: If you want to add a comment about your chart or have only one data label,you can use a textbox.
In"IP Address" textbox, fill in the IP address of the computer which has cFos Personal Net running.
Get your Video id from youtube and paste into above textbox, click the button❝Get YouTube Thumbnail❞.
The text in this textbox will be used to format long dates. The sequences below will be replaced:.
To get the video thumbnail of any YouTubeVideo enter the regular URL of the video into the textbox below.
When you select the If macro block, a textbox appears so that you can enter an expression that represents the condition you wish to test.
In the cases where shortcomings were identified,the Commission provided support in order to address these weaknesses(see Textbox 2).
Textbox 2- Example ofimpact onthe Community's financial interests First paragraph- This centralised intermediary is a ministry of the Kingdom of Morocco.
In five cases out of the 32 projects of the sample this can beexplained by underestimation of inflation(in 16% of the cases)(see Textbox 9).
The text in this textbox will be used to format short dates. For instance, this is used when listing files. The sequences below will be replaced:.
Checks were carried outfor other compounds, such as polychlorinated biphenyls(PCBs),although notrequired bythe directive(see Textbox 4).
Simply start typing it in the“Add tables” textbox and then choose from relevant tables to quickly define fields, relationships, and rules between them.
The other projectsthat atthetime ofthe audit werenot completed areconsistent with the TEN-T network(seeforexample Textbox 11 and Figure 11).
Textbox 6- Example of EU participation not adding value and not achieving its objectives Second paragraph- EU participation in the technology investment fund is an exception in the RCO portfolio.
The Commission considers that the criteria in the Regulation have been applied in theclearest possible way(see detailed comments in textbox 3).
Textbox 2 Passing the budgetary amending procedure For two flooding applications in 2005, the decision in principle was taken in December 2005 but the budget amendment was only approved in April 2006, four months later.
The other projects that at the time of the audit were not completed areconsistent with the TEN-T network(see for example Textbox 11 and Figure 11).
Furthermore, a projectis morelikely to be sustainable when there isa highlevel of ownershiponthe part ofthe beneficiaryasis illustrated in Textbox 5.
The assessment of these projects shows that, in spite of some shortcomings,they are contributing to compliance with EU environmental standards(see Textbox 10).
This budgetary amending procedure takes more than two months on average butcan increase to four months during holiday periods(see Textbox 2).
When the cost increased and no additional ISPA resources were made available,candidate countries had to finance the additional costs from their own resources(see Textbox 8).
In spite of some shortcomings, the projects that were not completed at the time of the audit, if implemented as planned,are likely to contribute to compliance with EU environmental standards(see Textbox 11).
In some cases the national ISPA strategies were a development of existing national strategies that had already taken into consideration the need toadopt the acquis communautaire in the field of the environment(see Textbox 4).
Whilst the Court does not claim that cases which have been rejected should have been accepted, it notes that there are two cases where there is a lack of clarity in the criteria applied orin the justification presented to the Member State(see Textbox 3).