What is the translation of " USE OF THE MARK " in Slovenian?

• uporabo znamke
• uporabi znamke
• uporabe znamke

Examples of using Use of the mark in English and their translations into Slovenian

Regulations governing use of the mark.
Pravilnik o uporabi blagovne znamke.

The certifier controls use of the mark and has the exclusive right to prevent unauthorised use..
Potrjevalec nadzoruje uporabo znamke in ima izključno pravico do preprečevanja nepooblaščene uporabe..

Amendment of the regulations governing use of the mark.
Sprememba pravilnika o uporabi blagovne znamke.

Evidence of use of the mark at issue and the acquisition by that mark of distinctive character throughout the European Union.
Dokaz o uporabi zadevne znamke in njene pridobitve razlikovalnega učinka v celotni Uniji.

(iii) the furnishing of a declaration and/or evidence concerning use of the mark.
(iii) predložitev izjave in/ali dokaza v zvezi z uporabo znamke.

The certifier typically cannot make use of the mark itself, and use is open to anybody that meets the certification standards.
Potrjevalec praviloma ne sme uporabljati znamke, v vseh drugih primerih pa je uporaba na voljo vsakomur, ki izpolnjuje standarde potrjevanja.

(In this case, the arduous task of legally disputing the use of the mark needs to be undertaken.).
(V tem primeru se je treba odločiti za težavno nalogo pravnega izpodbijanja uporabe znamke.).

This includes monitoring the use of the marks in the marketplace, and directly contacting those organisations that are using them improperly or without authorisation.
To vključuje spremljanje uporabe oznak na trgu in neposredne stike s tistimi organizacijami, ki ime in logotip uporabljajo nepravilno ali neupravičeno.

This Regulation also sets out the conditions of use of the mark, including sanctions.
V tem pravilniku se navedejo tudi pogoji za uporabo znamke, vključno s sankcijami.

Even, therefore, if trade mark use of the mark is a relevant criterion, the proprietor should be entitled to prohibit the commercial activity at issue in the main proceedings.
Zato, čeprav bi uporaba znamke kot znamke bila pomembno merilo, bi moral imeti navedeni imetnik pravico, da prepove gospodarsko dejavnost v postopku o glavni stvari.

How the certifying body is to test those characteristics and supervise the use of the mark;
Način, na katerega bo certifikacijski organ preverjal navedene značilnosti in nadziral uporabo certifikacijske znamke EU.

Thus, it follows from the five market surveys referred to in paragraph 129 above, first, that they relate to the use of the mark at issue in its registered form and, secondly, that they measure the perception of that mark by the relevant public.
Tako iz petih tržnih raziskav, navedenih zgoraj v točki 129, izhaja, prvič, da se nanašajo na uporabo zadevne znamke v registrirani obliki, in drugič, da konkretno merijo dojemanje te znamke od upoštevne javnosti.

Therefore, it acts as weapon in the hand of registered proprietor or owner of the mark to prevent other traders from unlawful use of the mark of the registered owner.
Zato, da deluje kot orožje v roko registrirani imetnik ali lastnik znamke, da prepreči drugim subjektom iz nezakonite uporabe znamke registriranega lastnika.

Requested proof of genuine use of the mark on which the opposition is based although that mark is not a Community trade mark or an‘earlier national trade mark', but the German part of an internationally registered mark;
Je zahtevalo dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi znamke, navedene v postopku z ugovorom, čeprav ta znamka ni znamka Skupnosti niti„prejšnja nacionalna znamka“, temveč nemški del znamke, ki je bila predmet mednarodne registracije;

The rules shall specify the persons authorised to use the mark, the conditions of membership of the association and the conditions of use of the mark.
Pravilnik o uporabi določa vsaj osebe, pooblaščene za uporabo znamke, pogoje za pridobitev članstva v združenju in pogoje za uporabo znamke.

The applicant, supported by the intervening association, submits that, contrary to what the Board of Appeal found, the use of the mark at issue in the form where the colour scheme is reversed does not alter the distinctive character of that mark.
Tožeča stranka ob podpori združenja intervenienta meni, da uporaba zadevne znamke v obliki obratne kombinacije barv, v nasprotju s stališčem odbora za pritožbe, ne spreminja razlikovalnega učinka te znamke..

In particular, in paragraphs 39, 40 and 43 of the contested decision, the Board of Appeal reproduced the following examples of evidence, which, according to it, were not such as to show genuine use of the mark at issue.
Zlasti v točkah 39, 40 in 43 izpodbijane odločbe je odbor za pritožbe ponovil naslednje primere dokazov, s katerimi po njegovem mnenju ni mogoče dokazati uporabe zadevne znamke.

In essence, that the evidence of use showed use of the mark at issue for‘sports footwear' in Class 25 of the Nice Agreement, for the relevant period, which it defined as corresponding to the five years preceding the date of filing the counterclaim.
V bistvu je poudaril, da dokazi o uporabi izkazujejo uporabo zadevne znamke za„športne čevlje“ iz razreda 25 v smislu Nicejskega aranžmaja v upoštevnem obdobju, ki ga je opredelil kot pet let pred datumom vložitve nasprotne tožbe.

They submit that, in order to establish that a trade mark has acquired distinctive character, the trade mark proprietor can only rely on the use of the mark such as it was registered.
Po njunem mnenju bi se lahko imetnik znamke za ugotovitev, da je znamka pridobila razlikovalni učinek, skliceval samo na uporabo znamke, kot je bila registrirana.

The holder of the international registration shall submit the regulations governing the use of the mark, as provided for in Article 75 and 84, directly to the Office within two months of the date on which the International Bureau notifies the international registration to the Office.
Imetnik mednarodne registracije predloži pravilnik o uporabi znamke v skladu s členoma 75 in 84 neposredno Uradu v roku dveh mesecev od dneva, ko Mednarodni urad obvesti Urad o mednarodni registraciji.

The regulations governing use shall specify the persons authorized to use the mark, the conditions of membership of the association and, where they exist, the conditions of use of the mark including sanctions.
Pravilnik o uporabi določa vsaj osebe, pooblaščene za uporabo znamke, pogoje za pridobitev članstva v združenju in pogoje za uporabo znamke, vključno s sankcijami.

An amendment to the regulations governing use of the mark has been mentioned in the Register in breach of Article 74f(2), unless the proprietor of the mark, by further amending the regulations governing use, complies with the requirements of that Article.
(c) je bila sprememba pravilnika o uporabi blagovne znamke vpisana v register zaradi kršitve določb iz člena 71(2), razen če nosilec blagovne znamke z nadaljnjo spremembo pravilnika o uporabi uspe ugoditi zahtevam teh določb.

The proprietor of an EU certification mark shall be entitled to claim compensation on behalf of persons who have authority to use the mark where they have sustained damage as a consequence of unauthorised use of the mark.
Imetnik blagovne znamke ima pravico, da v imenu oseb, ki so pooblaščene za uporabo znamke, zahteva nadomestilo, kadar so navedene osebe utrpele škodo zaradi nepooblaščene uporabe znamke.

Furthermore, although the applicant relies, in order to prove the use of the mark at issue, on the fact that it sponsors both European and international sporting competitions, the applicant does not claim or show, in support of that argument in respect of its sponsorship activity, that the markets in different Member States are comparable.
Poleg tega, čeprav se tožeča stranka, da bi dokazala uporabo zadevne znamke, sklicuje na okoliščino, da sponzorira večja evropska in mednarodna športna tekmovanja, s pomočjo te trditve v zvezi z njeno dejavnostjo sponzorstva ne zatrjuje niti ne dokazuje, da so trgi različnih držav članic primerljivi.

The regulations governing use shall specify the persons authorised to use the mark, the characteristics to be certified by the mark, how the certifying body is to test those characteristics and to supervise the use of the mark.
V pravilniku o uporabi znamke se navedejo osebe, ki smejo uporabljati znamko, lastnosti, ki jih znamka certificira, način, na katerega bo certifikacijski organ preverjal navedene lastnosti in nadziral uporabo znamke.

That error arises, on the one hand, from the fact that the Court envisaged use of the mark only through its incorporation into a packet of cigarettes, although the shape of packaging for a given product can be perceived by the public in a multitude of other forms, such as graphic or three-dimensional representations of the mark in advertising material.
Ta napaka naj bi na eni strani izhajala iz dejstva, da naj bi Sodišče prve stopnje upoštevalo rabo znamke le na podlagi njene namestitve na zavitek cigaret, medtem ko lahko oblika embalaže določenega proizvoda vpliva na zaznavanje javnosti s številnimi drugimi izraznimi sredstvi, kot so grafične ali tridimenzionalne predstavitve znamke v promocijskih materialih.

(b) The applicant may file, instead of or in addition to the declaration of intention to use the mark referred to in subparagraph(a)(xvii), a declaration of actual use of the mark and evidence to that effect, as required by the law of the Contracting Party.
(b) Prijavitelj lahko namesto izjave o namenu za uporabo znamke iz točke(xvii) pododstavka(a) ali dodatno k njej vloži izjavo o dejanski uporabi znamke in dokaze o tem, kot zahteva zakonodaja pogodbenice.

It should be noted, first, that the applicant produced almost 12 000 pages of evidence before EUIPO and, secondly, that both the Cancellation Division and the Board of Appeal criticised the applicant for failing to produce evidence of use of the mark at issue itself.
Opozoriti pa je treba, prvič, da je tožeča stranka predložila 12.000 strani dokazov pred EUIPO, in drugič, da sta ji oddelek za izbris in odbor za pritožbe očitala, da ni predložila dokaza o uporabi zadevne znamke.

Nevertheless, it must be stated that the applicant has not identified, before the General Court, from the images produced during the proceedings before EUIPO, those which would establish use of the mark in its registered form or in forms that are broadly equivalent.
Vendar je treba ugotoviti, da tožeča stranka pred Splošnim sodiščem med slikami, predloženimi v postopku pred EUIPO, ni opredelila tistih, na podlagi katerih je mogoče ugotoviti uporabo prijavljene znamke v njeni registrirani obliki ali v na splošno enakovrednih oblikah.