Examples of using Average cut in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Average cuts.
This pad has very good life with average cut resistance.
Four column of hydraulic cylinder, average cutting force.
A Option of average cut of 24 per cent for SVEs.
Within the 12% tariff lines, 5% can have zero cut, butthe 12% as a whole will have an average cut overall of 11.
In any case, the overall average cut should be 10- 14 per cent.
The minimum average cut on final bound tariffs that a developed country Member shall be required to undertake8 is 54 per cent.
Between 2009 and 2010, the average cuts in Europe was 0.5%.
Some 30 developing countries would apply the tiered formula, while the 48 small andvulnerable economies would apply a more lenient formula cut or an overall average cut.
The overall maximum average cut is set at 36%, which is much higher than the Uruguay Round average cut of 24.
The EU signalled after the Hong Kong meeting that it was prepared to move from its earlier offer of average cuts of 39 per cent closer to the developing country group proposal(G20) of 54 per cent.
An average cut of 36 per cent has been proposed by the G-20, together with flexibility for sensitive and special products in order to limit potential negative impacts on small and vulnerable farmers.
For instance, under the G20 formula, ACP countries would undertakeaverage cuts of 33 per cent, as compared to average cut of 28 per cent by non-ACP DCs.
A different approach of an average cut by 24 per cent was suggested for small and vulnerable economies, as well as African countries that had bound their tariffs at high uniform levels in the Uruguay Round.
A coalition of some 100 developing countries thus called forgreater product coverage and a lesser minimum average cut to shield a greater number of products from fuller market opening.
The G33 rejected a one-tier system because the tariffs with zero cut within that would mean that other tariffs have to"compensate" by being higher than otherwise to meet the average cut.
Alternatively, they may chose not to apply the tiered formula butsimply meet an overall average cut of 24 per cent through having in effect opted to designate as many tariff lines as they choose as Special Products.
On cotton, on which the African countries inparticular place great importance, the Chair's text retains its previous proposal of a more significant cut in domestic support than the average cut.
DCs applying the formula would make higher average cuts in bound tariffs than developed countries, even though they would maintain applied tariffs higher than developed countries after the formula cuts. .
Since the line-by-line reduction does not guarantee a priori the significant level of overall average reduction,the target minimum average cut for developed countries was set at 54 per cent.
For developing countries, the maximum average cut was set at 36 per cent so that the tiered formula does not lead to disproportionately deep cuts, as developing countries tend to maintain high initial bound tariffs that are subject to larger cuts. .
This does not entirely cover all the subtleties of those proposals to utilize a“pivot”(although most are in fact within the ranges tabulated), butis intended to convey a snapshot of the status of average cuts proposed post-August.
For the 48 small and vulnerable economies(SVEs), the required average cut in bound rates is 24 per cent with no minimumcut. This is significant, as many SVEs would otherwise undertake higher average cuts due to their high initial tariff levels.
By way of example, and according to the analysis by the Tax Policy Center,while the median citizen would enjoy an average tax cut of 1.8%, those citizens with incomes in the top quintile(the 20% top earners of the population) would enjoy an average cut of 6.6.
In particular, the issue arose as developing countries applying the formula would make higher average cuts in bound tariffs than developed countries, even though they would maintain bound tariffs that would be higher than those of developed countries after the cuts. .
For expanded Sensitive tariff quotas a single rate of duty,equal to the lowest current bound in-quota tariff applicable to the tariff lines 18 Reductions in in-quota tariffs shall not count for the purposes of calculating the average cuts.
The deeper tariff cuts in tropical products reduce the final average tariff only marginally to 11 per cent, butare sufficient to raise the average cut, as opposed to the average tariff, well above the required 54 per cent.
Furthermore the level of the average cut should respect developmental levels and needs of countries, be based on the principle of special and differential treatment and commensurate with the level of ambition of a deal on agriculture and to be decided after delivering on the developmental mandate of the round.
Due to the binding overhang in developing countries, some Members complained that applied rates in some developing countries were only be marginally reduced under the G20 proposal,where developing countries would make average cuts of 36 per cent at most in connection with the agreed flexibilities.