Examples of using Budapest process in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Budapest Process currently has three regional working groups.
Development-relevant issues also do not appear in the broad agenda of the Budapest Process.
In the context of the Budapest process, ICMPD has organized 70 intergovernmental meetings since 1995.
For instance, the first meeting of what would become the Budapest Process was convened by Germany in 1991.
For example, the RCM, Budapest Process and the APC consulted the IGC on setting up a Secretariat and on data collection methodologies.
The conference was held within the synergy created by Turkey as the chairman of the Budapest Process and the chairman-in-office of the BSEC.
In 1997, the Ministerial Conference of the Budapest Process adopted a set of recommendations in Prague, many of which addressed the emerging problem of trafficking.
The activities of an international working group focusing on asylum andmigration in the scope of the Budapest Process, including most European States.
The Budapest Process is an informal intergovernmental forum for cooperation and dialogue, including the governments of 40 countries and 10 international institutions.
In this regard,Ministers supported the efforts of the APC, IGC and Budapest Process to facilitate inter-regional dialogue.
The Budapest Process, which started in 1993, aims at reinforcing cooperation regarding the control of migration among countries of Central, Eastern and Western Europe.
However, as the European Union gradually took over that role, the Budapest Process shifted its focus towards Eastern Europe and has recently redirected its activities towards the CIS region.
The International Centre for Migration Policy Development(ICMPD), an intergovernmental organization created in 1993 at the initiative of the Governments of Austria andSwitzerland, serves as the secretariat of the Budapest Process.
The Bali Process and the Budapest Process, for instance, organised joint workshops in 2004 and 2005 on return of migrants to their home countries and counter-trafficking, respectively.
In pursuance of the recommendations ofthe Rhodes Ministerial Conference, ICMPD in 2004 launched a project on the redirection of the Budapest Process towards the CIS region, which was co-financed by the European Commission.
The intergovernmental forum known as the Budapest Process was established in the early 1990s with the aim of combating irregular migration and establishing sustainable systems for orderly migration in the wider European region.
To give you a concrete example of a well-functioning regional dialogue on migration,I would like to mention the Budapest Process, which is a consultative forum of more than 50 participating States and 10 international organizations.
The Budapest Process has developed over phases; the first phase(1993-2003) focused on cooperation with the Central and Eastern European countries, at that time outside the EU framework, as well as with the countries of South-East Europe.
Participants agreed to place the issue of human trafficking high on the agenda of the Budapest Process, an intergovernmental forum on migration in the wider European region, which is currently chaired by Turkey.
Main areas of discussion Current priorities The Budapest Process is an intergovernmental dialogue engaging close to 50 Governments and more than 10 international organisations, in developing comprehensive and sustainable systems for orderly migration.
Both UNHCR and IOM were represented at the thirteenth meeting of the Budapest Group of Senior Officials,convened in conjunction with consultations on the redirection of the Budapest Process towards the CIS region and held in Vienna on 29 and 30 June 2005.
These include the Puebla Process in North andCentral America, the Budapest Process in Europe, the Manila Process and the Bangkok Declaration in Asia and the Migration Dialogue for Southern Africa(MISDA) Process. .
Originally focusing on“control-oriented” themes such as return, readmission, border management and asylum, the Budapest Process has recently paid greater attention to issues such as admission, labour migration, integration and reintegration.
Representatives from the Bali Process, Budapest Process, Migration Dialogue for Southern Africa and South American Conference on Migration further highlighted key features of their dialogue and cooperation processes and specific actions undertaken since the previous global meeting.
As a result, both the Issyk-Kul Dialogue, which focuses largely on the countries of the South Caucasus and Central Asia and their neighbours butwhich since January 2004 has been suspended, and the Budapest Process, which since 2003 has redirected its activities to the CIS region, have acknowledged the utility of closer cooperation with the 1996 Geneva Conference process and the related subregional Söderköping Process. .
Other examples include the Bali Process, the Budapest Process, the Colombo Process, the Puebla Process, the Migration Dialogues for Southern and West Africa and the Southern American Conference on Migration, which aim to foster greater coordination on migration issues.
Croatia was part of regional initiatives for the protection of the rights of migrants, including the Budapest Process, the Adriatic-Ionian Initiative, the Central European Initiative, the Regional Task Force and the Stability Pact for Southeastern Europe.
In January 2006,Turkey assumed the Presidency of the Budapest Process, which is an intergovernmental unofficial cooperation and dialogue forum involving 50 governmental and 10 international organizations that aims to prevent irregular migration and to establish sustainable mechanisms in the field of migration management.
It reported on its initiative to provide forums in which States could discuss policies and facilitate regional coordination and cooperation,including the Budapest Process, which was a consultative forum of more than 40 Governments and 10 international organizations that addressed irregular migration and sustainable systems for orderly migration in the wider European region.
Completed questionnaires were received from the first five of these RCPs, the Budapest Process, MTM, SACM and APC; responsive materials(but not questionnaires) were received from RCM and MIDWA; and no response was received from the 5+5 Dialogue.