Examples of using Morphological differences in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
There are constant morphological differences between the two species.
These species could be synonymous(in which case only I. stensioei would remain), because their morphological differences are not very pronounced.
Slight morphological differences have been observed between subspecies.
The soleus exhibits significant morphological differences across species.
These morphological differences are used to identify adult specimens.
Acraeus has been mistaken for R. piliferus but minute morphological differences distinguish each plant as its own species.
Morphological differences and similarities between these genotypes were identified.
And that also appears, with few morphological differences, in the Celtic, Etruscan and Roman cultures.
This paper examined the genetic relationships between the two species and two morphs andconcluded that while there are clear morphological differences between.
The major morphological differences between fecal cysts of B.
A drastic increase in number of recognized species occurred in 2007,when a review advocated that more than 50 local European populations should be considered as distinct based on morphological differences.
This model shows the morphological differences of the incisor, canine and molar teeth.
Then in 1887, William Colenso described what he thought was a new species, Oreostylidium affine,based on specific morphological differences from previous descriptions of O. subulatum.
However, there are morphological differences involving chromosome 14, the last autosome pair.
Argument regarding whether or not N. schikhobalowi and N. salmincola were the same or different species recurred until 1966 when the two were granted subspecific status in order to reflect their biological andgeographic differences, but little significant morphological differences.
We found clear morphological differences that support the recognition of two different species.
Therefore, Tschopp et al. argued that Apatosaurus excelsus, originally classified as Brontosaurus excelsus,had enough morphological differences from other species of Apatosaurus that it warranted being reclassified as a separate genus again.
However, morphological differences can be due to environmental conditions rather than taxonomic distinctiveness.
It was distinguished from all other sauropods by vertebral details, andhas various morphological differences in other bones compared to other sauropods of the Early Cretaceous of North America.
Some minor morphological differences have been claimed between the two descriptions(leading to the maintenance of both as separate taxa by a few botanists), but this is not supported by modern studies of the species, which show that both names refer to the same taxon.
It is difficult to differentiate between juveniles of Aphonopelma and Brachypelma as the morphological differences between species are not well-developed in young specimens often referred to as“spiderlings”.
There are a number of morphological differences; G. maritimus mushrooms are larger and thicker, there are never remains of the partial veil on G. fulgens stems, the shape of the top of the spores differs between the two species, and the cheilocystidia and caulocystidia are significantly larger on G. maritimus.
High-power spotting scopes today allow observers to detect minute morphological differences that were earlier possible only by examination of the specimen"in the hand.
Although there are morphological differences between the species, they tend to be slight and somewhat inconsistent.
Several specimens of various world populations have been studied, andthere have been found no significant morphological differences between samples from the different countries but the size and number of spots on the mantle Jung et al., 2013.
In 1886 Golgi described the morphological differences that are still used to distinguish two malaria parasite species Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium malariae.
This finding was supported by several morphological differences including the presence of rhizomorphs and its preference for wood.
This morphological difference is reflected in the typological treatment of clusters.
The external morphological difference is sufficiently pronounced to be evident in animals observed at sea in the wild Wang et al. 2010.
However, in 1925 Swedish researcher Carl Wiman, studying specimen UUPM R157,concluded that a fundamental morphological difference could distinguish the two species: C. zitteli has a proportionally much longer wing.