Examples of using Is to read in English and their translations into Swedish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Political
My job is to read men.
With the eyes of critical judgment. My responsibility is to read it.
One tip is to read on unnaryd.
The inscription is to read.
My job is to read men. My problem?
People also translate
You know, what I like is to read think.
The goal is to read 100 or more books.
An explanation of what is meant by the right of use is to read in the policy.
A good start is to read about the basics.
He reckons the best way to improve your style is to read.
My job is to read the news, not absorb it.
At the same time one of the most important points is to read the correct useful books.
My responsibility is to read it with the eyes of critical judgment.
He reckons the best way to improve your style is to read.
What a joy it is to read a real philosopher!
One actually great way to find a reliable site is to read on-line forums.
The first step is to read people's comments.
Well, one of the best ways to differentiate the best option is to read some reviews.
The best solution is to read it where it was created.
Maybe it just bounced a signal off a satellite to an attack sub in the gulf of mexico whose mission is to read our brain waves.
My job is to read people, to understand their motives.
The secret of learning is to read what speaks to you.
Your job is to read five manuscripts a week, But like I said during the interview, and if you like them.
The key to learning is to read what speaks to you.
But like I said during the interview, and if you like them, just forward them on to me. your job is to read five manuscripts a week.
One way to do that is to read your work aloud
An interesting account of the legend of the mummy on the Titanic is to read in the magazine STENCIL Arcanum, Feb.
Its purpose is to read or write XML documents by using HTTP GET operations, POST operations, or both.
the company he founded is to read in its entirety in our digital museum.
What is even worse is to read in the Financial Times today a justification of this action from Robert Zoellick,