Примеры использования Access to administrative or judicial на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Criteria for ensuring access to administrative or judicial procedures.
Access to administrative or judicial proceedings and effective remedies art. 9, paras. 3 and 4.
The Party concerned also recalls that article 9,paragraph 3, provides for access to administrative"or" judicial procedures.
Thus, in the view of the communicant,by not ensuring that WWF-UK has access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge acts and omissions by public authorities, the Party concerned failed to comply with article 9, paragraph 3, of the Convention.
Stresses that, according to article 9, paragraph 3, it is for each Party to determine the criteria, if any,which must be met by members of the public in order to have access to administrative or judicial procedures within the scope of that paragraph;
Everyone should have access to administrative or judicial procedures for the making of complaints about actsor omissions committed by persons or public or private organizations in contravention of the right to water and sanitation.
Support was expressed for the inclusion of a provision ensuring access to administrative or judicial procedures and timely issuance of relevant decisions.
This Article article stipulates that, when acts or omissions of the public authorities contravene provisions of the national law relating to the environment,members of the public must have access to administrative or judicial processprocedures.
Thus, Belgium is obliged to ensure that in these cases members of the public have access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge the acts concerned, as set out in article 9, paragraph 3.
Thus, without ruling out that other acts and omissions by EU institutions may also be covered by article 9, paragraphs 2 or 3, of the Convention, the Committee is convinced that for at least some acts andomissions by EU institutions, the Party concerned must ensure that members of the public have access to administrative or judicial review procedures, as set out in article 9, paragraph 3.
The communicants alleged that their rights under article 9,paragraph 3, to have access to administrative or judicial procedures were violated when a court repeatedly rejected consideration of the part of a lawsuit related to the alleged failure by the public authorities to act.
The only provision that might have been of somerelevance was article 9, paragraph 3, but the Committee considered that the communication did not relate to a denial of access to administrative or judicial procedures but rather reflected dissatisfaction with their outcome.
According to the national law,members of the public have access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge acts and omissions by private persons and public authorities which contravene the provisions of national law relating to the environment.
In the context of adequate and effective remedies, civil society and members of the public had been increasingly enjoying better access to administrative or judicial procedures, and law and jurisprudence were evolving in that respect.
The communicants claim that their right of access to administrative or judicial review procedures guaranteed under article 9, paragraph 3, of the Convention were violated when a court repeatedly failed to consider a part of a lawsuit related to the failure to act by the public authorities.
For all these acts and omissions, each Party must ensure that members of the public"where they meet the criteria, if any,laid down in its national law" have access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge the acts and omissions concerned.
It is recommended that members of the public should have access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge acts and omissions by private persons and public authorities which contravene provisions of national law relating to the environment, including laws on GMOs.
Thus, Denmark is obliged to ensure that, in cases where administrative agencies fail to act in accordance with national law relating to nature conservation,members of the public have access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge such acts and omissions.
Members of the public are provided with access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge acts of private persons and omissions of authorities which contravene provisions of national law relating to noise and urban and land-planning environmental standards.
Communication ACCC/C/2011/58 was made on 9 February 2011 by the NGO Balkani Wildlife Society with regard to compliance by Bulgaria with article 9, paragraphs 2 and 3,of the Convention in connection with access to administrative or judicial review procedures for environmental NGOs and members of the public to challenge acts that contravene national environmental legislation.
Members of the public should also have access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge actsor omissions by private persons or public authorities when they consider that such acts or omissions amount to criminal acts or administrative offences.
Article 9, paragraph 3, of the Convention requires each Party to ensure that, where they meet the criteria, if any, laid down in its national law,members of the public have access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge acts and omissions by private persons and public authorities which contravene provisions of its national law relating to the environment.
This paragraph obliges Parties to provide access to administrative or judicial proceedings to members of the public meeting the criteria laid down in national law in order to challenge"acts and omissions by private persons and public authorities which contravene provisions of national law relating to the environment.
In addition and without prejudice to the review procedures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, each Party shall ensure that, where they meet the criteria, if any, laid down in its national law,members of the public have access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge acts and omissions by private persons and public authorities which contravene provisions of its national law relating to the environment.
Members of the public have access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge acts and omissions by private persons and public authorities which contravene provisions of the national law relating to the environment; this is provided by the Constitution of the Republic of Bulgaria, according to which everyone has a right to a healthy environment.
If the legislation of the Party of origin includes the possibility for the public or authorities of the affected Party to have access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge final decisions on a proposed activity, the final decision shall include information about this possibility.
Facilitate access to administrative or judicial procedures of States that are in accordance with their international obligations and that allow for the prosecution of perpetrators of crimes committed against children, and in which decisions on whether a child should be separated from her or his abusive or negligent parents or caretakers are made based on a determination of the child's best interests;
If the legislation of the Party of origin includes the possibilityfor the public or authorities of the affected Party to have access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge final decisions on a proposed activity, the final decision shall include information about this possibility.
In addition, the communicant alleges that the Party concerned has failed to ensure access to administrative or judicial procedures that are not prohibitively expensive in accordance with article 9, paragraph 4, of the Convention in relation to the communicant's application for judicial review of the June 2003 determination and one of the recommendations of the EiP panel.
It is recommended that the public authorities at national and supranational levels should ensure that any member of the public or public-interest organization who considers that in the decision by the public authorities due account was not taken of the outcome of the public participation procedure has access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge the decision before a court of lawor another independent and impartial body established by law.