Примеры использования Agreement on normalization на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Agreement on Normalization of Relations between the Federal.
The Yugoslav and Croatian Governments have provided texts deriving from their bilateral Agreement on Normalization.
Agreement on Normalization of Relations between the Republic.
In July last year, Israel andTurkey signed an agreement on normalization of relations with the specific requirements of both sides.
Agreement on Normalization of Relations and the territorial dispute over Prevlaka.
Люди также переводят
The question of a broad amnesty,it should be noted, was addressed in the Agreement on Normalization of Relations of 23 August 1996.
The Agreement on Normalization between the Republic of Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia signed on 23 August 1996 provides for a peaceful resolution of disputes and a commitment to refrain from threats or the use of force.
The basis of our negotiations is contained in article 4 of the Agreement on Normalization of Relations, signed in Belgrade on 23 August 1996.
When extending the mandate, the Council also called upon Croatia andthe Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to implement fully their agreement on normalization of relations.
The original framework for bilateral negotiations was subsequently strengthened by the Agreement on Normalization of Relations between Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia S/1996/744.
The Croatian side is delaying the continuation of work of the Commissions of the two sides for the resolution of the question of Prevlaka as provided for under the Agreement on Normalization of Relations.
The Special Rapporteur welcomes the April 1998 bilateral protocol to the Agreement on Normalization between Croatia and the FRY, which begins to address the complexities of refugee return.
However, both parties have continued to reiterate their firm commitment to a negotiated resolution of the disputed issue of Prevlaka, in accordance with the Agreement on Normalization of Relations.
These concerns have been formally recognized by my Government in the Agreement on Normalization of Relations between the Republic of Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia A/51/351-S/1996/744, annex.
The opening of a crossing point at Debeli Brijeg was not based on a bilateral agreement between Croatia andthe Federal Republic of Yugoslavia as foreseen in the Agreement on Normalization of Relations of 23 August 1996.
Urges the parties to abide by their mutual commitments andto implement fully the Agreement on Normalization of Relations between the Republic of Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia of 23 August 1996;
The Agreement on Normalization of Relations between the Republic of Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, signed on 23 August 1996, fulfils an essential precondition for the achievement of a peaceful settlement of the Prevlaka issue.
The Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs expresses its concern over the continued violations, delays and avoidance to carry out further already scheduled and agreed activities andsteps in the implementation of the Agreement on Normalization of Relations.
The presidency of the Socialist Party of Serbia unanimously supported the initialed draft agreement on normalization or relaxation of relations between Belgrade and Pristina.
The Agreement on Normalization of Relations between the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Republic of Croatia represents a new challenge and a new possibility to have the territorial dispute over Prevlaka resolved by negotiations between the two parties.
A further step towards the concrete establishment of long-term peace in the region was made under the Agreement on Normalization of Relations between the Republic of Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia dated 23 August 1996.
The Agreement on Normalization of Relations between the Republic of Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, signed at Belgrade in August 1996, committed the Parties(in article 7) to ensuring to returning refugees and displaced persons"the return of their property or a just compensation.
However, the two Governments hold different interpretations about what the Agreement on Normalization defines as a"disputed issue", in addition to their different understandings of the security regime established by the United Nations.
Pursuant to the commitment contained in the Joint Declaration,the Republic of Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia included the security issue of Prevlaka in their Agreement on Normalization of Relations A/51/351-S/1996/744, annex.
Urges the parties to abide by their mutual commitments andto implement fully the Agreement on Normalization of Relations between the Republic of Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and stresses that these are critical for the establishment of peace and security throughout the region;
Both the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia andCroatia have indicated a willingness to resolve their dispute over Prevlaka through bilateral negotiations, pursuant to the Agreement on Normalization of Relations signed by them at Belgrade on 23 August 1996 S/1996/706, annex.
The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has lead a constructive policy towards Croatia in accordance with the Agreement on Normalization of Relations between the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Republic of Croatia of 1996(A/51/318-S/1996/706, annex), in the implementation of which some significant results have been achieved.
The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Croatia have both repeatedly affirmed a willingness to resolve their dispute over Prevlaka through bilateral negotiations, pursuant to the Agreement on Normalization of Relations signed by them at Belgrade on 23 August 1996 S/1996/706, annex.
As members of the Security Council will recall,both the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Croatia have undertaken, in their Agreement on Normalization of Relations signed at Belgrade on 23 August 1996(S/1996/706, annex), to resolve their dispute over Prevlaka through bilateral negotiations.