Примеры использования Annexation of east jerusalem на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The annexation of East Jerusalem is illegal;
Unfortunately, Israel's illegal attempt at annexation of East Jerusalem has obscured this truth.
Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem and the Syrian Golan must stop.
The Security Council, in its resolution 476(1980),condemned Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem.
The de facto annexation of East Jerusalem 15- 16 9.
No member of the United Nations, apart from Israel,recognizes the annexation of East Jerusalem.
Jordan's annexation of East Jerusalem has never been recognised by the international community.
We judge that this is a deliberate Israeli policy the completion of the annexation of East Jerusalem.
Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem constitutes a flagrant violation of international law.
That was not the opinion of the international community,which would never accept the annexation of East Jerusalem.
Seeks to make the annexation of East Jerusalem irreversible, which is a violation of Security Council resolution 478(1980), which declared such an annexation null and void.
He noted, in particular,the building of settlements, the annexation of East Jerusalem and recent events in the region.
The annexation of East Jerusalem in 1967 and the Israeli law naming Jerusalem as the State capital were rejected by the Security Council, which declared those measures null and void.
It is along the same line of previous attempts,such as Jewish settlement activities and unlawful annexation of East Jerusalem.
The Committee had reminded Israel that its settlement activities, the annexation of East Jerusalem, any actions to strengthen its hold on the city and the construction of the wall on occupied land were contrary to international law.
What we see as illegal, and as obstacles to peace,is unilateral action in building illegal settlements, the construction of an illegal wall and the annexation of East Jerusalem.
The Committee reminded Israel, the occupying Power,that its settlement activities, the annexation of East Jerusalem, any actions to strengthen its hold on the city and the construction of the wall on occupied land were contrary to international law.
Viewing East Jerusalem Palestinian residents as foreigners who entered Israel is perplexing,since it was Israel that entered East Jerusalem in 1967, since the annexation of East Jerusalem.
The Committee reminded Israel, the occupying Power,that its settlement activities, the annexation of East Jerusalem, any actions to strengthen its hold on the city and the construction of the wall on occupied land were contrary to international law.
This support further illustrates the institutional and systematic discrimination against the Palestinian residents of Jerusalem by Israel,as well as ongoing Israeli efforts to create what are euphemistically called"facts on the ground" for the annexation of East Jerusalem.
The Wall and the Qalandiya checkpoint combined are the denouement of Israel's incessant efforts aimed at the illegal,de facto annexation of East Jerusalem and its total separation and isolation from the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
In fact, Israel, in defiance of those principles and the provisions of Security Council resolution 242(1967), has persisted for 43 years in its occupation through its armed aggression against the Arab, Palestinian andSyrian territories and its annexation of East Jerusalem and the Golan.
We condemn that unlawful campaign andall related measures and reaffirm our rejection of Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem, a measure that has not been recognized by the international community and has been determined by the Security Council and the General Assembly to be null and void.
The Special Rapporteur submits that the time has come to condemn the Wall as an act of unlawful annexation in the language of Security Council resolutions 478(1980) and 497(1981)which declare that Israel's actions aimed at the annexation of East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights are"null and void" and should not be recognized by States.
The recent attempt by the Government of Israel to entrench its unlawful annexation of East Jerusalem by reinstating the Absentee Property Act, while a failure, had been a stark reflection of Israel's colonial intentions and bad faith, which were absolutely contrary to the conditions for a resumption of the peace process.
That position was set out most clearly in Security Council resolution 446(1979), in which Israel is called on not to transfer its population into the occupied Arab territories; resolution 452(1979),in which the Council stated that the annexation of East Jerusalem to Israel was unlawful; and 465(1980), in which the Council stated that settlements should be dismantled.
Israeli policies, which the facts on the ground have shown to be aimed at the annexation of East Jerusalem, include home demolitions, the revocation of residency permits, undermining constructions by and confiscating the land of Palestinians, have resulted in the expropriation of 23,378 dunams of land in occupied East Jerusalem since 1968.
In contrast to the Arab States' commitment to the Madrid principles, to Security Council resolutions and to the land-for-peace formula, the statements made by the Israeli Government indicate an insistence on consolidating of its occupation of Arab lands;maintaining its annexation of East Jerusalem; and delaying the agreed-upon redeployment of its troops from Al-Khalil.
Japan cannot condone such a unilateral change to the legal status of an occupied territory by Israel, following the annexation of East Jerusalem in July 1980, which is in total violation of international law and United Nations Security Council resolutions 242(1967) and 338 1973.
The annexation of East Jerusalem also contravenes the obligations of the occupying State under the provisions and principles of international human rights instruments, international humanitarian law and the peremptory norms of international law, including the principle of the rights of peoples to self-determination and permanent sovereignty over their natural wealth and resources.