Примеры использования Assessments could на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The assessments could be conducted on global, regional and national scales.
Underlying work to facilitate interpretation andunderstanding of suggested Topical Assessments could include.
Such assessments could differ substantially from those in developed regions.
As in the case of indicator S-4, international and national assessments could be made on the basis of NDVI statistics.
Similar assessments could be carried out in other countries should funding be available.
Another issue is that the estimation of the non- observed economy,which according to some independent assessments could amount for 30% of the GDP, is still not solved.
Thematic assessments could be carried out on a demand-driven, ad hoc basis, as decided by the plenary.
Global assessments are important but the linkage between"knowledge" and"action" might be easier to establish at the regional level,where regional assessments could play a significant role.
These assessments could be part of broader assessments on industrial and investment policies.
While there are no comprehensive global data sets,regional and national assessments could provide proxies while more coherent data sets or observation systems are being developed.
These assessments could be broadened to address concerns relating to the coordinated implementation of the Rio Conventions.
The scarcity of internal assessments used in the report was noted andit was suggested that, while external assessments could be used as background information, it was not appropriate to include these in the report.
Such assessments could provide the basis for sound policy development, as well as benchmarks for the evaluation of progress.
The Meeting was of the opinion that the future focus of the Commission should be on how those assessments could strengthen the work of the United Nations in general, in line with the overall priorities established by the Economic and Social Council and the General Assembly.
The assessments could be extended to include the work of the international financial organizations that provide funding for these projects.
In addition, the financial period for peacekeeping ran from 1 July to 30 June rather than from 1 January to 31 December;assessments were issued separately for each operation; and, since assessments could only be issued through the mandate period approved by the Security Council for each mission, they were issued for different periods throughout the year.
Such assessments could be used by CCAMLR to direct future conservation efforts at the by-catch species that are most at risk from fishing.
It agreed on a strategy for examining existing assessments to identify coverage and gaps in data, information and assessments, both thematic and geographic, to examine the capacity to undertake marine assessments and the processes used, andto consider how existing assessments could contribute to the regular process.
These sectoral assessments could provide guidance to national policymakers on ways to improve the performance of the tourism sector.
It was difficult to predict financial outcomes for peacekeeping activities: demand was unpredictable; the financial period for peacekeeping ran from 1 July to 30 June rather than from 1 January to 31 December;assessments were issued separately for each operation; and, since assessments could only be issued through the mandate period approved by the Security Council for each mission, they were issued for different periods throughout the year.
National assessments could determine what institutional arrangements would be most appropriate for the efficient allocation of resources.
A number of factors made it difficult to predict financial outcomes for peacekeeping activities: demand was unpredictable; the financial period for peacekeeping ran from 1 July to 30 June rather than from 1 January to 31 December;assessments were issued separately for each operation; and, since assessments could only be issued for the mandate period approved by the Security Council for each mission, they were issued for different periods throughout the year.
Subsequent assessments could then be based on a simpler form of report containing only relevant variations from the major report.
A number of factors made it difficult to predict financial outcomes for peacekeeping activities: demand was unpredictable; the financial period for peacekeeping ran from 1 July to 30 June rather than from 1 January to 31 December;assessments were issued separately for each operation; and, since assessments could only be issued through the mandate period approved by the Security Council for each mission, they were issued for different periods throughout the year.
Such assessments could lead, where appropriate, to assistance rendered to help the troop-contributing countries to meet the requisite standards.
A number of factors made it difficult to predict financial outcomes for peacekeeping activities with any confidence: demand was unpredictable; the financial period for peacekeeping ran from 1 July to 30 June rather than from 1 January to 31 December;assessments were issued separately for each operation; and, since assessments could only be issued for the mandate period approved by the Security Council for each mission, they were issued for different periods throughout the year.
Assessments could be undertaken to develop a better understanding of the scope and nature of the problem, as well as its root causes and contributing factors.
Considering the frequent changes of IP staff these assessments could be valid for a limited period or be renewed for a respective IP depending on the circumstances.
Assessments could be more meaningful in some instances if they could be compiled for agro-ecological zones, ecoregions, river basins, and geographical entities such as coastal areas and mountain regions.
It was difficult to predict financial outcomes for peacekeeping activities for a number of reasons. They included the fact that demand was unpredictable; that the financial period for peacekeeping ran from 1 July to 30 June rather than from 1 January to 31 December;that assessments were issued separately for each operation; and that, since assessments could only be issued through the mandate period approved by the Security Council for each mission, they were issued for different periods throughout the year.