Примеры использования Author affirms на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author affirms that the parcel was opened in the Netherlands.
With reference to article 463 of the Uzbek Criminal Procedure Code(see footnote 3 above), the author affirms that neither the trial nor the appeal court dispelled the outstanding doubts in his son's case.
The author affirms that her son's punishment was particularly severe.
As to the preparation of his defence, the author affirms that he has never received a single document pertaining to his case.
The author affirms that proceedings before the Presidium are conducted behind closed doors, without the right of representation.
Finally, and without further substantiating the claim, the author affirms that her son is also a victim of violations of his rights under articles 15 and 16 of the Covenant.
The author affirms that the court in fact"copied" the Prosecution's claim in its decision, and ignored all other evidence.
As to the requirement of exhaustion of domestic remedies, the author affirms, without giving details, that as an opponent to the government, it is not possible for him to lodge a complaint against the State party's authorities.
The author affirms that, on 8 August 1994, he was released on parole in Canada.
Also, in a submission to the court of Toledo, of 14 January 1994, the author affirms:"The crime for which he is being sentenced is an isolated incident in his life, and at all times he has shown a fervent and sincere desire to be reintegrated into society.
The author affirms that the investigators had also"fabricated" charges against her father and her brother.
In substantiation, the author affirms that her son was beaten at the early stages of the investigation, by several officials.
The author affirms that, as a result of the beatings, his son wrote down what the officers dictated to him.
Concerning article 27, the author affirms that the Russian linguistic minority has existed in Latvia for centuries, and represents some 37.5 per cent of the population.
The author affirms that the quality of his work had been confirmed by three professorial reviewers.
With regard to article 17 of the Covenant, the author affirms that the application of Act No. 2004-228 in his case constituted a breach of his right to respect for his privacy, honour and reputation, including respect for his identity as a member of the Sikh community.
The author affirms that this merely resulted in his losing what he refers to as"lawful road rights.
Finally, the author affirms that he was once more apprehended on 20 July 1992 and detained for several hours.
The author affirms that no relatives could see his son during the initial two months after arrest.
The author affirms that the matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation.
The author affirms that during the course of the trial he again met with his attorney, but that she did not carry out his instructions.
First, the author affirms that the State party's reply tends to present the case against her family as a purely economic one.
The author affirms that sections 122 and 123 of the Tasmanian Criminal Code violate articles 2, paragraph 1; 17; and 26 of the Covenant because.
The author affirms that this jurisprudence can only be relied on in case of confession of the accused, and that he never confessed.
The author affirms that during the trial, her husband's and his brother's lawyers both complained about the limited access to their clients.
The author affirms that his allegations under articles 17 and 23 should also be examined in the light of other provisions, especially articles 9 and 12.
The author affirms that according to a judgement of the Supreme Court of Uzbekistan of 1996, evidence obtained through unlawful methods is inadmissible.
The author affirms that Sudeten Germans are being humiliated as their State does not fulfil its duty to provide them with the same protection as other citizens.
The author affirms that the decision to detain him was unlawful, as the investigators had absolutely no evidence that he wanted to escape or to obstruct the inquiries.
Regarding article 17, the author affirms that that the right to retain his given and family name, including its graphical representation in writing, is an essential element of his identity.