Примеры использования Authors contend на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The authors contend that the State party has violated article 18 of the Covenant.
Regarding the exhaustion of domestic remedies, the authors contend that they approached all the relevant authorities.
The authors contend that no further domestic remedies are available to them.
It would be difficult to understand that reindeer owners would carry out logging if its consequences for reindeer herding andfor Sami culture were as harmful as the authors contend.
The authors contend that the authorities of the Netherlands have violated article 26 of the Covenant.
By refusing the child benefits for their foster children, the authors contend, a"family life with them is de facto impossible", thus violating their rights under article 17.
The authors contend that such representations were indeed made; the respondents contest it.
The District Court's judgement on witness credibility is no reason to doubt her statements, which the authors contend had never been doubted by the State party.
Some authors contend this wreck was a deliberate political act by Russia.
By submission of 17 March 2004, the authors contend that Argentina continues to act in bad faith towards them.
The authors contend that the length of the criminal proceedings was unreasonable, since they lasted five years and three months and there was nothing to justify that delay.
Of the seven systems that have already been quantified, the authors contend that mankind is already past the tipping points for climate change, the nitrogen cycle, and biodiversity loss.
The authors contend that article 22 of the Covenant is applicable to the Chambers, since they perform the functions of a private organization representing its economic interests.
With regard to article 1 of the Convention, the authors contend that in practice the criminal justice system predominantly and disproportionately negatively affects women.
The authors contend that the Hungarian authorities have violated their rights under article 12 of the Covenant.
As to the merits, the authors contend that the Court of Appeal's decision that the Marriage Act was not discriminatory was wrong.
The authors contend that this number had not been exceeded during the four years before 2011.
It also notes that the authors contend that, as conscientious objectors to military service, they had no free choice in the service that they had to perform.
The authors contend that this confirms the prioritizing of the majority's identity at the cost of pluralism.
By their submission of 31 July 2005, the authors contend that the victim and the authors have exhausted all domestic remedies, which would have been likely to bring sufficient relief.
The authors contend that their right to freedom of expression under article 19, paragraph 2, is infringed by the prescription of any particular language in private commercial activity.
On the issue of"effective participation", the authors contend that meetings such as the one of 19 February 1996 referred to by the State party(see paragraph 8.3 above) do not serve as a proper vehicle for effective participation.
The authors contend that the appeal court wrongly believed they did not want to adduce any evidence.
The authors contend that they are victims of violations by the State party of articles 4 and 6 of the Convention.
The authors contend that incommunicado detention entails a high risk of the violation of the right to life.
The authors contend that they are denied a fair and public hearing before an impartial and independent tribunal.
The authors contend that there are substantial grounds to believe that, if returned, they will be subjected to torture.
The authors contend that an application for a parent visa made from outside Australia would take"several years" to resolve.
The authors contend that the tax deduction constitutes a gross violation of the agreement between them and the Government of Zambia.
The authors contend that they have not been compensated for the time they were arbitrarily arrested, contrary to article 9, paragraph 5, of the Covenant.