Примеры использования Authors had на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The State party contends that the authors had sufficient time and facilities to prepare their defence.
It considered that this example alone could not be used to demonstrate that the authors had an effective remedy.
The Committee notes that the authors had full access to the courts of their country, and that the Supreme Court considered this matter on two occasions.
The Committee notes that the State party contests this allegation and points out that the authors had counsel of their own choosing.
Roman Catholic authors had the opportunity to defend their writings and could prepare a new edition with necessary corrections or deletions, either to avoid or to limit a ban.
It considered the State party's referenceto the Valdimar case, aimed at illustrating that the authors had an available and effective remedy.
The authors had the services of legal counsel from the moment of their arraignment, and their procedural rights were explained to them several times, in the presence of counsel.
In any case, there was no violation of article 14,paragraph 3(e), as the authors had the same opportunity as the defence to call the witnesses in question but chose not to do so.
Nevertheless, the authors had the opportunity to file a cassation appeal to the Supreme Court and also made use of extraordinary legal remedies by filing requests for review of the case based on new evidence and for the amendment of court errors.
Under section 243(e) and(f) of the Code of Civil Procedure,which came into force on 1 July 1998, the authors had the option of making extraordinary appeals to the"Prosecutor General", if they believed that a valid ruling of a court violated the law.
Previously, the authors had carried out the study, in which the patients after trospium hydrochloride course with minimal or unstable therapeutic effect were administered the combination of trospium and an increased dosage of one of three antimuscarinics- oxybutinin, solifenacin and tolterodine for 6 weeks.
As for the traditionalist opinions and articles mentioned by Ms. Tavares da Silva,contending that upholding women's rights undermined traditions, those authors had a right to their opinions, but the 18 to 19 million people of Mozambique likewise had a right to theirs.
It explained that the authors had been able to apply for and in fact had obtained a review of their conviction since their case had been considered by the Constitutional Court under the remedy of amparo.
The Committee likewise observes that, as the Constitutional Court noted,in this specific case the authors had the opportunity to participate actively in the various proceedings they initiated relating to the eviction, and that they even obtained interim measures of protection that suspended eviction for some time.
Its authors had the benefit of studying the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights- the major international human rights instruments then in existence.
With regard to the requirement laid down in article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol,the Committee takes note of the State party's argument that the authors had the possibility to appeal the decision of the Novopolotsk City Court to the Chairperson of the Supreme Court, as well as to file a motion to the Prosecutor General, requesting him to lodge an objection with the Chairperson of the Supreme Court.
The Committee concluded that the authors had therefore no effective remedy to contest their denial of a quota, and that it was not precluded from considering the communication under article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
The State party concludes from the above that the authors had ample opportunity to retain counsel of their choice and that the appointment of legal aid counsel in the specific circumstances did not constitute a breach of the Covenant.
The Committee noted counsel's argument that the authors had no access to legal advice but observed that the authors were represented at trial by a privately retained lawyer and that no special circumstances existed that prevented them from exhausting domestic remedies in that respect.
The authors have no conflict of interest related to the study.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Authors have no conflicts of interest.
The author had access to workplace information in the same manner as other officers.
Authors have rights.
It confirms that the author had access to legal advisers.
Authors have the right to republish the material only if agreed on by the editorial staff.
The authors have won several international awards.
Authors have an access to a comfortable WYSIWYG editor for their own"Entries" creation.