Примеры использования Clear grounds на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Adopt clear grounds for disciplinary liability of judges.
Article 4, driven by article 3 and with the additional contextual support of articles 11, 12,14, 20 and 26, provides clear grounds for decolonization.
Article 4, driven by article 3, provides clear grounds for an application to the Special Committee for decolonization.
The hypothesis that changes in productivity andrelative energy prices exert a statistically significant influence on changes in energy efficiency in the developed part of the world economy through time had to be rejected on clear grounds.
The resolution defines, inter alia, the terms"clear grounds","detention" and"inspection" of ships, and"valid certificates.
There are clear grounds for the General Assembly to support reinstatement on the list of Non-Self-Governing Territories.
The amendments clarify the original Act, remove redundant prohibitions and establish clear grounds and procedures for restricting the right to freedom of assembly.
When a State has clear grounds to believe that proper jurisdiction and control with respect to a ship have not been exercised, it may report the fact to the flag State.
Article 94(6) imposes upon the flag State an obligation to investigate reports from other States having clear grounds to believe that proper jurisdiction and control have not been exercised.
The paragraph enables any State which has clear grounds to believe that proper jurisdiction and control with respect to a ship have not been exercised, to report the facts to the flag State.
Although there may be merit in recruiting a good quality consultant on more than one occasion,supporting files fail to demonstrate clear grounds for repeated recruitment, or the consideration of viable alternatives.
Foreign ships may be inspected in ports in cases where there are clear grounds for believing that the master or crew are not familiar with the essential shipboard procedures relating to the prevention of pollution by garbage, and to inspect the garbage record book.
The decision of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in M/V Saiga(No.2), in paragraph 82, took that view that article 94, paragraph 6,of the 1982 Convention provides the relevant remedy for States that have clear grounds to believe that proper jurisdiction and control have not been exercised.
If there are clear grounds for believing that serious harm to the marine environment is likely to occur, the Secretary-General shall act in accordance with regulation 35 and, if necessary, shall take immediate measures of a temporary nature as provided for in regulation 35 3.
Even if a valid certificate is on board the ship,the duly authorized officers may still have clear grounds for believing that the ship is not in compliance based on their professional judgment.
If the coastal State has clear grounds for believing that a ship is not in compliance, it may either require the ship to rectify the non-compliance or proceed to a location specified in its territorial sea or internal waters; or it may inspect the ship if it is in its territorial sea, or deny its entry into port.
Prior to this development, port State control was limited to inspecting the condition of a ship orits equipment when there were"clear grounds" for believing that they did not correspond substantially with the particulars of the ship's certification of compliance.
In this connection, UNCLOS specifies that where a State has clear grounds to believe that proper jurisdiction and control with respect to a ship have not been exercised, its only recourse is to report the facts to the flag State, which is then obliged to“investigate the matter and, if appropriate, take any action necessary to remedy the situation”.52.
The new Procedures for the Control of Operational Requirements related to the Safety of Ships andPollution Prevention 63/ provide detailed guidance for assessing the circumstances under which a port State can determine whether there are"clear grounds" for believing that the ship's officers and crew are not familiar with essential shipboard procedures.
A ship can only be denied entry into port orbe expelled therefrom if there are clear grounds for believing that the ship poses an immediate threat to the security or safety of persons, or of ships or other property, and there are no appropriate means for removing the threat.
As of 17 August 2007(expected date of entry into force pursuant to the tacit amendment procedure) a ship, when in a port or at an offshore terminal of another State party, will be subject to inspection concerning operational requirements under the annex,where there are clear grounds for believing that the master or crew are not familiar with essential shipboard procedures relating to the prevention of pollution by sewage.
Obligation of the flag State to investigate the report of a State which has clear grounds to believe that proper jurisdiction and control with respect to a ship flying its flag have not been exercised and, if appropriate, to take any action necessary to remedy the situation.
A ship, when in a port or an offshore terminal under the jurisdiction of another party, is subject to inspection by officers duly authorized by such party concerning operational requirements under this Annex,where there are clear grounds for believing that the master or crew are not familiar with essential shipboard procedures relating to the prevention of air pollution from ships.
If such communication does not result in rectification, orif such officers have clear grounds otherwise for believing that the ship is in non-compliance with the requirements of this chapter or part A of the ISPS Code, such officers may take steps in relation to that ship as provided in paragraph 2.5.
In order to avoid the improper use of accountability mechanisms,it is crucial that the following elements are in place: clear grounds for a removal, suspension or sanction; an independent, internal body in charge of disciplinary proceedings; and the right to have disciplinary decisions reviewed by a higher judicial tribunal.
The ship security plan is not subject to inspection by the Port State Control officers,unless there are clear grounds to believe that the ship is not in compliance with the requirements of Chapter XI-2 of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea(SOLAS) or Part A of the ISPS Code, and the only means of verification is familiarization with the Plan.
This initiative aimed at clearing ground for urban development in the Taksim area.
In addition, a British NGO, Cleared Ground Demining, has been operational since 2007.
Cleared Ground Demining has been funded for 2011, and there is no further information about their support after 2011.
In September and October, the national mine action NGO,Lutamos Todos Contra as Minas, in partnership with the international NGO Cleared Ground Demining and the national NGO HUMAID,cleared 128,367 m2 of landmines and destroyed 1,829 pieces of unexploded ordnance, 8 anti-personnel mines and 14 anti-tank mines.