Примеры использования Commission's commentary на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
According to the Commission's commentary to this provision.
However, some clarification on this issue is found in the Commission's commentary to article 4.
The Commission's commentary does not throw much light on the issue.
Despite the present wording of the article, the Commission's commentary tries to extend this attribution rule to both situations.
The Commission's commentary to draft article 17(which became article 20) clearly explains the intent of these provisions.
The fact that existing subparagraphs(f) and(g) form sub-units of the new subparagraph(a)is confirmed in the Commission's commentary.
As noted in the Commission's commentary, this text is based on article 7 of the charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal.
A more cautious approach to that principle was needed. Since the wording of principle(f) was also unclear,his delegation would await the Commission's commentary on the subject.
The Commission's commentary to article 2, paragraph 1(d), of its 1966 draft articles describes this dialectic unequivocally.
With respect to so-called"early" acceptances, the Commission's commentary on draft article 17(current article 20) clearly indicates that.
The Commission's commentary moreover fails to support the distinction it advocates in its guidelines.
Second, as to countermeasures(article 22), the International Law Commission's commentary is clear that this doctrine does not apply to cases of armed conflict.
As the Commission's commentary indicated, the latter use was not the same thing as the notion of"significant harm.
His delegation welcomed the changes made in draft articles 9 to 13 and agreed with the Commission's commentary that draft article 15(d) was an exercise in progressive development.
According to the Commission's commentary, draft article 11 is based on the equivalent provision in the Vienna Convention, namely article 45.
Concerning article 17 of the articles on State responsibility,it is noted that the examples mentioned in the Commission's commentary to that article for direction of or control over a State by another State do not fit for international organizations.
The Commission's commentary points out that this provision is analogous to draft article 15, another very troubling proposal that IMF has commented on above.
It is therefore enough to refer to the Commission's commentary to that provision, and guideline 2.4.4 follows specifically therefrom.
The Commission's commentary to guideline 1.1.3(Reservations having territorial scope) contained convincing arguments in support of reservations of that kind.
With respect to so-called"early" acceptances, the Commission's commentary on draft article 17(current article 20 of the Vienna Convention) clearly indicates that.
Contrary to the Commission's commentary to guideline 1.1.1, his delegation did not share the criticism concerning the use of the word“provisions” in the Vienna definition.
The only case discussed by the International Law Commission's commentary outside this area was the Rainbow Warrior arbitration involving health concerns of two detained agents of France.
The Commission's commentary, the reports of the Ad Hoc Committee and the General Assembly resolution adopting the Convention would form an important part of the travaux préparatoires of the Convention.
First, both Mr Bowett's comments and the Commission's commentary to Draft Article 50 confirm that the Commission was of the view that there remained room for the further development of jus cogens.
However, the Commission's commentary does not offer any examples of serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law committed by international organizations.
Consequently, the Commission's commentary to the effect that the guideline did not make it difficult to formulate reservations was not very realistic.
In that respect, the Commission's commentary was very balanced, in that it reflected the vital importance of drinking water in certain places without prejudging the situation in other instances.
The Commission's commentary might throw light on the meaning of particular articles of the Vienna Conventions, but States seldom referred to the commentary before citing an article of the Convention.
The Commission's commentary, the Ad Hoc Committee's reports and its Chairman's statement, and the General Assembly resolution adopting the Convention would form part of the travaux préparatoires of the Convention.
As is clear from the Commission's commentary, the more elaborate definition employed in the draft articles on responsibility of international organizations was devised for the particular circumstances of that topic.