Примеры использования Committee does not consider на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
As such, the Committee does not consider that they require the same level of access to the Fund.
The State party maintains that the present communicationshould also be declared inadmissible pursuant article 22, paragraph 5(a) of the Convention, as the Committee does not consider any communication which has been or is being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.
The Committee does not consider that the author has established a violation of article 14, paragraph 1.
In light of the above findings, the Committee does not consider it necessary to address the author's claims under article 10 of the Covenant.
The Committee does not consider proposals related to functions being carried out by a private company to be analogous.
Люди также переводят
In accordance with article 22, paragraph 5(b),of the Convention, the Committee does not consider any communication unless it has ascertained that the complainant has exhausted all available domestic remedies.
The Committee does not consider the implementation of this recommendation to be practical without the introduction of a cost-accounting system, which at this stage does not exist.
In accordance with article 22, paragraph 5(b), of the Convention, the Committee does not consider any communication unless it has ascertained that the complainant has exhausted all available domestic remedies.
The Committee does not consider the specific demolitions that were of concern for the communicant, but rather the application of the Convention in the hybrid bills system of the Party concerned.
In accordance with article 22,paragraph 5(b), of the Convention, the Committee does not consider any communication unless it has ascertained that the complainant has exhausted all available domestic remedies.
The Committee does not consider the requests for pardon and supervisory review applications as domestic remedies that must be exhausted before a communication is submitted.
Under these circumstances, the Committee does not consider the given time-frame as amounting to non-compliance with the Convention.
The Committee does not consider that a general statement about the adequacy of the criminal proceedings in question meets this obligation.
In the instant case, the Committee does not consider the three-year delay as an abuse of the right of submission.
The Committee does not consider the allegation that in the context of article 9, paragraph 2, NGOs can request review only with respect to legal provisions that establish personal rights for individuals, since the communicant and the Party concerned have agreed that this issue has been resolved by the CJEU decision in Trianel, subsequently reflected in the case law of the German courts and by the 2013 amendment of the EAA.
But in any event, the Committee does not consider that the removal of their New Zealand citizenship was arbitrary.
The Committee does not consider that the delays encountered are attributable to the second author or his late father.
In accordance with article 22, paragraph 5(b), of the Convention, the Committee does not consider any communication unless it has ascertained that the individual has exhausted all available domestic remedies; this rule does not apply where it has been established that the application of the remedies has been unreasonably prolonged, or that it is unlikely, after a fair trial, to bring effective relief to the alleged victim.
The Committee does not consider the fact that two of the authors are organizations to be an obstacle to admissibility.
In accordance with article 22, paragraph 5(b), of the Convention, the Committee does not consider any complaint unless it has ascertained that the complainant has exhausted all available domestic remedies; this rule does not apply where it has been established that the application of those remedies has been unreasonably prolonged, or that it is unlikely to bring effective relief to the alleged victim.
The Committee does not consider that this would have constituted an effective remedy for the author in relation to his claims under article 7.
In accordance with article 22, paragraph 5(b), of the Convention, the Committee does not consider any communication unless it has ascertained that the complainant has exhausted all available domestic remedies; this rule does not apply where it has been established that the application of the remedies has been unreasonably prolonged, or that it is unlikely, after a fair trial, to bring effective relief to the alleged victim.
The Committee does not consider this recommendation implemented and trusts that the Board of Auditors will continue its follow-up.
In accordance with article 22, paragraph 5(b), of the Convention, the Committee does not consider any communication unless it has ascertained that the individual has exhausted all available domestic remedies; this rule does not apply where it has been established that the application of the remedies has been unreasonably prolonged, or that it is unlikely, after a fair trial, to bring effective relief to the alleged victim.
The Committee does not consider the information provided in section V of the proposed budget to be an adequate response to its concerns.
The Committee does not consider that a general statement about the criminal proceedings in question meets this obligation.
The Committee does not consider this to be a convincing argument and accordingly does not recommend approval of the proposed reclassifications.
Accordingly, the Committee does not consider itself precluded by the State party's reservation to the Optional Protocol from considering the communication.
The Committee does not consider that this alleged violation continued to have effects after May 1987, which would in themselves have constituted violations of the author's Covenant rights.
The Committee does not consider that these alleged violations continued to have effects after 10 March 1988, which would in themselves have constituted violations of the authors' Covenant rights.