Примеры использования Complainant's case на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Such exceptional circumstances have not been presented in the complainant's case.
Nevertheless, the complainant's case was closed pursuant to article 257 of the CPC.
It recalls that the Oslo City Court considered the complainant's case on 7 December 2004.
The complainant's case proves it, the State party argues, as his curriculum vitae shows.
She also said that Amnesty International had agreed to monitor the complainant's case.
In the State party's view the complainant's case was assessed thoroughly, by both UDI and UNE.
Legislation other than that invoked by the State party is relevant for the complainant's case;
Ms. Freivalds informed the Deputy Minister of the complainant's case and the allegations made regarding his illtreatment.
The State party contended that EPRP's Norwegian section had only limited knowledge of the complainant's case.
The Committee notes that the courts that tried the complainant's case concluded that he had indeed been tortured.
He took into account the general human rights situation in India as well as the particular circumstances of the complainant's case.
In the complainant's case, the Migration Board took its decision after conducting two comprehensive interviews with the complainant. .
ICANN is not qualified noris it appropriate to have ICANN re-argue the Complainant's case in the PDDRP proceeding.
The State party points out that the complainant's case remains under examination, and domestic remedies have therefore not been exhausted.
Counsel argues that a similarly rigorous approach, with effective protection provided by the legal system,ought to have been followed in the complainant's case.
The Migration Board of Appeals ceased to exist in March 2006, and the complainant's case was referred to the Stockholm Migration Court.
The complainant's case was assessed primarily under the 1989 Aliens Act, including the temporary legislation, but the 2005 Aliens Act was also applied.
Therefore, the complainants submit that the neither the Federal Magistrates Court, nor any higher court, have any jurisdiction to review the merits of the complainant's case.
It states that its decision to review the complainant's case was taken by the Board on its own initiative, without any formal request by the complainant. .
Therefore, the State party was aware of the"severe pain and suffering" generally experienced by those held in solitary confinement,and particularly in the complainant's case.
The Migration Board thereupon forwarded the complainant's case, on 12 November 2001, to the Government for a strength of the decision under chapter 7, section 11(2)(2), of the Aliens Act.
On 19 April 2006, the complainant responded that on 15 November 2005 the Swedish Migration Board, ex officio, registered the complainant's case for examination under the temporary legislation.
The Committee had planned to consider the complainant's case in the absence of observations from the State party at its fifty-first session, which took place from 28 October to 22 November 2013.
As to the merits of such allegation, the State party has no reason to believe that solitary confinement is used generally, orwould be used in the complainant's case specifically.
Counsel expands on the earlier reference to involvement of the United States of America in the complainant's case in paragraph 10.2, referring to a book entitled Chain of Command by Seymour Hersh.
In this context, it states that the complainant's case was assessed by the Migration Board in 1990 and 1994, by the Aliens Appeal Board in 1992 and by both the Migration Board and the Government in 2002.
The complainant's representatives welcome the general measures to combat torture outlined by the State party, butnote that the State party has not explained how any of these new measures relate to the complainant's case.
The State party also submits that the complainant's case was reviewed under the PRRA programme, which is founded in Canada's domestic and international commitments to the principle of non-refoulement.
The State party also initially challenged the admissibility of the complaint fornon-exhaustion of domestic remedies, as it argued that under a new provision of Swedish law the Migration Board could review the complainant's case once more.
The Committee notes that the Swedish immigration authorities have thoroughly evaluated the complainant's case and considered whether the complainant risked torture or persecution in Bangladesh; they concluded that he was not at risk.