Примеры использования Complainant's claims на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Any defense which contradicts the Complainant's claims.
The Tribunal concluded that the complainant's claims about his Falun Gong activities and practice were not credible.
The State party maintained that the late submission of such a crucial fact further undermined the credibility of the complainant's claims.
The preliminary examination of the complainant's claims of torture was later examined by a prosecutor.
Since the State party has offered no substantive observations on the merits,due weight must be given to the complainant's claims.
The State party reiterates that the complainant's claims are manifestly unfounded and therefore inadmissible.
With regard to the existence of an arrest warrant, the State party emphasizes that there is no such warrant despite the complainant's claims.
The State party submits that the complainant's claims have been considered fairly in the domestic proceedings.
The Court acquitted the complainant on the basis, inter alia, of the statements made by a number of witnesses who corroborated the complainant's claims.b.
Finally, the State party submits that the complainant's claims are full of factual inconsistencies, which undermines her credibility.
In its reply, OSAR had confirmed that members of religious groups such as GJCC were not subject to persecution andhad raised certain doubts as to the veracity of the complainant's claims.
However, the Office considered that the complainant's claims that he would be prosecuted by the Togolese authorities were not credible.
In its second decision of 28 April 2009, the Federal Office for Migration concluded that the complainant's claims that he was being sought by the authorities were unconvincing.
It therefore considers that the complainant's claims under articles 12, 13 and 14 of the Convention are admissible and proceeds to its examination on the merits.
In any case, the very fact that the Prosecutor's Office refused to initiate criminal proceedings concerning the complainant's claims of torture does not demonstrate that his complaint was not examined objectively.
The Tribunal decided that the complainant's claims about being a Falun Gong practitioner and having a well-founded fear of persecution in China were not credible.
According to the State party, independent, impartial Canadian experts have analysed the complainant's claims in accordance with the applicable laws and the principle of equity.
Furthermore, the complainant's claims were considered by the Immigration Department on three different occasions in the context of her applications for ministerial intervention.
In assessing the risk of torture in the present case,the Committee notes the complainant's claims that she had been imprisoned and severely ill-treated by the Ethiopian military in May 2006.
With regard to the complainant's claims that the Federal Administrative Tribunal has made rulings granting asylum to other people occupying similar positions, the State party asserts that each case is examined on its merits.
In addition to that, the State party submits, in accordance with article 22, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the complainant's claims that he is at risk of being treated in a manner that would amount to a breach of the Convention is not sufficiently substantiated.
However, the complainant's claims did not appear plausible to ARK, since, according to it, the complainant had neither substantiated nor proven psychological obstacles to at least mentioning the rape in the initial interview.
Finally, the State party considers the complaint manifestly unfounded, as the complainant's claims fail to rise to the basic level of substantiation required in light of the arguments on the merits set out below.
As to the complainant's claims under article 16 of the Convention, the Committee notes that no arguments or evidence have been submitted in substantiation of this claim, and therefore the Committee concludes that this claim has not been substantiated for the purposes of admissibility.
With regard to the State party's argument that there are many inconsistencies in the complainant's claims, the Committee notes that this argument has not been substantiated since the State party has not specified what these inconsistencies were.
The Committee has noted the complainant's claims under article 16 of the Convention concerning the allegedly inadequate health care provided to him, and of the poor conditions of detention while he was in the prison colony.
The State party is therefore of the view that the complainant's claims have been considered by the national courts in accordance with the law and have been rejected.
The Committee notes the complainant's claims that his children were themselves persecuted in Kinshasa because of their origins, which led them to leave the country with the help of a"white female" in July 2005; and that they applied for asylum on 22 August 2005.
The Court stated that when it rejects the complainant's claims, it no longer has to continue and protect the complainant and her interests privacy, dignity and reputation.
The Committee notes that the complainant's claims about his activities in CERDEC are very vague, and that the statement of his alleged brother and president of CERDEC Russia-CIS does not establish a family relationship.