Примеры использования Complainant applied на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The complainant applied for asylum on 15 September 2008.
This fear also explains why the complainant applied for asylum with a false name.
After the complainant applied for asylum in 2009, the Migration Board informed him of the importance of substantiating his identity.
On the facts, the State party indicates that the complainant applied for asylum on 13 August 2003.
Thus, the complainant applied for asylum on 3 September 2003.
His wife posted bail of Can$ 5,000 for his release.On 18 December 2006, the complainant applied for leave and for judicial review of the PRRA decision.
On 17 March 1989, the complainant applied for a renewal of his refugee travelling document, which was granted.
The couple separated in April 1998, moved back together in March 1999, but finally divorced in December 2000.On 24 April 1997, the complainant applied for asylum.
On 29 May 1997, the complainant applied for asylum in the Netherlands.
The reason that the Board gave for its decision was that PA-Amasekanya, of which the complainant is a member, is an organization with limited and violent objectives, which has reportedly"committed human orinternational rights violations". On 23 September 2005, the complainant applied for leave and for judicial review of the Board's decision dated 7 September 2005.
In parallel with this the complainant applied for a pre-removal risk assessment PRRA.
The complainant applied to the Federal Court for leave to apply for judicial review of the Board's Decision, which was granted on 16 March 2006.
The State party underlines that the complainant applied for asylum a week after his arrival in Switzerland.
The complainant applied to the European Court of Human Rights application No. 34132/03 of 29 October 2003, declared inadmissible on 29 April 2005.
The State party submits that the different French administrative andjudicial authorities to which the complainant applied conducted a thorough and balanced review of his situation under conditions free from any form of arbitrariness, in accordance with the requirements of the Committee.
The complainant applied to the Federal Court for leave to apply for judicial review of the H&C decision, which was dismissed without reasons on 6 September 2007.
She notes: in most cases, the courts came to the conclusion that limitation of actions is applicable to this claim,since, in fact, the complainant applied to the court for protection of his corporate right which has economic content and is not non-property within the meaning of Article 269 of the Civil Code(CC) of Ukraine.
The complainant applied for leave and judicial review of the PRRA decision before the Federal Court of Canada on 14 October 2004, which was due to be heard on 25 October 2004.
He departed Australia on 9 October 2002 andthen re-entered Australia on 1 October 2003 on a subclass 676(Tourist) visa. On 10 October 2003, the complainant applied to the immigration department for a Protection Visa under the Migration Act 1958, claiming the status of refugee under the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951.
On 14 July 1994 the complainant applied for asylum in the Netherlands. His application was rejected by the State Secretary of the Department of Justice on 30 August 1994.
On 26 August 1997, the complainant applied for political asylum in Switzerland.
Furthermore, the complainant applied for asylum only eight months after his arrival in Denmark because, not knowing about the asylum procedure when he arrived, he met a woman and thought it better to get married.
Shortly after he arrived in Switzerland, the complainant applied for asylum and has become an active member of the Iranian opposition movement in Switzerland.
On 26 December 2003, the complainant applied for asylum in Switzerland. On 25 August 2004, the Federal Office for Migration rejected his asylum application. On 24 November 2008, the Federal Administrative Tribunal rejected his appeal and set 5 January 2009 as the deadline for his departure from Switzerland.
On 23 September 2005, the complainant applied for leave and for judicial review of the Board's decision.
On 29 June 2005, the complainant applied to the Ministry of Refugee, Immigration and Integration Affairs for a residence permit on humanitarian grounds.
On an unspecified date, the complainant applied to the Federal Court for a stay of execution of his removal order.
On 23 February 2001, the complainant applied for asylum at the Swiss Embassy in Colombo. On 27 February 2001, he was invited for an interview on 16 March 2001, which he did not attend.
After a deportation order had been issued, the complainant applied for refugee status, but his application was dismissed because of his inadmissibility on grounds of serious criminality.
On 17 January 2001, the complainant applied to the Federal Agency to reopen proceedings in his case, arguing that he had been trained by the PKK in a camp in the Netherlands in 1994, with a view to joining the PKK's armed forces in south-east Turkey, a duty from which he had been exempted at his subsequent request.